• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术治疗拇外翻的临床和影像学结果:开放式与微创式。

Clinical and radiological outcome of surgical hallux valgus correction: open versus minimally invasive.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Havelland Clinic Nauen, Ketzinerstr. 21, 14641, Nauen, Germany.

Centre for Clinical Research, BG Klinikum Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin gGmbH, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Aug;34(6):3329-3337. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04074-7. Epub 2024 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00590-024-04074-7
PMID:39162733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11377684/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hallux valgus (HV) is the most common forefoot deformity. Surgical correction of HV aims to reduce pain, preserve joints, and re-establish foot function while restoring the hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA). Many surgical procedures have been proposed, including open and minimally invasive (MI) techniques. This study aimed to compare the midterm outcomes of open vs. MI procedures and their impact on the duration of surgery, hospital stay, HVA, and IMA post-operatively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and twenty HV patients operated by open or MI surgery between October 2019 and October 2022 were included. One hundred three patients met the inclusion criteria and consented to the study. Patients were prospectively surveyed for foot functionality, post-operative pain, and complications using the AOFAS score. Radiographic measurements of HV angles, length of hospital stay, and surgery duration were analysed.

RESULTS

MI surgery patients had significantly better AOFAS scores (p < 0.001) 12 months post-operatively compared to open surgery. Complication rates were lower in the MI group (3.8% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.001). MI surgery patients also had shorter hospital stays (0.9 ± 0.3 days vs. 2.0 ± 0.0 days) and surgery duration (19.7 ± 2.3 min vs. 80.7 ± 6.8 min). MI surgery was more effective in correcting the IMA but equally effective as open surgery for HVA correction.

CONCLUSION

MI surgery resulted in better patient satisfaction, fewer complications, and more precise correction of IMA values. Moreover, the duration of surgery and hospital stay were significantly lower in patients undergoing MI surgery. Further research is needed to validate these findings in controlled, prospective randomised trials.

摘要

简介

拇外翻(HV)是最常见的前足畸形。HV 的手术矫正旨在减轻疼痛、保护关节、重建足部功能,同时恢复拇外翻角(HVA)和跖骨间角(IMA)。已经提出了许多手术方法,包括开放式和微创(MI)技术。本研究旨在比较开放式和 MI 手术的中期结果及其对手术时间、住院时间、术后 HVA 和 IMA 的影响。

材料和方法

2019 年 10 月至 2022 年 10 月,我们对接受开放式或 MI 手术治疗的 120 例 HV 患者进行了研究。103 例患者符合纳入标准并同意参与研究。使用 AOFAS 评分对患者的足部功能、术后疼痛和并发症进行前瞻性调查。分析 HV 角度、住院时间和手术时间的放射学测量结果。

结果

MI 手术组患者术后 12 个月的 AOFAS 评分明显优于开放式手术组(p<0.001)。MI 组的并发症发生率较低(3.8% vs. 33.3%,p<0.001)。MI 手术组的住院时间(0.9±0.3 天 vs. 2.0±0.0 天)和手术时间(19.7±2.3 分钟 vs. 80.7±6.8 分钟)也较短。MI 手术在矫正 IMA 方面更有效,但在矫正 HVA 方面与开放式手术同样有效。

