• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜与开放手术治疗腕管综合征:糖尿病患者的术后并发症

Endoscopic Versus Open Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Postoperative Complications in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.

作者信息

Kishan Arman, Kubsad Sanjay, Haft Mark, Fox Henry M, Tuffaha Sami H, LaPorte Dawn M, Nguyen Duc M

机构信息

Division of Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024 Jun 12;6(4):577-582. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.04.015. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.04.015
PMID:39166198
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11331215/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) often face higher postoperative complication rates. Limited data exist regarding outcomes in T2DM patients undergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR). This study compares complication rates between endoscopic CTR (ECTR) and open CTR (OCTR) in patients with T2DM.

METHODS

The TriNetX database was used to perform a retrospective cohort study of 67,225 patients with T2DM who underwent ECTR (n = 17,792) or OCTR (n = 49,433). Demographic data, medical comorbidities, and complication rates were analyzed. A 1:1 propensity score match was performed to calculate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals of postoperative median nerve injury, 6-week wound dehiscence, and 6-week wound infection.

RESULTS

After matching, a significantly greater number of ECTR patients had liver disease ( = <.001) and a body mass index > 40 ( = .001) compared to the OCTR group. These patients also had a lower incidence of fluid and electrolyte disorders ( = .003). Patients with T2DM who underwent ECTR had a significantly lower relative risk of 6-week wound infection, 6-week wound dehiscence, and median nerve injury (all < .001) compared to patients who underwent OCTR.

CONCLUSIONS

In our analysis of T2DM patients undergoing CTR, ECTR yielded significantly lower rates of wound infection, wound dehiscence, and nerve injury within 6-weeks post-surgery, reducing the risk by 43%, 52%, and 58%, respectively. These findings suggest that ECTR may result in a lower complication rate in this patient population.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

摘要

目的

2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者术后并发症发生率通常较高。关于接受腕管松解术(CTR)的T2DM患者的预后数据有限。本研究比较了T2DM患者接受内镜下CTR(ECTR)和开放式CTR(OCTR)后的并发症发生率。

方法

使用TriNetX数据库对67225例接受ECTR(n = 17792)或OCTR(n = 49433)的T2DM患者进行回顾性队列研究。分析人口统计学数据、合并症和并发症发生率。进行1:1倾向评分匹配,以计算术后正中神经损伤、6周伤口裂开和6周伤口感染的风险比及95%置信区间。

结果

匹配后,与OCTR组相比,ECTR患者中患有肝病(P = <.001)和体重指数>40(P = .001)的人数明显更多。这些患者的液体和电解质紊乱发生率也较低(P = .003)。与接受OCTR的患者相比,接受ECTR的T2DM患者6周伤口感染、6周伤口裂开和正中神经损伤的相对风险显著更低(均P < .001)。

结论

在我们对接受CTR的T2DM患者的分析中,ECTR在术后6周内产生的伤口感染、伤口裂开和神经损伤发生率显著更低,风险分别降低了43%、52%和58%。这些发现表明,ECTR可能使该患者群体的并发症发生率更低。

