Suppr超能文献

使用新型手术器械经皮手术治疗扳机指:新鲜尸体实验研究

Percutaneous Surgery for Trigger Finger Treatment Using a Novel Surgical Device: An Experimental Study on Fresh Cadavers.

作者信息

de Carvalho Willker Galvão, Raduan Neto Jorge, Okamura Aldo, Wolquind Fernando Szuchman, Pires Fernando Araújo, Belloti João Carlos

机构信息

Disciplina de Cirurgia da mão, Hospital Alvorada Moema, São Paulo, Brazil.

UNIFESP - Univerdidade Federal de São Paulo - Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024 May 15;6(4):494-499. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.03.002. eCollection 2024 Jul.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Trigger finger, a stenosing tenosynovitis of the flexor tendon at the A1 pulley, can cause pain and impair daily activities. Despite common surgical interventions, postsurgical complications are frequent, prompting the search for less invasive techniques.

METHODS

An experimental study was conducted on fresh cadavers to compare three techniques: the first using a PulleyCut without ultrasound guidance, the second using a PulleyCut with ultrasound guidance, and the third using a percutaneous needle technique. The complete release of the A1 pulley, integrity of the A2 pulley, flexor tendons, and neurovascular bundles were assessed.

RESULTS

The new device group and the ultrasound-guided group demonstrated 100% complete release of the A1 pulley, whereas the needle group achieved only 38% success. There were no A2 pulley injuries in any group. Flexor tendons were injured in 7% of cases in the new device group and 77% in the needle group. A neurovascular injury occurred in the needle group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the percutaneous needle technique, the new device proved safe and effective for A1 pulley release, minimizing damage to flexor tendons and neurovascular structures. Ultrasound did not provide significant advantages, suggesting that the new device can be confidently used without ultrasound assistance. The PulleyCut represents a promising percutaneous technique for trigger finger treatment, demonstrating superiority over the needle technique in terms of efficacy and safety. These results encourage future clinical investigations to validate its practical application.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IIc.

摘要

目的

扳机指是指屈肌腱在A1滑车处发生狭窄性腱鞘炎,可引起疼痛并影响日常活动。尽管有常见的手术干预方法,但术后并发症仍很常见,这促使人们寻找侵入性较小的技术。

方法

在新鲜尸体上进行了一项实验研究,以比较三种技术:第一种是在无超声引导下使用PulleyCut,第二种是在超声引导下使用PulleyCut,第三种是使用经皮穿刺针技术。评估A1滑车的完全松解情况、A2滑车、屈肌腱和神经血管束的完整性。

结果

新器械组和超声引导组A1滑车完全松解率均为100%,而穿刺针组成功率仅为38%。所有组均未出现A2滑车损伤。新器械组7%的病例出现屈肌腱损伤,穿刺针组为77%。穿刺针组发生了神经血管损伤。

结论

与经皮穿刺针技术相比,新器械在松解A1滑车方面安全有效,可将对屈肌腱和神经血管结构的损伤降至最低。超声未显示出明显优势,这表明新器械在无超声辅助的情况下也可放心使用。PulleyCut是一种很有前景的扳机指经皮治疗技术,在疗效和安全性方面优于穿刺针技术。这些结果鼓励未来进行临床研究以验证其实际应用。

研究类型/证据水平:治疗性IIc级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc05/11331159/a0b3060c465a/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验