Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5824-5831. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11156-4. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is recommended for upper-third gastric cancer and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer, preserving organ function while reducing postoperative symptoms. The double-flap technique (DFT) is one approach to minimize reflux after PG. However, laparoscopic PG with DFT (LPG-DFT) has drawbacks of increased complexity, such as hand sutures for anastomosis. Robotic surgery offers potential advantages for DFT reconstruction, but the safety of robotic DFT following PG (RPG-DFT) in the introductory phase is unknown.
This retrospective study compared the outcomes of RPG-DFT with LPG-DFT. Data from 402 patients (321 LPG-DFT, 81 RPG-DFT) between 2009 and 2023 were analyzed. Propensity score matching balanced patient demographics and tumor characteristics. Surgical parameters, complications, and long-term outcomes were assessed.
The surgery time of LPG-DFT has stabilized in patients since 2016. Thus, LPG-DFT from 2016 was defined as a stable procedure. RPG-DFT was started in 2019, after minimally invasive DFT reconstruction had been mastered at our center. Therefore, we compared the surgical outcomes of introductory RPG-DFT with stable LPG-DFT. Matched analysis revealed that RPG-DFT in the introductory phase had significantly longer surgery times but less bleeding and shorter reconstruction times and hospital stays than stable LPG-DFT. Frequencies of short-term complications and reflux esophagitis were comparable in both groups. Although RPG-DFT in the introductory phase exhibited higher incidence of anastomotic stenosis than stable LPG-DFT, the incidence of anastomotic stenosis decreased over time.
This study demonstrated the safety of RPG-DFT in the introductory phase for EGJ and upper-third stomach tumors, with outcomes comparable to stable LPG-DFT. RPG-DFT offers shorter reconstruction time and less blood loss compared with LPG-DFT. However, anastomotic stenosis is a complication to monitor in early robotic surgery.
近端胃切除术(PG)适用于胃上部三分之一和食管胃结合部(EGJ)癌症,保留器官功能的同时减轻术后症状。双瓣技术(DFT)是减少 PG 后反流的一种方法。然而,腹腔镜 PG 加 DFT(LPG-DFT)存在吻合手缝等复杂性增加的缺点。机器人手术为 DFT 重建提供了潜在优势,但在引入阶段,PG 后机器人 DFT(RPG-DFT)的安全性尚不清楚。
本回顾性研究比较了 RPG-DFT 与 LPG-DFT 的结果。分析了 2009 年至 2023 年间 402 例患者(321 例 LPG-DFT,81 例 RPG-DFT)的数据。采用倾向评分匹配平衡患者的人口统计学和肿瘤特征。评估了手术参数、并发症和长期结果。
自 2016 年以来,LPG-DFT 的手术时间在患者中已经稳定。因此,2016 年的 LPG-DFT 被定义为稳定的手术。RPG-DFT 于 2019 年开始,在此之前,我们中心已经掌握了微创 DFT 重建。因此,我们比较了引入阶段的 RPG-DFT 与稳定的 LPG-DFT 的手术结果。匹配分析显示,在引入阶段的 RPG-DFT 具有显著更长的手术时间,但出血量较少,重建时间和住院时间较短。两组短期并发症和反流性食管炎的发生率相当。虽然在引入阶段的 RPG-DFT 吻合口狭窄的发生率高于稳定的 LPG-DFT,但随着时间的推移,吻合口狭窄的发生率有所下降。
本研究表明,EGJ 和胃上部肿瘤的引入阶段的 RPG-DFT 是安全的,结果与稳定的 LPG-DFT 相当。与 LPG-DFT 相比,RPG-DFT 具有更短的重建时间和更少的出血量。然而,吻合口狭窄是早期机器人手术中需要监测的并发症。