Suppr超能文献

术后复发食管癌患者的放化疗。

Radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for postoperative recurrence in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

机构信息

Integrated Care Management Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Anesthesia Operation Center of West China Hospital/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2024 Aug;13(16):e70108. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70108.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients with postoperative recurrence remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the effects of radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on postoperative recurrence in ESCC patients.

METHODS

Recurrence ESCC patients who received salvage RT and CRT from January 2015 to January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Post-recurrence survival (PRS) and prognostic factors were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models, respectively. Subgroup analyses were performed based on pathological lymph node (LN) status (negative/positive) to evaluate the differences in salvage treatments and toxic reaction.

RESULTS

A total of 170 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 60 years (range 43-77). No significant difference was found in the median PRS between the salvage RT and CRT groups (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that TNM stage III and IV, macroscopic medullary type, and distant metastasis recurrence pattern were independent prognostic factors (all p < 0.05) for PRS. Salvage treatment was not associated with PRS (p = 0.897). However, in patients with negative LN, CRT was associated with prolonged survival (p = 0.043) and had no significant differences in toxic reactions compared to RT (p = 0.924). In addition, RT showed better prognoses (p = 0.020) and lower toxic reactions (p = 0.030) than CRT in patients with positive LNs.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on prognosis and toxic reactions, ESCC recurrence patients with negative LNs could benefit from CRT, but RT should be recommended for patients with positive LNs.

摘要

背景

食管癌术后复发患者的最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。我们旨在评估放疗(RT)和放化疗(CRT)对食管癌术后复发患者的影响。

方法

回顾性分析了 2015 年 1 月至 2019 年 1 月接受挽救性 RT 和 CRT 的复发食管癌患者。采用 Kaplan-Meier 和 Cox 比例风险模型评估复发后生存(PRS)和预后因素。根据病理淋巴结(LN)状态(阴性/阳性)进行亚组分析,以评估挽救治疗和毒性反应的差异。

结果

共纳入 170 例患者,中位年龄为 60 岁(范围 43-77 岁)。挽救性 RT 和 CRT 组的中位 PRS 无显著差异(p>0.05)。多因素分析显示,TNM 分期 III 期和 IV 期、大体髓质型和远处转移复发模式是 PRS 的独立预后因素(均 p<0.05)。挽救治疗与 PRS 无关(p=0.897)。然而,在 LN 阴性的患者中,CRT 与生存延长相关(p=0.043),与 RT 相比,毒性反应无显著差异(p=0.924)。此外,与 CRT 相比,LN 阳性患者中 RT 具有更好的预后(p=0.020)和更低的毒性反应(p=0.030)。

结论

根据预后和毒性反应,LN 阴性的食管癌复发患者可从 CRT 中获益,但 LN 阳性的患者应推荐 RT。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c02/11333533/92d94fd46f91/CAM4-13-e70108-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验