Suppr超能文献

对四种认知行为压力管理能力进行等级排序和分析表明,积极主动的压力管理尤为有价值。

A rank ordering and analysis of four cognitive-behavioral stress-management competencies suggests that proactive stress management is especially valuable.

机构信息

American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology, Vista, CA, 92084, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 20;14(1):19224. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68328-4.

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to determine the relative value of four cognitive-behavioral competencies that have been shown in empirical studies to be associated with effective stress management. Based on a review of relevant psychological literature, we named the competencies as follows: Manages or Reduces Sources of Stress, Manages Thoughts, Plans and Prevents, and Practices Relaxation Techniques. We measured their relative value by examining data obtained from a diverse convenience sample of 18,895 English-speaking participants in 125 countries (65.0% from the U.S. and Canada) who completed a new inventory of stress-management competencies. We assessed their relative value by employing a concurrent study design, which also allowed us to assess the validity of the new instrument. Regression analyses were used to rank order the four competencies according to how well they predicted desirable outcomes. Both regression and factor analyses pointed to the importance of proactive stress-management practices over reactive methods, but we note that the correlational design of our study has no implications for the possible causal effects of these methods. Questionnaire scores were strongly associated with self-reported happiness and also significantly associated with personal success, professional success, and general level of stress. Data were collected between 2007 and 2022, but we found no effect for time. The study supports the value of stress-management training, and it also suggests that moderate levels of stress may not be as beneficial as previously thought.

摘要

本研究的主要目的是确定四项认知行为能力的相对价值,这些能力在实证研究中被证明与有效的压力管理有关。基于对相关心理学文献的回顾,我们将这些能力命名为:管理或减少压力源、管理思维、计划和预防、以及练习放松技巧。我们通过检查来自 125 个国家的 18895 名讲英语的参与者(65.0%来自美国和加拿大)完成的一项新的压力管理能力清单中获得的数据来衡量它们的相对价值。我们采用同时进行的研究设计来评估它们的相对价值,这也使我们能够评估新工具的有效性。回归分析用于根据四项能力对理想结果的预测能力对其进行排序。回归和因素分析都指出了积极主动的压力管理实践比被动反应方法更重要,但我们注意到,我们研究的相关设计对这些方法的可能因果效应没有影响。问卷得分与自我报告的幸福感高度相关,也与个人成功、职业成功和一般压力水平显著相关。数据收集于 2007 年至 2022 年之间,但我们没有发现时间的影响。该研究支持压力管理培训的价值,也表明适度的压力可能不像以前认为的那样有益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73a5/11333707/eb79ab97c86e/41598_2024_68328_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验