Ferreira Joaquim J, Lee Jee-Young, Ma Hyeo-Il, Jeon Beomseok, Poewe Werner, Antonini Angelo, Stocchi Fabrizio, Rodrigues Daniela M, Fonseca Miguel M, Castilla-Fernández Guillermo, Holenz Joerg, Rocha José-Francisco, Rascol Olivier
IMM - Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
CNS - Campus Neurológico, Torres Vedras, Portugal.
J Neurol. 2024 Oct;271(10):6729-6738. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12614-8. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
The wearing-off phenomenon is a key driver of medication change for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) treated with levodopa. Common first-line options include increasing the levodopa dose or adding a catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor, but there are no trials comparing the efficacy of these approaches. We evaluated the effectiveness of adjunct opicapone versus an additional 100 mg levodopa dose in PD patients with early wearing-off using pooled data from 2 randomized studies.
The ADOPTION study program included two similarly designed 4-week, open-label studies conducted in South Korea (NCT04821687) and Europe (NCT04990284). Patients with PD, treated with 3-4 daily doses of levodopa therapy and with signs of early wearing-off were randomized (1:1) to adjunct opicapone 50 mg or an additional dose of levodopa 100 mg. Patient-level data from the two studies were pooled.
The adjusted mean [SE] change from baseline to week 4 in absolute OFF time (key endpoint) was - 62.8 min [8.8] in the opicapone group and - 33.8 min [9.0] in the levodopa 100 mg group, the difference significantly favoring opicapone (- 29.0 [- 53.8, - 4.2] min, p = 0.02). Significant differences in the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III subscore (- 4.1 with opicapone vs - 2.5 with levodopa 100 mg), also favored opicapone (- 1.7 [- 3.3, - 0.04], p < 0.05). Dyskinesia was the most frequently reported adverse event (opicapone 7.2% vs. levodopa 100 mg 4.2%).
In these short-term trials, introducing adjunct opicapone was more effective at reducing OFF time than adding another 100 mg levodopa dose in PD patients with early signs of wearing-off.
剂末现象是接受左旋多巴治疗的帕金森病(PD)患者药物变更的关键驱动因素。常见的一线选择包括增加左旋多巴剂量或添加儿茶酚-O-甲基转移酶(COMT)抑制剂,但尚无比较这些方法疗效的试验。我们使用两项随机研究的汇总数据,评估了奥匹卡朋辅助治疗与额外增加100mg左旋多巴剂量对早期出现剂末现象的PD患者的有效性。
ADOPTION研究项目包括在韩国(NCT04821687)和欧洲(NCT04990284)进行的两项设计相似的为期4周的开放标签研究。接受每日3-4次左旋多巴治疗且有早期剂末现象迹象的PD患者被随机(1:1)分为接受50mg奥匹卡朋辅助治疗组或额外100mg左旋多巴剂量组。汇总了两项研究的患者层面数据。
从基线到第4周,奥匹卡朋组绝对“关”期(关键终点)的调整后平均[标准误]变化为-62.8分钟[8.8],100mg左旋多巴组为-33.8分钟[9.0],差异显著有利于奥匹卡朋(-29.0[-53.8,-4.2]分钟,p=0.02)。运动障碍协会统一帕金森病评定量表第三部分子评分的显著差异(奥匹卡朋组为-4.1,100mg左旋多巴组为-2.5)也有利于奥匹卡朋(-1.7[-3.3,-0.04],p<0.05)。异动症是最常报告的不良事件(奥匹卡朋组为7.2%,100mg左旋多巴组为4.2%)。
在这些短期试验中,对于有早期剂末现象迹象的PD患者,引入奥匹卡朋辅助治疗在减少“关”期时间方面比额外增加100mg左旋多巴剂量更有效。