• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用无监督机器学习识别心力衰竭心脏重症监护病房患者的亚表型。

Unsupervised machine learning to identify subphenotypes among cardiac intensive care unit patients with heart failure.

作者信息

Jentzer Jacob C, Reddy Yogesh N V, Soussi Sabri, Crespo-Diaz Ruben, Patel Parag C, Lawler Patrick R, Mebazaa Alexandre, Dunlay Shannon M

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Dec;11(6):4242-4256. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15027. Epub 2024 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1002/ehf2.15027
PMID:39160644
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11631334/
Abstract

AIMS

Hospitalized patients with heart failure (HF) are a heterogeneous population, with multiple phenotypes proposed. Prior studies have not examined the biological phenotypes of critically ill patients with HF admitted to the contemporary cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). We aimed to leverage unsupervised machine learning to identify previously unknown HF phenotypes in a large and diverse cohort of patients with HF admitted to the CICU.

METHODS

We screened 6008 Mayo Clinic CICU patients with an admission diagnosis of HF from 2007 to 2018 and included those without missing values for common laboratory tests. Consensus k-means clustering was performed based on 10 common admission laboratory values (potassium, chloride, anion gap, blood urea nitrogen, haemoglobin, red blood cell distribution width, mean corpuscular volume, platelet count, white blood cell count and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio). In-hospital mortality was evaluated using logistic regression, and 1 year mortality was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models after multivariable adjustment.

RESULTS

Among 4877 CICU patients with HF who had complete admission laboratory data (mean age 69.4 years, 38.4% females), we identified five clusters with divergent demographics, comorbidities, laboratory values, admission diagnoses and use of critical care therapies. We labelled these clusters based on the characteristic laboratory profile of each group: uncomplicated (25.7%), iron-deficient (14.5%), cardiorenal (18.4%), inflamed (22.3%) and hypoperfused (19.2%). In-hospital mortality occurred in 10.7% and differed between the phenotypes: uncomplicated, 2.7% (reference); iron-deficient, 8.1% [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.18 (1.38-3.48), P < 0.001]; cardiorenal, 10.3% [adjusted OR 2.11 (1.37-3.32), P < 0.001]; inflamed, 12.5% [adjusted OR 1.79 (1.18-2.76), P = 0.007]; and hypoperfused, 21.9% [adjusted OR 4.32 (2.89-6.62), P < 0.001]. These differences in mortality between phenotypes were consistent when patients were stratified based on demographics, aetiology, admission diagnoses, mortality risk scores, shock severity and systolic function. One-year mortality occurred in 31.5% and differed between the phenotypes: uncomplicated, 11.9% (reference); inflamed, 26.8% [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.56 (1.27-1.92), P < 0.001]; iron-deficient, 33.8% [adjusted HR 2.47 (2.00-3.04), P < 0.001]; cardiorenal, 41.2% [adjusted HR 2.41 (1.97-2.95), P < 0.001]; and hypoperfused, 52.3% [adjusted HR 3.43 (2.82-4.18), P < 0.001]. Similar findings were observed for post-discharge 1 year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Unsupervised machine learning clustering can identify multiple distinct clinical HF phenotypes within the CICU population that display differing mortality profiles both in-hospital and at 1 year. Mortality was lowest for the uncomplicated HF phenotype and highest for the hypoperfused phenotype. The inflamed phenotype had comparatively higher in-hospital mortality yet lower post-discharge mortality, suggesting divergent short-term and long-term prognosis.

