Department of Interventional Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, No. 106 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Department of Interventional Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Aug 19;24(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03357-x.
Whether endobiliary radiofrequency ablation (EB-RFA) changes the standard role of stent placement in treating unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) remains unclear. The aim of this study is to compare percutaneous EB-RFA and metal stent placement (RFA-Stent) with metal stent placement alone (Stent) in treating unresectable MBO using a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.
From June 2013 to June 2018, clinical data from 163 patients with malignant biliary obstruction who underwent percutaneous RFA-Stent or stenting alone were retrospectively analyzed using a nearest-neighbor algorithm to one-to-one PSM analysis to compare primary and secondary stent patency (PSP, SSP), overall survival (OS) and complications between the two groups.
Before matching, for whole patients, RFA-Stent resulted in longer median PSP (8.0 vs. 5.1 months, P = 0.003), SSP (9.8 vs. 5.1 months, P < 0.001) and OS (7.0 vs. 4.5 months, P = 0.034) than the Stent group. After matching (54 pairs), RFA-Stent also resulted in better median PSP (8.5 vs. 5.1 months, P < 0.001), SSP (11.0 vs. 6.0 months, P < 0.001), and OS (8.0 vs. 4.0 months, P = 0.007) than Stent. RFA-Stent was comparable with Stent for complication rates. In Cox analysis, RFA-Stent modality and serum total bilirubin level were independent prognostic factors for PSP. RFA-Stent modality, performance status score and combination therapy after stent were independent prognostic factors for OS.
Percutaneous RFA-Stent was superior to Stent in terms of PSP, SSP, and OS in selected patients with unresectable MBO.
经内镜射频消融(EB-RFA)是否改变了治疗不可切除恶性胆道梗阻(MBO)的支架置入的标准作用尚不清楚。本研究旨在通过倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析比较经皮 EB-RFA 联合金属支架置入(RFA-Stent)与单纯金属支架置入(Stent)治疗不可切除的 MBO。
2013 年 6 月至 2018 年 6 月,回顾性分析了 163 例经皮 RFA-Stent 或单纯支架置入治疗恶性胆道梗阻的患者的临床资料。采用最近邻算法进行 1:1 的 PSM 分析,比较两组患者的主要和次要支架通畅率(PSP、SSP)、总生存期(OS)和并发症。
在匹配前,对于所有患者,RFA-Stent 组的中位 PSP(8.0 个月 vs. 5.1 个月,P=0.003)、SSP(9.8 个月 vs. 5.1 个月,P<0.001)和 OS(7.0 个月 vs. 4.5 个月,P=0.034)均长于支架组。匹配后(54 对),RFA-Stent 组的中位 PSP(8.5 个月 vs. 5.1 个月,P<0.001)、SSP(11.0 个月 vs. 6.0 个月,P<0.001)和 OS(8.0 个月 vs. 4.0 个月,P=0.007)也均长于支架组。RFA-Stent 组的并发症发生率与支架组相当。在 Cox 分析中,RFA-Stent 方式和血清总胆红素水平是 PSP 的独立预后因素。RFA-Stent 方式、表现状态评分和支架后联合治疗是 OS 的独立预后因素。
在选择的不可切除 MBO 患者中,经皮 RFA-Stent 在 PSP、SSP 和 OS 方面优于支架。