Suppr超能文献

患者与医护人员合作以确保手部卫生合规的经历:一项系统综述。

Patient experiences of partnering with healthcare professionals for hand hygiene compliance: a systematic review.

作者信息

Butenko Samantha, Lockwood Craig, McArthur Alexa

机构信息

1Joanna Briggs Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia 2Royal Adelaide Hospital, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Jun;15(6):1645-1670. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003001.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare-associated infections pose a significant risk to patients in acute healthcare settings such as hospitals. Increasingly, patients are encouraged to be active participants and partner with healthcare professionals to positively influence their own safety and overall experience throughout their healthcare journey. Patient-focused safety initiatives include the empowerment of patients to be active partners with healthcare professionals in order to influence the hand hygiene behaviors and compliance of the healthcare professionals providing care to them. Partnering within the context of healthcare, and between the patient and healthcare professional, can be considered as a general concept that involves the empowerment of patients to participate in their care. Terms used to describe patient partnering within healthcare vary and include patient participation, patient-centeredness, patient empowerment and patient engagement. Although patients appear generally to have positive attitudes and intentions about engaging in their safety and partnering in the healthcare setting, their intentions and actual behaviors vary considerably. Patients appear less likely to engage in behaviors that require questioning of the perceived or real authority of healthcare professionals. A patient's intention and subsequent act of partnering with healthcare professionals for hand hygiene compliance by the healthcare professional are influenced by complex internal, external and social factors as well as cultural, behavioral and systematic factors.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the best available evidence in relation to the experiences of the patient partnering with healthcare professionals for hand hygiene compliance.

INCLUSION CRITERIA TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS

The current review considered qualitative (critical or interpretive) papers that included adult in-patients and healthcare professionals (medical and nursing staff), in the acute hospital-care setting. Adult was considered to be any person aged 18 years or over. It should be noted that consumers in this context were patients and vice versa; the term patient is therefore used throughout this report for consistency.

PHENOMENA OF INTEREST

The current review considered studies that investigated the experience of partnership between patients and healthcare professionals in relation to hand hygiene compliance. This review investigated the phenomena of partnering from both the perspectives of the patient and the healthcare professional.

TYPES OF STUDIES

The current review considered studies that focused on qualitative data including, but not limited to, designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research and feminist research. As qualitative studies were identified and on appraisal found to be of sufficient quality for inclusion, this review did not seek alternate forms of evidence such as text and opinion.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The search strategy aimed to find both published and unpublished studies from 1990 to May 2015. Studies published in English were considered for inclusion in this review.

METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY

Qualitative papers selected for retrieval were assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardized critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-QARI).

DATA EXTRACTION

Qualitative data were extracted from papers included in the review using the standardized data extraction tool from JBI-QARI.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Qualitative research findings were pooled using JBI-QARI.

RESULTS

Following the systematic search and critical appraisal process, three studies were included in the review for data extraction and synthesis of findings. The review process resulted in 29 study findings that were aggregated into seven categories. The categories generated two meta-synthesized findings. The two final synthesized findings were as follows. Synthesized finding 1: Organizational structures enable partnering between healthcare professionals and patients for hand hygiene compliance; however, the culture, beliefs and behaviors of healthcare professionals and patients do not fully support this partnership. Synthesized finding 2: Patients have differing levels of knowledge and balance partnering in hand hygiene against possible detrimental impacts on the caring relationship provided by healthcare professionals, out of concern for their own wellbeing, health outcomes, treatment and/or recovery.

CONCLUSION

The current review highlights the complexity of the patient's experience of partnering with healthcare professionals for hand hygiene compliance. The experiences reported indicated that there is a possible disparity between the healthcare facility and healthcare professionals' promotion and intention of partnering for hand hygiene compliance, and the actual patient's acceptance, participation, partnership, experience and implementation of this initiative. This disconnect between intent and action appears to be influenced by a number of factors including organizational structures as well as drivers such as cultural beliefs and behavior.

摘要

背景

在医院等急性医疗环境中,医疗相关感染对患者构成重大风险。越来越多的患者被鼓励成为积极参与者,并与医疗专业人员合作,以在整个医疗过程中积极影响自身安全和总体体验。以患者为中心的安全举措包括赋予患者权力,使其成为与医疗专业人员合作的积极伙伴,从而影响为其提供护理的医疗专业人员的手卫生行为和依从性。在医疗环境中以及患者与医疗专业人员之间的合作,可以被视为一个总体概念,其中涉及赋予患者参与自身护理的权力。用于描述医疗环境中患者合作的术语各不相同,包括患者参与、以患者为中心、患者赋权和患者参与度。尽管患者通常似乎对参与自身安全以及在医疗环境中合作持积极态度和意愿,但其意愿和实际行为差异很大。患者似乎不太可能参与需要质疑医疗专业人员的感知或实际权威的行为。患者与医疗专业人员合作以促使医疗专业人员遵守手卫生规定的意愿及后续行为,受到复杂的内部、外部和社会因素以及文化、行为和系统因素的影响。

目的

确定与患者与医疗专业人员合作以促使遵守手卫生规定的体验相关的最佳现有证据。

纳入标准参与者类型

本次综述纳入了定性(批判性或解释性)论文,这些论文涉及急性医院护理环境中的成年住院患者和医疗专业人员(医护人员)。成年人被定义为任何年龄在18岁及以上的人。需要注意的是,在此背景下,消费者即患者,反之亦然;因此,本报告通篇使用“患者”一词以保持一致性。

感兴趣的现象

本次综述纳入了调查患者与医疗专业人员在遵守手卫生规定方面的合作体验的研究。本综述从患者和医疗专业人员两个角度调查了合作现象。

研究类型

本次综述纳入了侧重于定性数据的研究,包括但不限于现象学、扎根理论、民族志、行动研究和女性主义研究等设计。由于识别出了定性研究,且经评估发现其质量足以纳入,因此本综述未寻求其他形式的证据,如文本和观点。

检索策略

检索策略旨在查找1990年至2015年5月期间已发表和未发表的研究。考虑纳入以英文发表的研究。

方法学质量

在使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所定性评估和综述工具(JBI-QARI)的标准化批判性评估工具将其纳入综述之前,由两名独立评审员对选定进行检索的定性论文进行方法学有效性评估。

数据提取

使用JBI-QARI的标准化数据提取工具从纳入综述的论文中提取定性数据。

数据综合

使用JBI-QARI汇总定性研究结果。

结果

经过系统检索和批判性评估过程,三项研究被纳入综述以进行数据提取和结果综合。综述过程产生了29项研究结果,这些结果被汇总为七个类别。这些类别产生了两个元综合结果。两个最终综合结果如下。综合结果1:组织结构有助于医疗专业人员与患者就遵守手卫生规定进行合作;然而,医疗专业人员和患者的文化、信仰和行为并未充分支持这种合作。综合结果2:患者的知识水平各不相同,出于对自身福祉、健康结果、治疗和/或康复的担忧,他们在遵守手卫生规定的合作与对医疗专业人员提供的护理关系可能产生的不利影响之间进行权衡。

结论

本次综述突出了患者与医疗专业人员合作以促使遵守手卫生规定的体验的复杂性。报告的体验表明,在医疗机构及医疗专业人员对促进遵守手卫生规定的合作的宣传和意愿与患者对该举措的实际接受、参与、合作、体验和实施之间可能存在差距。这种意图与行动之间的脱节似乎受到多种因素的影响,包括组织结构以及文化信仰和行为等驱动因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验