Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Critical Care Medicine, NMC Specialty Hospital, Al Nahda, Dubai, UAE.
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Oct;50(10):1563-1579. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07578-2. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
PURPOSE: Our study aimed to provide consensus and expert clinical practice statements related to airway management in critically ill adults with a physiologically difficult airway (PDA). METHODS: An international Steering Committee involving seven intensivists and one Delphi methodology expert was convened by the Society of Critical Care Anaesthesiologists (SOCCA) Physiologically Difficult Airway Task Force. The committee selected an international panel of 35 expert clinician-researchers with expertise in airway management in critically ill adults. A Delphi process based on an iterative approach was used to obtain the final consensus statements. RESULTS: The Delphi process included seven survey rounds. A stable consensus was achieved for 53 (87%) out of 61 statements. The experts agreed that in addition to pathophysiological conditions, physiological alterations associated with pregnancy and obesity also constitute a physiologically difficult airway. They suggested having an intubation team consisting of at least three healthcare providers including two airway operators, implementing an appropriately designed checklist, and optimizing hemodynamics prior to tracheal intubation. Similarly, the experts agreed on the head elevated laryngoscopic position, routine use of videolaryngoscopy during the first attempt, preoxygenation with non-invasive ventilation, careful mask ventilation during the apneic phase, and attention to cardiorespiratory status for post-intubation care. CONCLUSION: Using a Delphi method, agreement among a panel of international experts was reached for 53 statements providing guidance to clinicians worldwide on safe tracheal intubation practices in patients with a physiologically difficult airway to help improve patient outcomes. Well-designed studies are needed to assess the effects of these practice statements and address the remaining uncertainties.
目的:本研究旨在就生理困难气道(PDA)危重症成人的气道管理提供共识和专家临床实践声明。
方法:由危重病麻醉医师学会(SOCCA)生理困难气道工作组召集的一个国际指导委员会,由 7 名重症监护医师和 1 名 Delphi 方法专家组成。该委员会选择了 35 名具有危重症成人气道管理专业知识的国际专家临床研究人员组成国际专家小组。采用基于迭代方法的 Delphi 流程获得最终的共识声明。
结果:Delphi 流程包括七轮调查。对于 61 项声明中的 53 项(87%)达成了稳定的共识。专家们一致认为,除了病理生理状况外,与妊娠和肥胖相关的生理改变也构成了生理困难气道。他们建议组成一个由至少三名医疗保健提供者组成的插管团队,其中包括两名气道操作员,实施设计适当的检查表,并在气管插管前优化血液动力学。同样,专家们还就头高位喉镜位、首次尝试时常规使用可视喉镜、使用无创通气进行预氧合、在无通气期小心进行面罩通气以及注意心肺状态以进行插管后护理达成一致。
结论:使用 Delphi 方法,国际专家组就 53 项声明达成了一致,为全球临床医生提供了有关生理困难气道患者安全气管插管实践的指导,以帮助改善患者结局。需要进行精心设计的研究来评估这些实践声明的效果,并解决剩余的不确定性。
Br J Anaesth. 2016-5-24
Anaesthesiologie. 2024-6
Br J Anaesth. 2017-11-26
BMC Emerg Med. 2024-5-27
Intensive Care Med. 2014-5
N Engl J Med. 2024-6-20
Anesth Analg. 2024-4-1
N Engl J Med. 2023-8-3
Crit Care. 2023-4-12