摘要

目的

心力衰竭(HF)住院患者是一个异质性群体,有多种已提出的表型。既往研究未对当代心脏重症监护病房(CICU)收治的重症HF患者的生物学表型进行研究。我们旨在利用无监督机器学习,在入住CICU的大量、多样的HF患者队列中识别先前未知的HF表型。

方法

我们筛选了2007年至2018年梅奥诊所CICU中入院诊断为HF的6008例患者,并纳入了常见实验室检查无缺失值的患者。基于10项常见的入院实验室值(钾、氯、阴离子间隙、血尿素氮、血红蛋白、红细胞分布宽度、平均红细胞体积、血小板计数、白细胞计数和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值)进行共识k均值聚类。使用逻辑回归评估院内死亡率,并在多变量调整后使用Cox比例风险模型评估1年死亡率。

结果

在4877例有完整入院实验室数据的CICU HF患者中(平均年龄69.4岁,38.4%为女性),我们识别出五个聚类,其人口统计学、合并症、实验室值、入院诊断和重症监护治疗的使用情况各不相同。我们根据每组的特征实验室特征对这些聚类进行了标记:无并发症(25.7%)、缺铁(14.5%)、心肾(18.4%)、炎症(22.3%)和灌注不足(19.2%)。院内死亡率为10.7%,不同表型之间存在差异:无并发症,2.7%(参照);缺铁,8.1%[调整优势比(OR)2.18(1.38 - 3.48),P < 0.001];心肾,10.3%[调整OR 2.11(1.37 - 3.32),P < 0.001];炎症,12.5%[调整OR 1.79(1.18 - 2.76),P = 0.007];灌注不足,21.9%[调整OR 4.32(2.89 - 6.62),P < 0.001]。当根据人口统计学、病因、入院诊断、死亡风险评分、休克严重程度和收缩功能对患者进行分层时,表型之间的这些死亡率差异是一致的。1年死亡率为31.5%,不同表型之间存在差异:无并发症,11.9%(参照);炎症,26.8%[调整风险比(HR)1.56(1.27 - 1.92),P < 0.001];缺铁,33.8%[调整HR 2.47(2.00 - 3.04),P < 0.001];心肾,41.2%[调整HR 2.41(1.97 - 2.95),P < 0.001];灌注不足,52.3%[调整HR 3.43(2.82 - 4.18),P < 0.001]。出院后1年死亡率也观察到类似结果。

