Liu Dong, Zhao Jiaoshi, Lin Churong, Liu Budian, Li Jinwei, Zhang Yuxuan, Jin Ou, Gu Jieruo
Department of Rheumatology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Radiology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
BMC Rheumatol. 2024 Aug 21;8(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s41927-024-00397-4.
This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of identifying enthesitis along with other inflammatory lesions and structural lesions on the MRI of the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) by readers of varying experience and how training sessions and workshops could help improve the accuracy.
A total of 224 patients with clinical diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis who underwent SIJ MRI examinations were retrospectively included in this study. Three readers with 5 years, 3 years and 1 year of experience in musculoskeletal imaging were invited to review the SIJ MRI images independently, while the imaging reports of a senior radiologist (> 10 years' experience) were used as reference. After the first round of image review, a training session and a workshop on the imaging of SIJ in spondyloarthritis were held and the three readers were asked to review the images in the second round. We calculated the accuracy of identifying inflammatory and structural lesions of the three readers as well as the intra-reader agreement.
Enthesitis could be observed in 52.23% of the axial spondyloarthritis patients, while 81.58% of the patients with enthesitis were accompanied with bone marrow edema. All the three readers showed better accuracy at identifying structural lesions than inflammatory lesions. In the first round of image review, the three readers only correctly identified 15.07%, 2.94% and 0.74% of the enthesitis sites. After the training session and workshop, the accuracy rose to 61.03%, 39.34% and 20.22%. The intra-reader agreement of enthesitis calculated as Cohen's kappa was 0.23, 0.034 and 0.014, respectively.
Readers with less experience in musculoskeletal imaging showed lower accuracy of identifying inflammatory lesions, notably enthesitis. Training sessions and workshops could help improve the diagnostic accuracy of the junior readers.
本研究旨在调查不同经验的阅片者在骶髂关节(SIJ)MRI上识别附着点炎以及其他炎性病变和结构病变的准确性,以及培训课程和研讨会如何有助于提高准确性。
本研究回顾性纳入了224例临床诊断为轴性脊柱关节炎且接受了SIJ MRI检查的患者。邀请了三位分别具有5年、3年和1年肌肉骨骼成像经验的阅片者独立阅片SIJ MRI图像,同时将一位经验丰富的放射科医生(>10年经验)的影像报告作为参考。在第一轮图像阅片后,举办了关于脊柱关节炎中SIJ成像的培训课程和研讨会,并要求三位阅片者进行第二轮图像阅片。我们计算了三位阅片者识别炎性和结构病变的准确性以及阅片者内部的一致性。
52.23%的轴性脊柱关节炎患者可观察到附着点炎,而81.58%的附着点炎患者伴有骨髓水肿。三位阅片者在识别结构病变方面均比炎性病变表现出更高的准确性。在第一轮图像阅片中,三位阅片者仅分别正确识别了15.07%、2.94%和0.74%的附着点炎部位。经过培训课程和研讨会后,准确性分别提高到61.03%、39.34%和20.22%。以Cohen's kappa计算的阅片者内部附着点炎一致性分别为0.23、0.034和0.014。
在肌肉骨骼成像方面经验较少的阅片者在识别炎性病变(尤其是附着点炎)时准确性较低。培训课程和研讨会有助于提高初级阅片者的诊断准确性。