• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在表情符号使用的理解和审美偏好方面是否存在代际差异?来自微信的证据。

Is there an intergenerational discrepancy in the comprehension and aesthetic preference regarding emoji usage? Evidence from WeChat.

作者信息

Wu Donghang, Zhang Xinxiu, Zhang Xinjia

机构信息

School of Fine Arts, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.

School of Design and Art, Jingdezhen Ceramic University, Jingdezhen, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 11;15:1424728. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1424728. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1424728
PMID:39165767
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11333970/
Abstract

Emojis are widely used on social media, blogs, and instant messaging to express users' feelings. However, in everyday interactions, the same emoji often has different interpretations and aesthetic preferences among different age groups. This can lead to communication barriers and misunderstandings. Based on social identity theory, this study uses WeChat, a social platform popular in China, to analyze intergenerational differences in emoji understanding and preferences through a questionnaire survey. The results indicate: (1) There are significant intergenerational differences in the usage habits, interpretation, and aesthetic preferences of emojis. (2) Middle-aged and elderly tend to interpret goodbye emoji symbols as simple emotional expressions, such as "goodbye" or "see you later," while younger-age groups lean towards more complex emotions and social intentions, such as "speechlessness" and "end of friendship." (3) Younger-age groups use emojis frequently and with a wide variety, whereas middle-aged and elderly groups use emojis less frequently and with limited variety. Younger individuals' aesthetic preferences for emojis lean towards humor, conflict, and narrative, whereas middle-aged and elderly groups prefer emojis with bright colors and everyday greetings typical of their generation. Based on research findings, we believe that social identity theory provides a framework for understanding how individuals establish their identities through interactions with specific social groups. This study is beneficial for identifying the comprehension and aesthetic biases in emoji usage across generations, sheds light on the broader implications of social identity theory in digital communication contexts, and promotes friendly social interactions in real-time communication applications.

