Calpbinici Pelin, Uzunkaya Öztoprak Pınar, Terzioğlu Füsun
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University, Semra and Vefa Küçük Faculty of Health Sciences, Nevşehir, Turkiye
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkiye.
J Nurs Meas. 2024 Aug 19. doi: 10.1891/JNM-2024-0028.
In the current literature, no existing scale that can measure nurse specific coaching-based leadership has been found. The study was conducted to determine the Turkish validity and reliability of the Coaching-Based Leadership Scale (CBLS). The research is methodological. The study was conducted in two sample groups for the employees' and leaders' versions of the scale. The confirmatory factor analysis of the scale revealed that both the employees' and leaders' versions have a 16-item, four-factor structure, and the fit indices were confirmed as follows: for the employees' version: Chi-square (χ) = 361.948, χ/degrees of freedom () = 4.022, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.133, goodness of fit index (GFI) = 0.808, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.941, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.821, and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = 0.0317, and for the leaders' version: χ = 180.121, χ/ = 1.896, RMSEA = 0.104, GFI = 0.809, CFI = 0.970, TLI = 0.962, and SRMR = 0.0177. The obtained fit indices indicated a good fit. The scale-item-total score correlations were found to range from = 0.816 to = 0.952 for the employees' version and from = 0.922 to = 0.968 for the leaders' version, which were determined to be at an acceptable level. It was determined that the Cronbach's alpha (α) reliability coefficient of the scale was 0.98 in the employees' version and the Cronbach's α coefficients of its subdimensions were 0.93 for working alliance, 0.96 for open communication, 0.97 for learning and development, and 0.96 for progress and results. In the leaders' version, the Cronbach's α reliability coefficient was 0.99, while the Cronbach's α coefficients of its subdimensions were found to be 0.93 for working alliance, 0.96 for open communication, 0.97 for learning and development, and 0.96 for progress and results. It has been determined that the CBLS is a valid and reliable measurement tool for Turkish nursing employees and managers.
在当前文献中，尚未发现能够衡量护士特定的基于指导的领导力的现有量表。本研究旨在确定基于指导的领导力量表（CBLS）在土耳其语环境下的效度和信度。该研究属于方法学研究。针对该量表的员工版和领导版，研究在两个样本组中进行。该量表的验证性因素分析表明，员工版和领导版均具有16个项目、四因素结构，拟合指数如下得到确认：员工版：卡方（χ）= 361.948，χ/自由度（）= 4.022，近似均方根误差（RMSEA）= 0.133，拟合优度指数（GFI）= 0.808，比较拟合指数（CFI）= 0.941，塔克 - 刘易斯指数（TLI）= 0.821，标准化均方根残差（SRMR）= 0.0317；领导版：χ = 180.121，χ/ = 1.896，RMSEA = 0.104，GFI = 0.809，CFI = 0.970，TLI = 0.962，SRMR = 0.0177。所获得的拟合指数表明拟合良好。量表项目与总分的相关性在员工版中为 = 0.816至 = 0.952，在领导版中为 = 0.922至 = 0.968，确定处于可接受水平。已确定该量表在员工版中的克朗巴哈α（α）信度系数为0.98，其各子维度的克朗巴哈α系数分别为：工作联盟0.93、开放沟通0.96、学习与发展0.97、进步与成果0.96。在领导版中，克朗巴哈α信度系数为0.99，其各子维度的克朗巴哈α系数分别为：工作联盟0.93、开放沟通0.96、学习与发展0.97、进步与成果0.96。已确定CBLS是用于土耳其护理员工和管理人员的有效且可靠的测量工具。
