Jentzer Jacob C, Reddy Yogesh N V, Soussi Sabri, Crespo-Diaz Ruben, Patel Parag C, Lawler Patrick R, Mebazaa Alexandre, Dunlay Shannon M
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Dec;11(6):4242-4256. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15027. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
Hospitalized patients with heart failure (HF) are a heterogeneous population, with multiple phenotypes proposed. Prior studies have not examined the biological phenotypes of critically ill patients with HF admitted to the contemporary cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). We aimed to leverage unsupervised machine learning to identify previously unknown HF phenotypes in a large and diverse cohort of patients with HF admitted to the CICU.
We screened 6008 Mayo Clinic CICU patients with an admission diagnosis of HF from 2007 to 2018 and included those without missing values for common laboratory tests. Consensus k-means clustering was performed based on 10 common admission laboratory values (potassium, chloride, anion gap, blood urea nitrogen, haemoglobin, red blood cell distribution width, mean corpuscular volume, platelet count, white blood cell count and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio). In-hospital mortality was evaluated using logistic regression, and 1 year mortality was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models after multivariable adjustment.
Among 4877 CICU patients with HF who had complete admission laboratory data (mean age 69.4 years, 38.4% females), we identified five clusters with divergent demographics, comorbidities, laboratory values, admission diagnoses and use of critical care therapies. We labelled these clusters based on the characteristic laboratory profile of each group: uncomplicated (25.7%), iron-deficient (14.5%), cardiorenal (18.4%), inflamed (22.3%) and hypoperfused (19.2%). In-hospital mortality occurred in 10.7% and differed between the phenotypes: uncomplicated, 2.7% (reference); iron-deficient, 8.1% [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.18 (1.38-3.48), P < 0.001]; cardiorenal, 10.3% [adjusted OR 2.11 (1.37-3.32), P < 0.001]; inflamed, 12.5% [adjusted OR 1.79 (1.18-2.76), P = 0.007]; and hypoperfused, 21.9% [adjusted OR 4.32 (2.89-6.62), P < 0.001]. These differences in mortality between phenotypes were consistent when patients were stratified based on demographics, aetiology, admission diagnoses, mortality risk scores, shock severity and systolic function. One-year mortality occurred in 31.5% and differed between the phenotypes: uncomplicated, 11.9% (reference); inflamed, 26.8% [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.56 (1.27-1.92), P < 0.001]; iron-deficient, 33.8% [adjusted HR 2.47 (2.00-3.04), P < 0.001]; cardiorenal, 41.2% [adjusted HR 2.41 (1.97-2.95), P < 0.001]; and hypoperfused, 52.3% [adjusted HR 3.43 (2.82-4.18), P < 0.001]. Similar findings were observed for post-discharge 1 year mortality.
Unsupervised machine learning clustering can identify multiple distinct clinical HF phenotypes within the CICU population that display differing mortality profiles both in-hospital and at 1 year. Mortality was lowest for the uncomplicated HF phenotype and highest for the hypoperfused phenotype. The inflamed phenotype had comparatively higher in-hospital mortality yet lower post-discharge mortality, suggesting divergent short-term and long-term prognosis.
心力衰竭(HF)住院患者是一个异质性群体,有多种已提出的表型。既往研究未对当代心脏重症监护病房(CICU)收治的重症HF患者的生物学表型进行研究。我们旨在利用无监督机器学习,在入住CICU的大量、多样的HF患者队列中识别先前未知的HF表型。
我们筛选了2007年至2018年梅奥诊所CICU中入院诊断为HF的6008例患者,并纳入了常见实验室检查无缺失值的患者。基于10项常见的入院实验室值(钾、氯、阴离子间隙、血尿素氮、血红蛋白、红细胞分布宽度、平均红细胞体积、血小板计数、白细胞计数和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值)进行共识k均值聚类。使用逻辑回归评估院内死亡率,并在多变量调整后使用Cox比例风险模型评估1年死亡率。
在4877例有完整入院实验室数据的CICU HF患者中(平均年龄69.4岁,38.4%为女性),我们识别出五个聚类,其人口统计学、合并症、实验室值、入院诊断和重症监护治疗的使用情况各不相同。我们根据每组的特征实验室特征对这些聚类进行了标记:无并发症(25.7%)、缺铁(14.5%)、心肾(18.4%)、炎症(22.3%)和灌注不足(19.2%)。院内死亡率为10.7%,不同表型之间存在差异:无并发症,2.7%(参照);缺铁,8.1%[调整优势比(OR)2.18(1.38 - 3.48),P < 0.001];心肾,10.3%[调整OR 2.11(1.37 - 3.32),P < 0.001];炎症,12.5%[调整OR 1.79(1.18 - 2.76),P = 0.007];灌注不足,21.9%[调整OR 4.32(2.89 - 6.62),P < 0.001]。当根据人口统计学、病因、入院诊断、死亡风险评分、休克严重程度和收缩功能对患者进行分层时,表型之间的这些死亡率差异是一致的。1年死亡率为31.5%,不同表型之间存在差异:无并发症,11.9%(参照);炎症,26.8%[调整风险比(HR)1.56(1.27 - 1.92),P < 0.001];缺铁,33.8%[调整HR 2.47(2.00 - 3.04),P < 0.001];心肾,41.2%[调整HR 2.41(1.97 - 2.95),P < 0.001];灌注不足,52.3%[调整HR 3.43(2.82 - 4.18),P < 0.001]。出院后1年死亡率也观察到类似结果。
无监督机器学习聚类可在CICU人群中识别出多种不同的临床HF表型,这些表型在院内和1年时显示出不同的死亡率特征。无并发症HF表型的死亡率最低,灌注不足表型的死亡率最高。炎症表型的院内死亡率相对较高,但出院后死亡率较低,提示短期和长期预后不同。