• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国军事医疗体系中基于模拟的培训现状调查。

Survey of Current Simulation Based Training in the US Military Health System.

机构信息

Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc., Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA.

School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.

出版信息

Mil Med. 2024 Aug 19;189(Suppl 3):423-430. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usae147.

DOI:10.1093/milmed/usae147
PMID:39160867
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Simulation-based medical training has been shown to be effective and is widely used in civilian hospitals; however, it is unclear how widely and how effectively simulation is utilized in the U.S. Military Health System (MHS). The current operational state of medical simulation in the MHS is unknown, and there remains a need for a system-wide assessment of whether and how the advances in simulation-based medical training are employed to meet the evolving needs of the present-day warfighter. Understanding the types of skills and methods used within simulation programs across the enterprise is important data for leaders as they plan for the future in terms of curriculum development and the investment of resources. The aim of the present study is to survey MHS simulation programs in order to determine the prevalence of skills taught, the types of learners served, and the most common methodologies employed in this worldwide health care system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of simulation activities was distributed to the medical directors of all 93 simulation programs in the MHS. The survey was developed by the authors based on lists of critical wartime skills published by the medical departments of the US Army, Navy, and Air Force. Respondents were asked to indicate the types of learners trained at their program, which of the 82 unique skills included in the survey are trained at their site, and for each skill the modalities of simulation used, i.e., mannequin, standardized patients, part task trainers, augmented/virtual reality tools, or cadaver/live tissue.

RESULTS

Complete survey responses were obtained from 75 of the 93 (80%) MHS medical simulation training programs. Across all skills included in the survey, those most commonly taught belonged predominantly to the categories of medic skills and nursing skills. Across all sites, the most common category of learner was the medic/corpsman (95% of sites), followed by nurses (87%), physicians (83%), non-medical combat lifesavers (59%), and others (28%) that included on-base first responders, law enforcement, fire fighters, and civilians. The skills training offered by programs included most commonly the tasks associated with medics/corpsmen (97%) followed by nursing (81%), advanced provider (77%), and General Medical Officer (GMO) skills (47%).

CONCLUSION

The survey demonstrated that the most common skills taught were all related to point of injury combat casualty care and addressed the most common causes of death on the battlefield. The availability of training in medic skills, nursing skills, and advanced provider skills were similar in small, medium, and large programs. However, medium and small programs were less likely to deliver training for advanced providers and GMOs compared to larger programs. Overall, this study found that simulation-based medical training in the MHS is focused on medic and nursing skills, and that large programs are more likely to offer training for advanced providers and GMOs. Potential gaps in the availability of existing training are identified as over 50% of skills included in the nursing, advanced provider, and GMO skill categories are not covered by at least 80% of sites serving those learners.

摘要

简介

基于模拟的医学培训已被证明是有效的,并且在民用医院中得到广泛应用;然而,在美国军事卫生系统(MHS)中,模拟的使用范围和效果如何还不清楚。目前,MHS 中的医学模拟的运行状态尚不清楚,仍然需要对基于模拟的医学培训的进步是否以及如何用于满足当今作战人员不断变化的需求进行全面评估。了解整个企业中模拟计划中使用的技能和方法的类型对于领导者来说很重要,因为他们需要根据课程开发和资源投入来规划未来。本研究的目的是调查 MHS 中的模拟计划,以确定所教授的技能的流行程度、所服务的学习者的类型以及在这个全球医疗保健系统中使用的最常见方法。

材料和方法

对 MHS 中的 93 个模拟计划的医疗主任进行了横断面调查。该调查是由作者根据美国陆军、海军和空军的医疗部门发布的关键战时技能清单制定的。受访者被要求指出在其计划中培训的学习者类型,调查中包含的 82 项独特技能中哪些在其现场培训,以及对于每项技能,使用的模拟方式,即人体模型、标准化患者、部分任务培训器、增强/虚拟现实工具或尸体/活体组织。