结论

无监督机器学习聚类可在CICU人群中识别出多种不同的临床HF表型,这些表型在院内和1年时显示出不同的死亡率特征。无并发症HF表型的死亡率最低,灌注不足表型的死亡率最高。炎症表型的院内死亡率相对较高,但出院后死亡率较低,提示短期和长期预后不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ae/11631334/96a9adbd2f01/EHF2-11-4242-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ae/11631334/a6cb0e071bcf/EHF2-11-4242-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ae/11631334/f08b4cf2f372/EHF2-11-4242-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ae/11631334/49cf6cdb4696/EHF2-11-4242-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ae/11631334/decef903d870/EHF2-11-4242-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ae/11631334/042b3c20f85d/EHF2-11-4242-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ae/11631334/96a9adbd2f01/EHF2-11-4242-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ae/11631334/a6cb0e071bcf/EHF2-11-4242-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ae/11631334/f08b4cf2f372/EHF2-11-4242-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ae/11631334/49cf6cdb4696/EHF2-11-4242-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ae/11631334/decef903d870/EHF2-11-4242-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ae/11631334/042b3c20f85d/EHF2-11-4242-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ae/11631334/96a9adbd2f01/EHF2-11-4242-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Unsupervised machine learning to identify subphenotypes among cardiac intensive care unit patients with heart failure.使用无监督机器学习识别心力衰竭心脏重症监护病房患者的亚表型。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Dec;11(6):4242-4256. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15027. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
2
Validation of cardiogenic shock phenotypes in a mixed cardiac intensive care unit population.在混合心脏重症监护病房人群中对心源性休克表型的验证。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Mar;99(4):1006-1014. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30103. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
3
Predictive Value of the Get With The Guidelines Heart Failure Risk Score in Unselected Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients.指南指导下心力衰竭风险评分在未选择的心脏重症监护病房患者中的预测价值。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Feb 4;9(3):e012439. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012439. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
4
Outcomes and Predictors of Mortality Among Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients With Heart Failure.心力衰竭心脏重症监护病房患者的死亡率及其预测因素。
J Card Fail. 2022 Jul;28(7):1088-1099. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.02.015. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
5
Admission Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention shock stage stratifies post-discharge mortality risk in cardiac intensive care unit patients.收治入院时的休克阶段会使心血管造影及介入治疗学会对心脏重症监护病房患者的出院后死亡率风险进行分层。
Am Heart J. 2020 Jan;219:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.10.012. Epub 2019 Oct 27.
6
Shock in the cardiac intensive care unit: Changes in epidemiology and prognosis over time.心脏重症监护病房中的休克:随时间变化的流行病学和预后变化。
Am Heart J. 2021 Feb;232:94-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.10.054. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
7
Demographics, Care Patterns, and Outcomes of Patients Admitted to Cardiac Intensive Care Units: The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Prospective North American Multicenter Registry of Cardiac Critical Illness.心脏重症监护病房患者的人口统计学、护理模式和结局:重症心脏病学试验网络前瞻性北美多中心心脏危重症登记研究。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Sep 1;4(9):928-935. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.2467.
8
Noninvasive Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Stroke Work Index Predicts Mortality in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients.经胸超声心动图左心室搏功指数预测心脏重症监护病房患者的死亡率。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Nov;13(11):e011642. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.011642. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
9
Age and shock severity predict mortality in cardiac intensive care unit patients with and without heart failure.年龄和休克严重程度可预测心脏重症监护病房中伴或不伴心力衰竭患者的死亡率。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Dec;7(6):3971-3982. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12995. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
10
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Is Associated With Increased Mortality Across the Spectrum of Shock Severity in Cardiac Intensive Care Patients.全身炎症反应综合征与心脏重症监护患者休克严重程度范围内死亡率增加相关。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Dec;13(12):e006956. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006956. Epub 2020 Dec 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine Learning Approaches for Phenotyping in Cardiogenic Shock and Critical Illness: Part 2 of 2.用于心源性休克和危重症表型分析的机器学习方法:第2部分(共2部分)
JACC Adv. 2022 Oct 28;1(4):100126. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100126. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Risk Prediction for Heart Failure Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: Insights From REVeAL-HF.重症监护病房中心力衰竭患者的风险预测:来自REVeAL-HF研究的见解
JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Jun;11(6):727-728. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.01.021. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
3
Advanced Heart Failure in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit: A Community-Based Study.
心脏重症监护病房中的晚期心力衰竭:一项基于社区的研究。
JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;11(2):252-254. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.11.022.
4
Machine learning to define phenotypes and outcomes of patients hospitalized for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Findings from ASCEND-HF.机器学习定义射血分数保留的心力衰竭住院患者的表型和结局:来自 ASCEND-HF 的结果。
Am Heart J. 2022 Dec;254:112-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.08.009. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
5
Phenotypes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and effect of spironolactone treatment.射血分数保留型心力衰竭的表型及螺内酯治疗的效果。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Aug;9(4):2567-2575. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13969. Epub 2022 May 19.
6
Outcomes and Predictors of Mortality Among Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients With Heart Failure.心力衰竭心脏重症监护病房患者的死亡率及其预测因素。
J Card Fail. 2022 Jul;28(7):1088-1099. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.02.015. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
7
A pragmatic lab-based tool for risk assessment in cardiac critical care: data from the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry.一种基于实用实验室的心脏危重病风险评估工具:来自Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network(CCCTN)注册中心的数据。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2022 Mar 16;11(3):252-257. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuac012.
8
Validation of cardiogenic shock phenotypes in a mixed cardiac intensive care unit population.在混合心脏重症监护病房人群中对心源性休克表型的验证。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Mar;99(4):1006-1014. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30103. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
9
Peripheral blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with mortality across the spectrum of cardiogenic shock severity.外周血中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值与心源性休克严重程度范围内的死亡率相关。
J Crit Care. 2022 Apr;68:50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.12.005. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
10
Phenotyping Cardiogenic Shock.心原性休克表型。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 20;10(14):e020085. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020085. Epub 2021 Jul 6.