Suppr超能文献

颈椎支具并不能改善后路颈椎融合术后的疼痛:一项随机对照试验。

Cervical orthosis does not improve postoperative pain following posterior cervical fusion: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Combined Orthopaedic and Neurosurgical Spine Program, London, ON, Canada.

Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2024 Oct;33(10):4002-4011. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08456-7. Epub 2024 Aug 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether postoperative neck pain in the first 4 weeks following multi-level posterior cervical fusion (PCF) with orthosis is equivalent to multi-level PCF without orthosis.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to postoperative orthosis (CO) for 6 weeks or no orthosis (NO). Randomization was stratified by indication (traumatic vs. degenerative), and preoperative opioid use. A model of longitudinal regression for repeated measures was used. The two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to test equivalence. If the CI lay between the pre-determined margin of equivalence (-2.0 to + 2.0 pain score) the two groups were considered equivalent. A multiple imputation procedure was used to replace missing data.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were enrolled in each group. At baseline, the CO group had more neck pain (5.3 vs. 3.2, p = 0.013). The Four week post-operative neck pain intensity score was 4.6 ± 0.3 for the CO group vs. 4.9 ± 0.3 for the NO group. The 95% confidence interval (-1.2 to 0.6) was within the pre-determined equivalence margin. Neck Disability Index, quality-of-life scores, and arm pain were similar. Eleven patients in the CO group and 12 patients in the NO group had an adverse event. The CO group had reduced range of motion at 6 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Pain scores over the first 4 weeks after surgery were equivalent for patients undergoing multi-level PCF treated with or without a cervical orthosis. Our findings do not support the routine use of a postoperative cervical orthosis for postoperative pain control. Clinical Trials Registration Number NCT04308122, April 22, 2020.

摘要

目的

确定多节段颈椎后路融合术后 4 周内佩戴支具与不佩戴支具有无差异。

方法

患者按 1:1 比例随机分为术后佩戴支具 6 周(CO 组)和不佩戴支具(NO 组)。随机化分层因素为适应证(创伤性与退行性)和术前是否使用阿片类药物。采用重复测量的纵向回归模型。使用双侧 95%置信区间(CI)来检验等效性。如果 CI 落在预定的等效边界(-2.0 至+2.0 疼痛评分)内,则认为两组等效。采用多重插补程序替换缺失数据。

结果

每组纳入 31 例患者。基线时,CO 组颈部疼痛更严重(5.3 分比 3.2 分,p=0.013)。CO 组术后第 4 周的颈部疼痛强度评分为 4.6±0.3,NO 组为 4.9±0.3。95%CI(-1.2 至 0.6)在预定的等效边界内。颈部残疾指数、生活质量评分和手臂疼痛相似。CO 组 11 例和 NO 组 12 例患者发生不良事件。CO 组在术后 6 周时的活动范围减少。

结论

多节段颈椎后路融合术后 4 周内,佩戴或不佩戴颈椎支具的患者疼痛评分相当。我们的研究结果不支持常规使用术后颈椎支具来控制术后疼痛。临床试验注册号 NCT04308122,2020 年 4 月 22 日。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验