Epicurus-Reviews, MetaAnalyses.com, Bilzen, Belgium.
SciPinion, Bozeman, Montana, USA.
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2024 Sep 10;37(3):300-310. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02387. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
1,3-Butadiene (BD) exposure's link to leukemia is under regulatory scrutiny. The assessment methods for BD exposure risks have evolved from early animal and limited human studies to advanced exposure-response modelling with comprehensive quantitative data. The objec- tive of this study is to explore the nuances of exposure-response modelling, investigating how various statistical methods have influenced the quan- tification of exposure-response relationships.
Although this study was not conducted as a formal systematic review, a search was performed in Medline/Pubmed to identify all human studies on leukemia risk assessment for BD exposure. This search included articles written in English. The electronic search spanned from inception of records until July 23, 2023, using the search term: "butadiene AND (leukaemia OR leukemia OR myeloid OR lymphoid)" and was restricted to human species. Focusing on the synthetic styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) industry cohort study conducted by the University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA, this review evaluates various statistical models and factors influenc- ing exposure-response modelling.
Peak exposures to BD may be more influential in the dose-response relationship than cumulative or long-term exposure. The authors recommend utilizing β-coefficients derived from the latest SBR study update, employing Cox proportional hazard modelling, non-lagged and non-transformed cumulative BD exposure, and adjusting for age and peak BD exposure. The study reveals that statistical model selection has a limited impact on the calculated dose-response effects. The significant variation in estimated cancer mortality values arises from additional assumptions needed for metrics like the excess leukemia risk or the occupational BD effective concentration.
In con- clusion, this study provides insights into exposure-response modelling for BD exposure and leukemia mortality, highlighting the importance of peak exposures. The recommended statistical approach offers a reliable basis for regulatory risk assessment and public health population metrics. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2024;37(3):300-10.
1,3-丁二烯(BD)暴露与白血病之间的关系受到监管审查。BD 暴露风险的评估方法已经从早期的动物和有限的人体研究发展到使用全面定量数据的先进暴露-反应建模。本研究的目的是探讨暴露-反应建模的细微差别,研究各种统计方法如何影响暴露-反应关系的量化。
尽管本研究不作为正式的系统评价进行,但在 Medline/Pubmed 中进行了搜索,以确定所有关于 BD 暴露致白血病风险评估的人类研究。该搜索包括用英文撰写的文章。电子搜索从记录开始到 2023 年 7 月 23 日进行,使用的搜索词是:“butadiene AND (leukaemia OR leukemia OR myeloid OR lymphoid)”,并限制在人类物种。本综述重点关注美国阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校进行的合成苯乙烯-丁二烯橡胶(SBR)行业队列研究,评估了各种统计模型和影响暴露-反应建模的因素。
BD 的峰值暴露可能比累积或长期暴露对剂量反应关系更有影响。作者建议利用最新 SBR 研究更新中得出的β系数,使用 Cox 比例风险模型,非滞后和非转换的累积 BD 暴露,并调整年龄和峰值 BD 暴露。研究表明,统计模型选择对计算的剂量-反应效应的影响有限。估计的癌症死亡率的显著差异源于超额白血病风险或职业 BD 有效浓度等指标所需的额外假设。
总之,本研究提供了有关 BD 暴露与白血病死亡率的暴露-反应建模的见解,强调了峰值暴露的重要性。建议的统计方法为监管风险评估和公共卫生人群指标提供了可靠的基础。国际职业医学与环境卫生杂志。2024;37(3):300-10。