结果

从 MHS 的 93 个(80%)医学模拟培训计划中获得了完整的调查回复。在调查中包含的所有技能中,最常教授的那些主要属于军医和护理技能类别。在所有地点中,最常见的学习者类别是军医/护理员(95%的地点),其次是护士(87%)、医生(83%)、非医疗战斗救生员(59%)和其他人员(28%),包括基地急救人员、执法人员、消防员和平民。计划提供的技能培训最常包括与军医/护理员相关的任务(97%),其次是护理(81%)、高级提供者(77%)和普通医疗官(GMO)技能(47%)。

结论

该调查表明,最常教授的技能都与受伤点的战场伤员救治有关,并且针对战场上最常见的死亡原因。小型、中型和大型计划中提供的军医技能、护理技能和高级提供者技能培训类似。然而,与大型计划相比,中型和小型计划更不可能为高级提供者和 GMO 提供培训。总体而言,这项研究发现,MHS 中的基于模拟的医学培训侧重于军医和护理技能,并且大型计划更有可能为高级提供者和 GMO 提供培训。已经确定了现有培训的可用性方面的潜在差距,因为包括护理、高级提供者和 GMO 技能类别中的 50%以上的技能至少有 80%的服务于这些学习者的地点没有涵盖。

相似文献

1
Survey of Current Simulation Based Training in the US Military Health System.美国军事医疗体系中基于模拟的培训现状调查。
Mil Med. 2024 Aug 19;189(Suppl 3):423-430. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usae147.
2
Comparing Capabilities of Simulation Modalities for Training Combat Casualty Care: Perspectives of Combat Medics.比较用于训练战斗伤员救治的模拟模式的能力:战斗军医的观点。
Mil Med. 2024 Jul 3;189(7-8):e1738-e1744. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad460.
3
An Evaluation of Navy En Route Care Training Using a High-Fidelity Medical Simulation Scenario of Interfacility Patient Transport.使用设施间患者转运的高保真医学模拟场景对海军途中护理培训进行的评估。
Mil Med. 2018 Sep 1;183(9-10):e383-e391. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usx129.
4
Simulation Training for Operational Medicine Providers (STOMP): Impact of a Comprehensive Skills-Based Curriculum for Military General Medical Officers.作战医学人员模拟训练(STOMP):针对军队普通军医的综合技能课程的影响
Mil Med. 2019 May 1;184(5-6):e141-e146. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy346.
5
Evaluating Medic Performance in Combat Casualty Care Simulation and Training: A Scoping Review of Prospective Research.评估战斗伤员护理模拟与训练中的医疗人员表现:前瞻性研究的范围综述
Mil Med. 2023 Jul 22;188(7-8):e1664-e1672. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac250.
6
Updating the Military Unique Curriculum for a Ready Medical Force.更新面向随时待命医疗部队的军事特色课程。
Mil Med. 2024 May 18;189(5-6):1181-1189. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad099.
7
Simulation Training for Operational Medicine Providers (STOMP): Design and Implementation of a Novel Comprehensive Skills-Based Curriculum for Military General Medical Officers.作战医学人员模拟训练(STOMP):面向军队普通军医的新型综合技能课程的设计与实施
Mil Med. 2018 Mar 1;183(suppl_1):40-46. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usx140.
8
Predeployment training of Army medics assigned to prehospital settings.分配到院前环境的陆军医务人员的部署前培训。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Aug 1;91(2S Suppl 2):S130-S138. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003297.
9
A Deeper Dive Into Combat Medic Training.深入了解战斗医疗兵培训。
Mil Med. 2023 Jul 22;188(7-8):187-189. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad050.
10
Advancing Readiness Through Military Programs: An Evidence-Based Practice Perspective.通过军事项目提升准备状态:基于循证实践的视角。
Mil Med. 2023 Nov 10;189(Suppl 1):31-38. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad230.