Martínez Ezequiel F, García-Mansilla Agustín M, Lucero Carlos M, Buttaro Martin A, Slullitel Pablo A
'Sir John Charnley' Hip Surgery Unit, Institute of Orthopaedics 'Carlos E. Ottolenghi', Italian Hospital of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Feb;40(2):443-448. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.016. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
We aimed to determine the association between lower extremity arterial calcification (LEAC) and referral to a closed unit (CU), length of stay, 90-day readmissions, and 1-year mortality in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients.
We retrospectively analyzed 705 patients who underwent primary THA, identifying 64 patients (9.13%) who had LEAC and 641 who did not have LEAC. Patients who had LEAC were older (77 ± 10.0 versus 67 ± 11.5 years; P < 0.001) and had more comorbidities, except for a history of thromboembolic and oncologic diseases (P > 0.05). A preoperative antero-posterior pelvic radiograph was used to assess the presence of LEAC. Admission to CU, length of stay, 90-day readmissions, and 1-year mortality were recorded. A logistic regression model was used to identify risk factors for referral to CU.
Patients who had LEAC had a higher incidence of admission to the intensive care unit (8 of 64 [12.5%] versus 8 of 641 [1.09%]; P < 0.001), a longer hospital stay (4.7 ± 1.8 versus 4.2 ± 1.3 days; P = 0.006), more readmissions (16 of 64 [25%] versus 33 of 641 [5.15%]; P < 0.001), and a higher 1-year mortality rate (6 of 64 [9.3%] versus 0 of 641 [0%]; P < 0.001) than patients who did not have LEAC. Of the patients who had LEAC admitted to CU, only 3 of 8 had a previous indication to do so in the preoperative assessment performed by the Department of Anesthesiology, while all non-LEAC ones referred to CU did so. Logistic regression analysis showed that LEAC was a risk factor for admission to CU (odds ratio = 4.77; 95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 20.25; P = 0.034).
The presence of LEAC was a risk factor for transfer to CU, longer in-hospital stays, more readmissions, and a higher 1-year mortality rate. Identifying patients who have LEAC can aid in the preoperative assessment and risk stratification of patients planned for primary THA.
我们旨在确定原发性全髋关节置换术(THA)患者的下肢动脉钙化(LEAC)与转入封闭病房(CU)、住院时间、90天再入院率和1年死亡率之间的关联。
我们回顾性分析了705例行原发性THA的患者,确定64例(9.13%)有LEAC的患者和641例无LEAC的患者。有LEAC的患者年龄更大(77±10.0岁对67±11.5岁;P<0.001),且合并症更多,但血栓栓塞和肿瘤疾病史除外(P>0.05)。术前前后位骨盆X线片用于评估LEAC的存在情况。记录转入CU的情况、住院时间、90天再入院率和1年死亡率。采用逻辑回归模型确定转入CU的危险因素。
有LEAC的患者入住重症监护病房(ICU)的发生率更高(64例中的8例[12.5%]对641例中的8例[1.09%];P<0.001),住院时间更长(4.7±1.8天对4.2±1.3天;P=0.006),再入院次数更多(64例中的16例[25%]对641例中的33例[5.15%];P<0.001),1年死亡率更高(64例中的6例[9.3%]对641例中的0例[0%];P<0.001)。在入住CU的有LEAC的患者中,麻醉科术前评估中只有8例中的3例有先前转入CU的指征,而所有转入CU的无LEAC的患者均有该指征。逻辑回归分析显示,LEAC是转入CU的危险因素(比值比=4.77;95%置信区间:1.12至20.25;P=0.034)。
LEAC的存在是转入CU、住院时间延长、再入院次数增加和1年死亡率升高的危险因素。识别有LEAC的患者有助于对计划行原发性THA的患者进行术前评估和风险分层。