Suppr超能文献

部分螺纹与全螺纹4毫米松质骨螺钉在内踝骨折固定中的比较

Comparison of Partially Threaded and Fully Threaded 4mm Cancellous Screws in Fixation of Medial Malleolar Fractures.

作者信息

Sayyed-Hosseinian Sayyed-Hadi, Bagheri Farshid, Ebrahimzadeh Mohammad-Hosien, Moradi Ali, Golshan Sogol

机构信息

Orthopedic Research Center, Shahid Kamyab Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Orthopedic Research Center Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2020 Nov;8(6):710-715. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2020.46112.2263.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several devices have been described for fixation of displaced medial malleolar fractures. Fully threaded cancellous screws engaging the bone may provide advantages compared to partially threaded screws. This study was designed to compare the clinical results of fully and partially threaded 4 millimeter cancellous screws in fixation of medial malleolar fractures.

METHODS

In a randomized clinical trial study 44 patients with displaced closed medial malleolar fractures were randomly divided into two groups. Two fully threaded four millimeter cancellous screws were used for fracture stabilization (FT group) in the first group, while, the second group was operated by use of two partially threaded four millimeter cancellous screws (PT group). The clinical outcomes and complications were compared in two groups at one year follow up.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients in FT group and 21 in PT group were present at final follow up. Nonunion was not developed in either group but two cases (9%) of delayed union occurred in PT group. The rate of postoperative infection and symptomatic hardware were not statistically different. Functional assessment using AOFAS, MOXFQ and VAS scores showed no significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Both fully and partially threaded 4 mm cancellous screws can be considered as acceptable devices for the fixation of medial malleolar fractures with good and comparable clinical results.

摘要

背景

已有多种用于固定移位性内踝骨折的器械。与部分螺纹螺钉相比,全螺纹的松质骨螺钉固定骨骼可能具有优势。本研究旨在比较全螺纹和部分螺纹的4毫米松质骨螺钉固定内踝骨折的临床效果。

方法

在一项随机临床试验研究中,44例移位性闭合性内踝骨折患者被随机分为两组。第一组使用两枚全螺纹4毫米松质骨螺钉进行骨折固定(FT组),而第二组则使用两枚部分螺纹4毫米松质骨螺钉进行手术(PT组)。在一年随访时比较两组的临床结果和并发症。

结果

最终随访时,FT组有19例患者,PT组有21例患者。两组均未发生骨不连,但PT组有2例(9%)发生延迟愈合。术后感染率和内固定物相关症状在统计学上无差异。使用AOFAS、MOXFQ和VAS评分进行的功能评估显示两组之间无显著差异。

结论

全螺纹和部分螺纹的4毫米松质骨螺钉均可被视为固定内踝骨折的可接受器械,临床效果良好且相当。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验