Potestio Luca, Patruno Cataldo, Dastoli Stefano, Brescia Claudio, Napolitano Maddalena
Section of Dermatology Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
J Asthma Allergy. 2024 Aug 14;17:791-799. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S474411. eCollection 2024.
Even if mild forms of atopic dermatitis (AD) are usually well controlled with topical prescription drugs and emollients, the management of severe forms of the disease may be challenging, especially in special populations (SPs). These patients include groups of disadvantaged people (elderly, patients with disabilities and serious medical conditions) who are usually excluded from clinical trials. As a consequence, most of the data about the efficacy and safety of a drug in these patients derives from post-marketing experiences. In this context, the aim of our study was to retrospectively investigate the effectiveness and safety of tralokinumab in the management of AD in SPs.
A 24-weeks retrospective, dual-center study was performed enrolling patients with a diagnosis of moderate-to-severe AD undergoing treatment with tralokinumab at labelled dosage. Disease severity was assessed using Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI), Pruritus-Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score at baseline and after 4 weeks (W4), W16, and W24. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored at the same timepoints. Statistical significance of clinical improvement (EASI, P-NRS, DLQI) at week 4, week 16, and week 24 as compared with baseline was evaluated by using Student's -test, considering significant a p-value <0.05.
Our study enrolling 27 SPs patients showed a significant improvement in EASI and P-NRS since week 4, continuing to improve up to week 24. Similarly, DLQI significantly decreases at each timepoint as compared with baseline. Finally, no AEs were reported during the study period. Of interest, our cohort included oncologic patients, a patient with a history of severe infection, as well as subjects affected by severe neurological, psychiatric, pulmonary, and/or cardiovascular disease.
Our experience showed that tralokinumab is effective and safe in elderly patients and subjects affected by severe comorbidities.
即使轻度特应性皮炎(AD)通常可通过外用处方药和润肤剂得到良好控制,但严重形式的该疾病管理可能具有挑战性,尤其是在特殊人群(SPs)中。这些患者包括弱势群体(老年人、残疾人和患有严重疾病的患者),他们通常被排除在临床试验之外。因此,关于药物在这些患者中的疗效和安全性的大多数数据来自上市后经验。在此背景下,我们研究的目的是回顾性调查曲罗芦单抗治疗特殊人群中AD的有效性和安全性。
进行了一项为期24周的回顾性双中心研究,纳入诊断为中度至重度AD且正在接受曲罗芦单抗标记剂量治疗的患者。在基线以及第4周(W4)、第16周和第24周时,使用湿疹面积和严重程度指数(EASI)、瘙痒数字评定量表(P-NRS)和皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)评分评估疾病严重程度。在相同时间点监测不良事件(AE)。使用学生t检验评估第4周、第16周和第24周时与基线相比临床改善(EASI、P-NRS、DLQI)的统计学显著性,p值<0.05认为具有显著性。
我们纳入27名特殊人群患者的研究显示,自第4周起EASI和P-NRS有显著改善,并持续改善至第24周。同样,与基线相比,各时间点DLQI均显著降低。最后,研究期间未报告不良事件。有趣的是,我们的队列包括肿瘤患者、一名有严重感染史的患者,以及患有严重神经、精神、肺部和/或心血管疾病的受试者。
我们的经验表明,曲罗芦单抗在老年患者和患有严重合并症的受试者中有效且安全。