结论

MI 手术可提高患者满意度,减少并发症,更精确地矫正 IMA 值。此外,MI 手术组患者的手术时间和住院时间明显缩短。需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现,这些发现需要在对照、前瞻性随机试验中得到验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84a/11377684/a4028655689f/590_2024_4074_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84a/11377684/6f7ef6789276/590_2024_4074_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84a/11377684/3f86ab65eda4/590_2024_4074_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84a/11377684/76e95b212e84/590_2024_4074_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84a/11377684/31269fb6ddba/590_2024_4074_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84a/11377684/a4028655689f/590_2024_4074_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84a/11377684/6f7ef6789276/590_2024_4074_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84a/11377684/3f86ab65eda4/590_2024_4074_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84a/11377684/76e95b212e84/590_2024_4074_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84a/11377684/31269fb6ddba/590_2024_4074_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84a/11377684/a4028655689f/590_2024_4074_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical and radiological outcome of surgical hallux valgus correction: open versus minimally invasive.手术治疗拇外翻的临床和影像学结果:开放式与微创式。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Aug;34(6):3329-3337. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04074-7. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
2
Does Minimally Invasive Surgery Provide Better Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Than Open Surgery in the Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.微创外科治疗拇外翻畸形是否优于开放手术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jun 1;481(6):1143-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002471. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
3
Functional and radiographic outcomes of hallux valgus correction by mini-invasive surgery with Reverdin-Isham and Akin percutaneous osteotomies: a longitudinal prospective study with a 48-month follow-up.采用Reverdin-Isham和Akin经皮截骨术的微创手术矫正拇外翻的功能和影像学结果:一项为期48个月随访的纵向前瞻性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Dec 5;11(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0491-x.
4
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Comparing Percutaneous Chevron-Akin Osteotomies vs Open Scarf-Akin Osteotomies for Hallux Valgus.比较经皮 Chevron-Akin 截骨术与开放性 Scarf-Akin 截骨术治疗拇外翻的临床和影像学结果
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Mar;39(3):311-317. doi: 10.1177/1071100717745282. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
5
Radiographic and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive surgery versus open osteotomies for the correction of hallux valgus.微创外科手术与开放截骨术治疗拇外翻的放射学和临床结果。
Int Orthop. 2022 Aug;46(8):1767-1774. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05419-9. Epub 2022 May 5.
6
Minimally invasive versus open chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: a randomized controlled trial.微创与开放 Chevron 截骨术治疗拇外翻:一项随机对照试验。
Int Orthop. 2019 Feb;43(2):343-350. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4006-8. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
7
Minimally invasive surgery for severe hallux valgus in 106 feet.微创治疗 106 例重度拇外翻
Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Jun;28(4):503-509. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2022.01.010. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
8
Radiographic Comparison of Open and Minimally Invasive Distal Chevron Metatarsal Osteotomy in Patients With Hallux Valgus.开放与微创远端跖骨截骨术治疗拇外翻的影像学比较。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2024 May-Jun;63(3):386-391. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2024.01.012. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
9
Preliminary Experience With a Minimally Invasive Technique for Hallux Valgus Correction With No Fixation.微创技术治疗拇外翻矫正术的初步经验,无需固定。
Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Jan;41(1):37-43. doi: 10.1177/1071100719868725. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
10
Midterm results and complications after minimally invasive distal metatarsal osteotomy for treatment of hallux valgus.微创远跖骨截骨术治疗拇外翻的中期结果和并发症。
Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Jul;34(7):969-77. doi: 10.1177/1071100713481453. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Resorbable and Non-Resorbable Osteosynthesis Material in Hallux Surgery: A Systematic Review.拇趾手术中可吸收与不可吸收骨合成材料的比较:一项系统综述
Life (Basel). 2023 Oct 5;13(10):2018. doi: 10.3390/life13102018.
2
Letter to the Editor: Does Minimally Invasive Surgery Provide Better Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Than Open Surgery in the Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.致编辑的信:在治疗拇外翻畸形方面,微创手术比开放手术能提供更好的临床或影像学结果吗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):213-214. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002890. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
3
Global prevalence and incidence of hallux valgus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
全球踇外翻的患病率和发病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2023 Sep 20;16(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00661-9.
4
Republication of "Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity Using a Suture Button Device: A Preliminary Report".《使用缝线纽扣装置治疗拇外翻畸形:初步报告》再版
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2023 Aug 21;8(3):24730114231195342. doi: 10.1177/24730114231195342. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
A modified minimally invasive osteotomy for hallux valgus enables reduction of malpositioned sesamoid bones.改良微创截骨术治疗拇外翻可使错位的籽骨复位。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Oct;143(10):6105-6112. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04868-0. Epub 2023 May 18.
6
Does Minimally Invasive Surgery Provide Better Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Than Open Surgery in the Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.微创外科治疗拇外翻畸形是否优于开放手术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jun 1;481(6):1143-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002471. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
7
Cohort Comparison of Radiographic Correction and Complications Between Minimal Invasive and Open Lapidus Procedures for Hallux Valgus.微创与开放式Lapidus 手术治疗拇外翻的影像学矫正与并发症的队列比较。
Foot Ankle Int. 2022 Oct;43(10):1277-1284. doi: 10.1177/10711007221112088. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
8
Minimally Invasive vs. Open Surgery for Hallux Valgus: A Meta-Analysis.拇外翻的微创手术与开放手术:一项Meta分析
Front Surg. 2022 Mar 21;9:843410. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.843410. eCollection 2022.
9
Percutaneous, MIS and open hallux valgus surgery.经皮、微创和开放式拇外翻手术。
EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Jun 28;6(6):432-438. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210029. eCollection 2021 Jun.
10
Open vs Minimally Invasive Scarf Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus Correction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.开放式与微创 Scarf 截骨术治疗拇外翻:一项随机对照试验。
Foot Ankle Int. 2021 Aug;42(8):982-993. doi: 10.1177/10711007211003565. Epub 2021 May 22.