Suppr超能文献

在系统性红斑狼疮患者中皮下注射贝利尤单抗序贯治疗联合一个疗程利妥昔单抗的疗效和安全性:3 期、随机、安慰剂对照 BLISS-BELIEVE 研究。

Efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with subcutaneous belimumab and one cycle of rituximab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: the phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled BLISS-BELIEVE study.

机构信息

Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA

Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Oct 21;83(11):1502-1512. doi: 10.1136/ard-2024-225686.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Disease activity control in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with corticosteroid and immunosuppressant withdrawal is a treatment goal. We evaluated whether this could be attained with sequential subcutaneous belimumab (BEL) and one cycle of rituximab (RTX).

METHODS

In this phase 3, double-blind BLISS-BELIEVE trial (GSK Study 205646), patients with active SLE initiating subcutaneous BEL 200 mg/week for 52 weeks were randomised to intravenous placebo (BEL/PBO) or intravenous RTX 1000 mg (BEL/RTX) at weeks 4 and 6 while stopping concomitant immunosuppressants/tapering corticosteroids; standard therapy for 104 weeks (BEL/ST; reference arm) was included.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

proportion of patients achieving disease control (SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) ≤2; without immunosuppressants; prednisone equivalent ≤5 mg/day) at week 52 with BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO. Major (alpha-controlled) secondary endpoints: proportion of patients with clinical remission (week 64; clinical SLEDAI-2K=0, without immunosuppressants/corticosteroids); proportion of patients with disease control (week 104). Other assessments: disease control duration, anti-dsDNA antibody, C3/C4 and B cells/B-cell subsets.

RESULTS

The modified intention-to-treat population included 263 patients. Overall, 16.7% (12/72) of BEL/PBO and 19.4% (28/144) of BEL/RTX patients achieved disease control (OR (95% CI) 1.27 (0.60 to 2.71); p=0.5342) at week 52. For major secondary endpoints, differences between BEL/RTX and BEL/PBO were not statistically significant. Anti-dsDNA antibodies and most assessed B cells/B-cell subsets were lower with BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO. Mean disease control duration through 52 weeks was significantly greater with BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO.

CONCLUSIONS

BEL/RTX showed no superiority over BEL/PBO for most endpoints analysed; however, it led to significant improvements in disease activity markers compared with BEL/PBO. Further investigation of combination treatment is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03312907.

摘要

目的

系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者停用皮质类固醇和免疫抑制剂以实现疾病活动度控制是治疗目标。我们评估了能否通过序贯皮下贝利尤单抗(BEL)和一个周期的利妥昔单抗(RTX)来实现这一目标。

方法

在这项 3 期、双盲 BLISS-BELIEVE 试验(GSK 研究 205646)中,正在接受治疗的 SLE 患者接受皮下 BEL 200mg/周,共 52 周,随后在第 4 周和第 6 周随机分配接受静脉注射安慰剂(BEL/PBO)或静脉注射 RTX 1000mg(BEL/RTX),同时停用伴随的免疫抑制剂/逐渐减少皮质类固醇;包括 104 周的标准治疗(BEL/ST;参照臂)。

主要终点

BEL/RTX 与 BEL/PBO 相比,在第 52 周时达到疾病控制(SLE 疾病活动指数-2000(SLEDAI-2K)≤2;无免疫抑制剂;泼尼松等效剂量≤5mg/天)的患者比例。主要(alpha 控制)次要终点:第 64 周时达到临床缓解(临床 SLEDAI-2K=0,无免疫抑制剂/皮质类固醇)的患者比例;第 104 周时达到疾病控制的患者比例。其他评估:疾病控制持续时间、抗双链 DNA 抗体、C3/C4 和 B 细胞/B 细胞亚群。

结果

修改后的意向治疗人群包括 263 名患者。总体而言,16.7%(12/72)的 BEL/PBO 和 19.4%(28/144)的 BEL/RTX 患者在第 52 周达到疾病控制(OR(95%CI)1.27(0.60 至 2.71);p=0.5342)。对于主要次要终点,BEL/RTX 与 BEL/PBO 之间的差异无统计学意义。与 BEL/PBO 相比,BEL/RTX 组的抗双链 DNA 抗体和大多数评估的 B 细胞/B 细胞亚群水平更低。与 BEL/PBO 相比,BEL/RTX 组的疾病控制持续时间在 52 周内显著延长。

结论

与 BEL/PBO 相比,BEL/RTX 在大多数分析的终点上均无优势;然而,与 BEL/PBO 相比,它显著改善了疾病活动标志物。需要进一步研究联合治疗。

试验注册号

NCT03312907。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e60/11503042/33f32a79e9a0/ard-83-11-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验