• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

草原与洪泛治理——对比饲草可提高地表水入渗率。

Grasslands and flood mitigation - Contrasting forages improve surface water infiltration rates.

机构信息

Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS), Aberystwyth University, Gogerddan, Ceredigion, Wales SY23 3EE, UK.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2024 Nov 15;951:175598. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175598. Epub 2024 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175598
PMID:39159691
Abstract

Grasslands globally deliver many ecosystem services, including water management to alleviate flood risk reduction. Two replicated field experiments were conducted to study how agricultural forage species with diverse rooting systems, sown as single species, affected rooting, soil structure and earthworm populations, and consequently water infiltration to understand how they each might influence flood risk from grasslands. Experiment One showed soils under red clover (Trifolium pratense), white clover (Trifolium repens) and chicory (Cichorium intybus) had higher infiltration rates three years after establishment, compared to perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). Higher red clover and chicory root biomass or increased earthworm abundance under white clover may have caused these effects. Experiment Two monitored infiltration at intervals over several years post establishment to understand the timeframe for changes in rates; plantain (Plantago lanceolata) was sown as an additional forage. Infiltration declined post establishment, the timing and extent of decline varying with forages; forage effects were significant after 27 months (P < 0.05). Infiltration rates were higher under red and white clover compared to ryegrass, with chicory and plantain intermediate (P < 0.05). Forages again differed in likely mechanisms delivering higher water infiltration, notably between the two clover species. White clover had higher earthworm biomass (P < 0.05), whereas red clover had a higher average root diameter compared to the other forages (P < 0.05). Drivers of intermediate benefits of chicory and plantain also differed: chicory had higher earthworm abundance (month 38) compared to plantain, which had higher average root diameter compared to ryegrass (month 41); 30 months post-establishment soil bulk density was lower under both forages compared to ryegrass and red clover, with white clover intermediate (P < 0.05); bulk density and penetration resistance did not relate to infiltration. Findings demonstrate that a shift from perennial ryegrass-dominated pastures to swards with more contrasting forages provides an ecohydrological approach to mitigating flood risk and climate adaptation.

摘要

全球草原提供了许多生态系统服务,包括管理水资源以减轻洪水风险。进行了两项复制的田间实验,以研究具有不同根系系统的农业饲料物种如何作为单一物种播种,从而影响根系、土壤结构和蚯蚓种群,并因此了解它们如何影响草原的洪水风险。实验一表明,与多年生黑麦草(Lolium perenne)相比,在建立后的三年中,红三叶草(Trifolium pratense)、白三叶草(Trifolium repens)和菊苣(Cichorium intybus)下的土壤具有更高的入渗率。较高的红三叶草和菊苣根系生物量或白三叶草下蚯蚓丰度的增加可能导致了这些影响。实验二监测了建立后多年的几次入渗间隔,以了解速率变化的时间范围;车前草(Plantago lanceolata)被播种为额外的饲料。建立后,入渗率下降,下降的时间和程度因饲料而异;27 个月后(P<0.05),饲料的影响显著。与黑麦草相比,红三叶草和白三叶草下的入渗率较高,而菊苣和车前草居中(P<0.05)。饲料在提供更高的水分入渗方面再次表现出不同的机制,特别是在两种三叶草之间。白三叶草的蚯蚓生物量较高(P<0.05),而红三叶草的平均根直径与其他饲料相比更高(P<0.05)。菊苣和车前草中间效益的驱动因素也不同:与车前草相比,菊苣的蚯蚓丰度较高(第 38 个月),而与黑麦草相比,车前草的平均根直径较高(第 41 个月);建立后 30 个月,两种饲料下的土壤容重均低于黑麦草和红三叶草,而白三叶草居中(P<0.05);容重和穿透阻力与入渗无关。研究结果表明,从以多年生黑麦草为主的牧场向具有更多对比饲料的草丛转变,为减轻洪水风险和适应气候变化提供了一种生态水文学方法。

相似文献

1
Grasslands and flood mitigation - Contrasting forages improve surface water infiltration rates.草原与洪泛治理——对比饲草可提高地表水入渗率。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Nov 15;951:175598. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175598. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
2
Selection by Lambs Grazing Plantain ( L.), Chicory ( L.), White Clover ( L.), Red Clover ( L.) and Perennial Ryegrass ( L.) across Seasons.羔羊在不同季节对车前草(Plantago lanceolata L.)、菊苣(Cichorium intybus L.)、白三叶草(Trifolium repens L.)、红三叶草(Trifolium pratense L.)和多年生黑麦草(Lolium perenne L.)的采食选择
Animals (Basel). 2020 Dec 3;10(12):2292. doi: 10.3390/ani10122292.
3
Sward type alters enteric methane emissions, nitrogen output and the relative abundance of the rumen microbial ecosystem in sheep.饲草类型改变绵羊的肠道甲烷排放、氮排泄和瘤胃微生物生态系统的相对丰度。
J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae256.
4
The inclusion of companion forages in the diet alongside perennial ryegrass increased dry matter intake and organic matter digestibility in sheep.在绵羊的饮食中加入伴草与黑麦草一起,可增加干物质摄入量和有机物消化率。
Animal. 2024 May;18(5):101150. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101150. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
5
Novel forages for growth and health in farmed deer.用于养殖鹿生长和健康的新型饲料。
N Z Vet J. 2002 Dec;50(6):244-51. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2002.36320.
6
The effect of dietary forage on the development and survival of helminth parasites in ovine faeces.日粮草料对绵羊粪便中蠕虫寄生虫发育和存活的影响。
Vet Parasitol. 2003 Dec 1;118(1-2):93-107. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2003.10.004.
7
More milk from forage: Milk production, blood metabolites, and forage intake of dairy cows grazing pasture mixtures and spatially adjacent monocultures.来自牧草的更多牛奶:放牧混合牧草和空间相邻单一作物的奶牛的产奶量、血液代谢产物及牧草摄入量
J Dairy Sci. 2016 May;99(5):3512-3528. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10542. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
8
Pasture intake and milk production of dairy cows rotationally grazing on multi-species swards.奶牛在多物种草地轮牧中的采食量和产奶量。
Animal. 2016 Sep;10(9):1448-56. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116000331. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
9
Effect of increasing the proportion of chicory in forage-based diets on intake and digestion by sheep.增加饲料中菊苣比例对绵羊采食量和消化的影响。
Animal. 2019 Apr;13(4):718-726. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118002185. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
10
Source partitioning using NO isotopomers and soil WFPS to establish dominant NO production pathways from different pasture sward compositions.利用 NO 同位素分馏和土壤水分含量建立不同牧草地植被组成中主导的 NO 产生途径。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Aug 10;781:146515. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146515. Epub 2021 Mar 17.