Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Department of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Oct 3;12(10):e0073224. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00732-24. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
The Gram staining method differentiates bacteria based on their cell envelope structure, with the monoderm and diderm cell envelope types traditionally being synonymous with Gram-positive and Gram-negative stain results, respectively. Monoderms have a single phospholipid membrane surrounded by a thick layer of peptidoglycan, while diderms have a lipopolysaccharide outer membrane exterior to a thin peptidoglycan layer. The (formerly ) phylum has members with both cell wall types, and recent phylogenetic analyses have shown that monoderm evolved from diderm ancestors on multiple occasions. Here, we compiled Gram staining and ultrastructural data for species with complete genomes to further investigate the evolution of Gram-positive and Gram-negative cell wall types. The results indicate that many deeply branching lineages at the root of phylum stain Gram-negative but do not harbor genes for outer membrane protein or lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis. Phylogenetic reconstructions suggest that several deeply branching species have retained a thin peptidoglycan layer in their cell walls, which was inherited from a diderm ancestor. Taxa with this atypical Gram-negative-staining cell wall structure include the thermophilic anaerobe and members of the and . Using Gram-staining results as a proxy for cell wall thickness, our analysis indicates that several independent peptidoglycan thickening events may have occurred in the evolution of the Gram-positive cell envelope.
In this study, we examined the evolution of bacterial cell envelopes, specifically focusing on Gram-positive and Gram-negative cell wall types in the phylum. Our results indicate that certain bacteria can stain Gram-negative despite having a monoderm cell wall structure, thus challenging the conventional interpretation of Gram-staining results. Our observations also question the assumption that Gram-negative staining is always indicative of a diderm structure. These findings have broader implications for understanding how and when cell walls thicken during the evolution of bacterial cell envelopes.
革兰氏染色法根据其细胞包膜结构区分细菌,传统上单胞壁和双胞壁的细胞包膜类型分别与革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性染色结果同义。单胞壁具有单层磷脂膜,周围有一层厚厚的肽聚糖,而双胞壁则在薄的肽聚糖层外有一层脂多糖外膜。该门的成员具有这两种细胞壁类型,最近的系统发育分析表明,单胞壁多次从双胞壁的祖先进化而来。在这里,我们为具有完整基因组的 属物种编译了革兰氏染色和超微结构数据,以进一步研究革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性细胞壁类型的进化。结果表明,在 门的根部有许多深分支谱系革兰氏染色呈阴性,但不具有外膜蛋白或脂多糖生物合成基因。系统发育重建表明,几个深分支的 物种在其细胞壁中保留了一层薄的肽聚糖层,这是从双胞壁祖先那里继承来的。具有这种非典型革兰氏阴性染色细胞壁结构的分类群包括嗜热厌氧菌 和 和 属的成员。使用革兰氏染色结果作为细胞壁厚度的替代指标,我们的分析表明,在革兰氏阳性细胞包膜的进化过程中,可能发生了几个独立的肽聚糖增厚事件。
在这项研究中,我们研究了细菌细胞包膜的进化,特别是关注 门中的革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性细胞壁类型。我们的结果表明,某些细菌尽管具有单胞壁结构,但可以革兰氏染色阴性,这挑战了革兰氏染色结果的传统解释。我们的观察结果也对革兰氏染色阴性总是指示双胞壁结构的假设提出了质疑。这些发现对理解细菌细胞包膜在进化过程中细胞壁增厚的方式和时间具有更广泛的意义。