Li Jia Qi, Sun Ting, Zuo Jun Tao, Xu Yao, Cai Li Na, Zheng Heng Yu, Ye Xiang Hong
Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Graduate School, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China.
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Mar;81(3):1172-1183. doi: 10.1111/jan.16384. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
To systematically evaluate and analyse literature concerning the factors influencing the implementation of clinical practice guidelines related to enteral nutrition in the adult intensive care unit.
Guidelines serve as crucial tools for guiding clinical practice. However, a significant gap persists between current clinical practice and guidelines pertaining to enteral nutrition. It is essential to identify the reasons behind this disparity to foster clinical transformation.
A mixed-methods systematic review.
A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane, PsycINFO and CNKI databases to identify impediments and facilitators to the implementation of ICU clinical practice guidelines related to enteral nutrition. The types of studies included quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies. The search spanned from January 2003 to January 2024 and was updated in May 2024. The quality assessment of the included literature was conducted using the Mixed-Methods Study Evaluation Tool (MMAT). Data analysis was performed using a data-based convergent integration approach. The protocol for this study was prospectively registered (PROSPERO2023, CRD42023483287).
Twenty papers were finally included, and 65 findings were extracted, integrating a total of three categories, Category 1: healthcare provider factors, including three sub-themes: knowledge of guideline-related knowledge and awareness of guideline application; social/professional roles and identity domains; beliefs, attitudes and self-efficacy; collaboration, Category 2: practice environments, including two sub-themes: environmental factors and resource areas; systems and behavioural norms, Category 3: patient values and nutritional support preferences including two sub-themes: patient disease status and value orientation.
Healthcare professionals should analyse obstacles and facilitators to guideline implementation from multiple perspectives, strengthen healthcare collaboration, improve education and training systems, correct misperceptions and increase awareness of evidence-based practice.
系统评价和分析有关影响成人重症监护病房肠内营养临床实践指南实施因素的文献。
指南是指导临床实践的关键工具。然而,目前的临床实践与肠内营养指南之间仍存在显著差距。识别这种差异背后的原因对于促进临床转变至关重要。
采用混合方法进行系统评价。
在PubMed、Embase、Medline、Cochrane、PsycINFO和CNKI数据库中进行系统检索,以确定重症监护病房肠内营养临床实践指南实施的阻碍因素和促进因素。研究类型包括定量研究、定性研究和混合方法研究。检索时间跨度为2003年1月至2024年1月,并于2024年5月更新。使用混合方法研究评价工具(MMAT)对纳入文献进行质量评估。采用基于数据的收敛性整合方法进行数据分析。本研究方案已进行前瞻性注册(PROSPERO2023,CRD42023483287)。
最终纳入20篇论文,提取65项研究结果,共整合为三类,第一类:医疗保健提供者因素,包括三个子主题:指南相关知识及指南应用意识;社会/职业角色和身份领域;信念、态度和自我效能感;协作,第二类:实践环境,包括两个子主题:环境因素和资源领域;系统和行为规范,第三类:患者价值观和营养支持偏好,包括两个子主题:患者疾病状况和价值取向。
医疗保健专业人员应从多个角度分析指南实施的障碍和促进因素,加强医疗协作,完善教育和培训体系,纠正误解,提高循证实践意识。