研究类型/证据水平:III级

相似文献

1
Endoscopic Versus Open Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Postoperative Complications in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.内镜与开放手术治疗腕管综合征:糖尿病患者的术后并发症
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024 Jun 12;6(4):577-582. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.04.015. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome.腕管综合征的内镜下松解术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 31;2014(1):CD008265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008265.pub2.
3
Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release: A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Complications.内镜下与开放性腕管松解术:结局与并发症的系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Jul 20;16(7):e64991. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64991. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Effects of Hand Fellowship Training on Rates of Endoscopic and Open Carpal Tunnel Release.手部专科培训对内镜下和开放性腕管松解术发生率的影响。
J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Apr;41(4):e53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.12.027. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
5
Multistate Comparison of Cost, Trends, and Complications in Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release.多州比较开放性与内窥镜下腕管松解术的成本、趋势和并发症。
Hand (N Y). 2021 Jan;16(1):25-31. doi: 10.1177/1558944719837020. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
6
Trends and Complications in Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release in Private Payer and Medicare Patient Populations.私立医保和联邦医疗保险患者群体中开放性与内镜下腕管松解术的趋势及并发症
Hand (N Y). 2019 Jul;14(4):455-461. doi: 10.1177/1558944717751196. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
7
Revision Carpal Tunnel Release Following Endoscopic Compared With Open Decompression.内镜下与开放性减压后腕管松解术的翻修。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2352660. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.52660.
8
Improved Surgical Outcomes With Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release in Patients With Severe Median Neuropathy.内镜下腕管松解术治疗重度正中神经病变患者可改善手术效果
Hand (N Y). 2017 May;12(3):252-257. doi: 10.1177/1558944716661995. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
9
A Comparison of Amyloid Deposition in Endoscopic and Open Carpal Tunnel Release.内镜与开放腕管松解术中淀粉样沉积的比较。
J Hand Surg Am. 2024 Apr;49(4):301-309. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.01.002. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
10
Outcomes Following Endoscopic versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release-A Matched Study.内镜下与开放性腕管松解术的疗效对比——一项匹配研究
World Neurosurg. 2023 Mar;171:e162-e171. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.11.115. Epub 2022 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Reoperation Rates and Short-Term Complications Following Endoscopic vs. Open Carpal Tunnel Release: A Longitudinal Analysis.内镜下与开放性腕管松解术后的再次手术率及短期并发症:一项纵向分析。
Hand (N Y). 2025 May 3:15589447251333817. doi: 10.1177/15589447251333817.

本文引用的文献

1
Wound Healing Complications in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Carpal Tunnel and Trigger Finger Releases: A Retrospective Cohort Study.接受腕管松解术和扳机指松解术的糖尿病患者的伤口愈合并发症:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Dec;46(12):1057-1063. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
2
Serious postoperative complications and reoperation after carpal tunnel decompression surgery in England: a nationwide cohort analysis.英国腕管减压手术后的严重术后并发症及再次手术:一项全国性队列分析。
Lancet Rheumatol. 2020 Sep 30;3(1):e49-e57. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30238-1. eCollection 2021 Jan.
3
The Utility of Preoperative HbA1c as a Standardized Protocol in Elective Carpal Tunnel Release: A Retrospective Review of Clinical Outcomes.术前 HbA1c 作为腕管松解术的标准化方案的效用:临床结局的回顾性研究。
Hand (N Y). 2022 Mar;17(2):224-230. doi: 10.1177/1558944720919181. Epub 2020 May 23.
4
Incidence and operations of median, ulnar and radial entrapment neuropathies in Finland: a nationwide register study.芬兰正中神经、尺神经和桡神经卡压性神经病的发病率及手术情况:一项全国性登记研究
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2020 Mar;45(3):226-230. doi: 10.1177/1753193419886741. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
5
Economic benefit of carpal tunnel release in the Medicare patient population.医疗保险患者人群中行腕管松解术的经济效益。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 May;44(5):E16. doi: 10.3171/2018.1.FOCUS17802.
6
The Association of Perioperative Glycemic Control With Postoperative Surgical Site Infection Following Open Carpal Tunnel Release in Patients With Diabetes.糖尿病患者开放性腕管松解术后围手术期血糖控制与术后手术部位感染的相关性
Hand (N Y). 2019 May;14(3):324-328. doi: 10.1177/1558944717743594. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
7
Patient-Related Risk Factors for Infection Following Open Carpal Tunnel Release: An Analysis of Over 450,000 Medicare Patients.开放性腕管松解术后感染的患者相关危险因素:对超过45万名医疗保险患者的分析
J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Mar;43(3):214-219. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.09.017. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
8
The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline on: Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.美国矫形外科医师学会关于腕管综合征管理的循证临床实践指南。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Oct 19;98(20):1750-1754. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00719.
9
Endoscopic and Open Release Similarly Safe for the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.内镜下和开放性松解术治疗腕管综合征同样安全。一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 16;10(12):e0143683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143683. eCollection 2015.
10
Pathophysiology of carpal tunnel syndrome.腕管综合征的病理生理学
Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2015 Jan;20(1):4-9.