Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Women's Health and Allied Health Professionals Theme, Medical Unit Allied Health Professionals, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2024 Oct;38(10):775-790. doi: 10.1177/15459683241273402. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
Balance training covers a range of different modalities and complexity levels for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). When evaluating the effects of balance training across different kinds of interventions, determination of the specific intervention content that predict effects are needed.
To investigate the effects of balance training on gait and dynamic balance outcomes.
Four databases were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials involving people with MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score ≤7.5) where at least 50% of the intervention targeted balance control were included. Interventions were categorized based on training types. Risk-of-bias was assessed using the Tool for the Assessment of Study Quality and Reporting in Exercise (TESTEX).
A total of 18 included studies involved 902 people with MS (EDSS range from 0 to 7.5). Interventions evaluated with a balance composite score or a mobility test showed a moderate effect size (ES = 0.46 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.18 to 0.74]; < .01) and a small overall ES (ES = 0.19 [95% CI = 0.01-0.36]; = .04), respectively, across different training types. Stepping and gait speed outcomes showed no effect. Cognitive dual-task training showed a significant effect (ES = 0.81 [95% CI = 0.24 to 1.37]) on subgroup level, when evaluated with a mobility outcome measure. The median TESTEX score on study quality and reporting was 11 (maximum score = 15).
Improvements of balance were found across interventions when measured by balance composite scores and mobility tests, but not when measured by stepping or gait speed outcomes. Large training volume was positively associated with effect on balance. A definition of intensity in balance training is needed for evaluation of its impact on the effect of balance interventions.
平衡训练涵盖了多种不同的方式和复杂程度,适用于患有多发性硬化症(MS)的人群。在评估不同干预措施的平衡训练效果时,需要确定能够预测效果的具体干预内容。
研究平衡训练对步态和动态平衡结果的影响。
系统检索了四个数据库。纳入了涉及多发性硬化症患者(扩展残疾状况量表 [EDSS] 评分≤7.5)的随机对照试验,其中至少 50%的干预措施针对平衡控制。根据训练类型对干预措施进行分类。使用评估运动研究质量和报告的工具(TESTEX)评估偏倚风险。
共有 18 项纳入的研究涉及 902 名多发性硬化症患者(EDSS 范围为 0 至 7.5)。使用平衡综合评分或移动测试评估的干预措施显示出中等效应大小(ES=0.46 [95%置信区间(CI)=0.18 至 0.74];<0.01)和整体较小的 ES(ES=0.19 [95% CI=0.01 至 0.36];=0.04),分别在不同的训练类型之间。步速和步态速度结果没有影响。认知双重任务训练在亚组水平上使用移动结果测量时,显示出显著的效果(ES=0.81 [95% CI=0.24 至 1.37])。研究质量和报告的 TESTEX 中位数评分为 11 分(最高得分为 15 分)。
当使用平衡综合评分和移动测试测量时,发现各种干预措施都能改善平衡,但使用步速或步态速度结果测量时则没有改善。大的训练量与平衡效果呈正相关。需要定义平衡训练的强度,以评估其对平衡干预效果的影响。