Mai Lang, Liu Yankui, Zhu Ruijue, Zhou Pan, Di Jiawei, Yang Junlin, Huang Zifang, He Lei
Department of Spine Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Scoliosis Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 31;26(1):739. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08974-5.
To explore the role of intraoperative prone lumbar fluoroscopy under anesthesia in guiding lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) selection in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with lumbar structural curves and its subsequent impact on surgical outcomes.pap.
This retrospective cohort study included 45 AIS patients with lumbar structural curves who underwent posterior spinal deformity correction surgery at the Scoliosis Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between 2020 and 2022.The reduced group refers to the choice of a more superior LIV based on intraoperative lumbar fluoroscopy in the prone position, resulting in fewer fused levels than the preoperative plan, while the non-reduced group leaves the preoperative plan unchanged.We analyzed the demographic information, radiographic data, surgical parameters (including curve correction rates, coronal and sagittal balance, and LIV-related parameters), and complication rates, with statistical significance set at < 0.05.
In the reduced group, 57.8% of patients had a reduced number of fused levels. When compared to the non-reduced group, there were no significant differences in the major curve correction rate (the reduced group: 77.6%, the non-reduced group: 71.7%, = 0.95), coronal balance at final follow-up ( = 0.97), or sagittal balance at final follow-up ( = 0.64), with at least 2 years of follow-up (average 33.3 ± 15.6 months). Postoperative LIV-related parameters, including tilt angle, rotation, and the distance from the center sacral vertical line (CSVL), showed no significant differences between the two groups ( > 0.05). All patients achieved satisfactory postoperative correction, with no adverse events or revision surgeries required due to distal junctional issues.
Intraoperative prone lumbar fluoroscopy under anesthesia provides precise guidance for LIV selection, reducing the number of fused levels without compromising curve correction or overall spinal balance. This technique is both safe and effective, helping to optimize AIS surgical outcomes while preserving lumbar mobility. Further multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings and assess their long-term functional impact.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-025-08974-5.
探讨麻醉下术中俯卧位腰椎透视在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)腰椎结构性侧弯患者中指导选择最低融合椎体(LIV)的作用及其对手术效果的后续影响。
这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2020年至2022年间在中山大学附属第三医院脊柱侧弯中心接受后路脊柱畸形矫正手术的45例AIS腰椎结构性侧弯患者。减少组是指基于术中俯卧位腰椎透视选择更上位的LIV,导致融合节段比术前计划更少,而非减少组则保持术前计划不变。我们分析了人口统计学信息、影像学数据、手术参数(包括侧弯矫正率、冠状面和矢状面平衡以及与LIV相关的参数)和并发症发生率,设定统计学显著性为<0.05。
在减少组中,57.8%的患者融合节段数量减少。与非减少组相比,在至少2年的随访(平均33.3±15.6个月)中,主弯矫正率(减少组:77.6%,非减少组:71.7%,=0.95)、末次随访时的冠状面平衡(=0.97)或矢状面平衡(=0.64)均无显著差异。术后与LIV相关的参数,包括倾斜角、旋转度以及距骶骨中心垂直线(CSVL)的距离,两组之间无显著差异(>0.05)。所有患者术后矫正效果均令人满意,未因远端交界区问题发生不良事件或需要翻修手术。
麻醉下术中俯卧位腰椎透视为LIV选择提供了精确指导,减少了融合节段数量,同时不影响侧弯矫正或整体脊柱平衡。该技术安全有效,有助于优化AIS手术效果,同时保留腰椎活动度。需要进一步的多中心研究来验证这些发现并评估其长期功能影响。
在线版本包含可在10.1186/s12891-025-08974-5获取的补充材料。