Bokov Andrey E, Kalinina Svetlana Y, Khaltyrov Mingiyan I, Saifullin Alexandr P, Bulkin Anatoliy A
Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia.
Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia.
World J Orthop. 2024 Aug 18;15(8):734-743. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i8.734.
Indirect decompression is one of the potential benefits of anterior reconstruction in patients with spinal stenosis. On the other hand, the reported rate of revision surgery after indirect decompression highlights the necessity of working out prediction models for the radiographic results of indirect decompression with assessing their clinical relevance.
To assess factors that influence radiographic and clinical results of the indirect decompression in patients with stenosis of the lumbar spine.
This study is a single-center cross-sectional evaluation of 80 consecutive patients (17 males and 63 females) with lumbar spinal stenosis combined with the instability of the lumbar spinal segment. Patients underwent single level or bisegmental spinal instrumentation employing oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. Radiographic results of the indirect decompression were assessed using computerized tomography, while MacNab scale was used to assess clinical results.
After indirect decompression employing anterior reconstruction using OLIF, the statistically significant increase in the disc space height, vertebral canal square, right and left lateral canal depth were detected ( < 0.0001). The median () relative vertebral canal square increase came to = 24.5% with 25%-75% quartile border (16.3%; 33.3%) if indirect decompression was achieved by restoration of the segment height. In patients with the reduction of the upper vertebrae slip, the median of the relative increase in vertebral canal square accounted for 49.5% with 25%-75% quartile border (2.35; 99.75). Six out of 80 patients (7.5%) presented with unsatisfactory results because of residual nerve root compression. The critical values for lateral recess depth and vertebral canal square that were associated with indirect decompression failure were 3 mm and 80 mm respectively.
Indirect decompression employing anterior reconstruction is achieved by the increase in disc height along the posterior boarder and reduction of the slipped vertebrae in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Vertebral canal square below 80 mm and lateral recess depth less than 3 mm are associated with indirect decompression failures that require direct microsurgical decompression.
间接减压是脊柱狭窄患者前路重建的潜在益处之一。另一方面,间接减压后报道的翻修手术率凸显了制定间接减压影像学结果预测模型并评估其临床相关性的必要性。
评估影响腰椎管狭窄症患者间接减压影像学和临床结果的因素。
本研究是对80例连续的腰椎管狭窄合并腰椎节段性不稳患者(17例男性和63例女性)进行的单中心横断面评估。患者接受单节段或双节段脊柱内固定,采用斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)联合经皮椎弓根螺钉固定。使用计算机断层扫描评估间接减压的影像学结果,同时使用MacNab量表评估临床结果。
采用OLIF进行前路重建间接减压后,椎间盘高度、椎管面积、左右侧隐窝深度均有统计学意义的增加(<0.0001)。如果通过恢复节段高度实现间接减压,相对椎管面积增加的中位数()达到=24.5%,四分位数间距为25%-75%(16.3%;33.3%)。在上位椎体滑脱减轻的患者中,椎管面积相对增加的中位数为49.5%,四分位数间距为25%-75%(2.35;99.75)。80例患者中有6例(7.5%)因残留神经根受压而结果不满意。与间接减压失败相关的侧隐窝深度和椎管面积的临界值分别为3mm和80mm²。
对于退行性腰椎滑脱患者,通过增加椎间盘后缘高度和复位滑脱椎体实现前路重建间接减压。椎管面积小于80mm²和侧隐窝深度小于3mm与间接减压失败相关,需要直接显微手术减压。