摘要

表情符号在社交媒体、博客和即时通讯中被广泛使用,以表达用户的感受。然而,在日常互动中,同一个表情符号在不同年龄组之间往往有不同的解释和审美偏好。这可能导致沟通障碍和误解。基于社会认同理论,本研究使用在中国流行的社交平台微信,通过问卷调查分析表情符号理解和偏好的代际差异。结果表明:(1)表情符号的使用习惯、解释和审美偏好在代际之间存在显著差异。(2)中年人和老年人倾向于将再见表情符号简单地解释为情感表达,如“再见”或“稍后见”,而年轻群体则倾向于更复杂的情感和社交意图,如“无语”和“友谊结束”。(3)年轻群体频繁且多样化地使用表情符号,而中年和老年群体使用表情符号的频率较低且种类有限。年轻人对表情符号的审美偏好倾向于幽默、冲突和叙事,而中年和老年群体则更喜欢颜色鲜艳且具有他们那一代人典型日常问候的表情符号。基于研究结果,我们认为社会认同理论为理解个体如何通过与特定社会群体的互动来确立自己的身份提供了一个框架。本研究有助于识别跨代表情符号使用中的理解和审美偏差,揭示社会认同理论在数字通信背景下的更广泛影响,并促进实时通信应用中的友好社交互动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c1/11333970/87886861411a/fpsyg-15-1424728-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c1/11333970/52ff78655ef8/fpsyg-15-1424728-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c1/11333970/87886861411a/fpsyg-15-1424728-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c1/11333970/52ff78655ef8/fpsyg-15-1424728-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c1/11333970/87886861411a/fpsyg-15-1424728-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Is there an intergenerational discrepancy in the comprehension and aesthetic preference regarding emoji usage? Evidence from WeChat.在表情符号使用的理解和审美偏好方面是否存在代际差异?来自微信的证据。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 11;15:1424728. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1424728. eCollection 2024.
2
Emoji use in China: popularity patterns and changes due to COVID-19.中国的表情符号使用情况:流行模式及因新冠疫情产生的变化。
Appl Intell (Dordr). 2022;52(14):16138-16148. doi: 10.1007/s10489-022-03195-y. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
3
Sender Gender Influences Emoji Interpretation in Text Messages.发送者性别会影响短信中表情符号的解读。
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 5;10:784. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00784. eCollection 2019.
4
Emoji use in social media posts: relationships with personality traits and word usage.社交媒体帖子中表情符号的使用:与个性特征和词汇使用的关系。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 5;15:1343022. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1343022. eCollection 2024.
5
Sentiment of Emojis.表情符号的情感
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 7;10(12):e0144296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144296. eCollection 2015.
6
A study on the embarrassment of senders who missend emojis with opposite meanings on social apps: taking WeChat as an example.一项关于社交应用上误发含义相反表情符号的发送者尴尬情况的研究:以微信为例。
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2020 Aug 24;33(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s41155-020-00159-4.
7
Individual differences in emoji comprehension: Gender, age, and culture.个体在表情符号理解上的差异:性别、年龄和文化。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 14;19(2):e0297379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297379. eCollection 2024.
8
The pragmatic functions of emojis in Arabic tweets.阿拉伯语推文中表情符号的语用功能。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 27;13:1059672. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1059672. eCollection 2022.
9
A strong wink between verbal and emoji-based irony: How the brain processes ironic emojis during language comprehension.言语和表情符号式反讽之间的强烈暗示:大脑在语言理解过程中如何处理反讽表情符号。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 15;13(8):e0201727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201727. eCollection 2018.
10
A study of dynamic emoji emotional responses based on rhythms and motion effects.一项基于节奏和动态效果的动态表情符号情感反应研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 12;14:1247595. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1247595. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Emoji as gesture in digital communication: Emoji improve comprehension of indirect speech.表情符号作为数字交流中的一种手势:表情符号有助于理解间接言语。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Jun;31(3):1335-1347. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02411-1. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
2
Mad or mad-mad: conveying subtle emotion with face emoji.疯狂还是抓狂:用表情符号传达微妙情感。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 28;14:1183299. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1183299. eCollection 2023.
3
The relationship between positive workplace gossip and job satisfaction: The mediating role of job insecurity and organizational identity.
积极的职场八卦与工作满意度之间的关系:工作不安全感和组织认同的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 28;13:989380. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.989380. eCollection 2022.
4
Age Differences in the Interpretation of Facial Emojis: Classification on the Arousal-Valence Space.面部表情符号解读中的年龄差异:在唤醒-效价空间上的分类
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 14;13:915550. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915550. eCollection 2022.
5
Respecting the Old and Loving the Young: Emoji-Based Sarcasm Interpretation Between Younger and Older Adults.尊老爱幼:年轻人与年长者之间基于表情符号的讽刺理解
Front Psychol. 2022 May 19;13:897153. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.897153. eCollection 2022.
6
Are Emoji Processed Like Words? An Eye-Tracking Study.表情符号是否像单词一样被处理?一项眼动追踪研究。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Feb;46(2):e13099. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13099.
7
What Did They Mean by That? Young Adults' Interpretations of 105 Common Emojis.他们那样说是什么意思?年轻人对105个常见表情符号的解读。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 31;12:655297. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655297. eCollection 2021.
8
Emoji as Affective Symbols: Affective Judgments of Emoji, Emoticons, and Human Faces Varying in Emotional Content.表情符号作为情感符号:对表情符号、表情图和情感内容各异的人脸的情感判断
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 20;12:645173. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.645173. eCollection 2021.
9
A study on the embarrassment of senders who missend emojis with opposite meanings on social apps: taking WeChat as an example.一项关于社交应用上误发含义相反表情符号的发送者尴尬情况的研究:以微信为例。
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2020 Aug 24;33(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s41155-020-00159-4.
10
Age-Related Differences in Emoji Evaluation.年龄相关的表情评价差异。
Exp Aging Res. 2020 Oct-Dec;46(5):416-432. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2020.1790087. Epub 2020 Jul 14.