Suppr超能文献

内踝骨折固定中,位置螺钉是否优于拉力螺钉?一项随机对照试验。

Are positional screws superior to lag screws in fixation of medial malleolar fractures? A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Dec;34(8):3897-3902. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04066-7. Epub 2024 Aug 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

There is no consensus about the best fixation method for medial malleolar fractures. This study was conducted to compare the clinical and radiological results of positional (fully threaded) screws and lag (partially threaded) screws when used to fix medial malleolar fractures.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized clinical trial included 68 patients with closed isolated medial malleolar fractures. Each study arm included 34 patients who were randomly treated with either fully threaded screws (FT group) or partially threaded screws (PT group). Patients were evaluated radiologically for union and clinically using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle hindfoot score.

RESULTS

After a 12-month follow-up, the mean AOFAS ankle hindfoot score was 92.1 ± 3.5 in the FT group and 91.8 ± 5.4 in the PT group. Union was achieved in the FT group after a mean of 6.2 ± 1.3 weeks and after a mean of 6.5 ± 1.5 weeks in the PT group.

CONCLUSION

Both fully threaded and partially threaded screws yielded good comparable clinical and radiological outcomes when used to fix isolated medial malleolar fractures.

摘要

目的

对于内踝骨折的最佳固定方法尚无共识。本研究旨在比较使用位置(全螺纹)螺钉和拉力(部分螺纹)螺钉固定内踝骨折的临床和影像学结果。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、随机临床试验,纳入了 68 例闭合性单纯内踝骨折患者。每个研究组包括 34 例患者,随机接受全螺纹螺钉(FT 组)或部分螺纹螺钉(PT 组)治疗。患者接受影像学(愈合情况)和临床(美国矫形足踝协会 [AOFAS] 踝后足评分)评估。

结果

随访 12 个月后,FT 组的平均 AOFAS 踝后足评分为 92.1±3.5,PT 组为 91.8±5.4。FT 组的平均愈合时间为 6.2±1.3 周,PT 组为 6.5±1.5 周。

结论

使用全螺纹和部分螺纹螺钉固定单纯内踝骨折均可获得良好的临床和影像学结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验