Mastandrea Paolo, Mengozzi Silvia, Bernardini Sergio
Department of Clinical Pathology, 90384 Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale e di Alta Specialità San Giuseppe Moscati , Salerno, Italy.
U.O. Patologia Clinica, AUSL della Romagna, Laboratorio Unico, Cesena, Forli'-Cesena, Italy.
Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 Aug 20;12(1):1-16. doi: 10.1515/dx-2024-0078. eCollection 2025 Feb 1.
Neurotrauma is the leading cause of death in individuals <45 years old. Many of the published articles on UCHL1 and GFAP lack rigorous methods and reporting.
Due to the high heterogeneity between studies, we evaluated blood GFAP and UCHL1 levels in the same subjects. We determined the biomarker congruence among areas under the ROC curves (AUCs), sensitivities, specificities, and laboratory values in ng/L to avoid spurious results. The definitive meta-analysis included 1,880 subjects in eight studies. The items with the highest risk of bias were as follows: cut-off not prespecified and case-control design not avoided. The AUC of GFAP was greater than the AUC of UCHL1, with a lower prediction interval (PI) limit of 50.1 % for GFAP and 37.3 % for UCHL1, and a significantly greater percentage of GFAP Sp. The PI of laboratory results for GFAP and UCHL1 were 0.517-7,518 ng/L (diseased), 1.2-255 ng/L (nondiseased), and 3-4,180 vs. 3.2-1,297 ng/L, respectively.
Only the GFAP positive cut-off (255 ng/L) appears to be reliable. The negative COs appear unreliable.
GFAP needs better standardization. However, the AUCs of the phospho-Tau and phospho-Tau/Tau proteins resulted not significantly lower than AUC of GFAP, but this result needs further verifications.
神经创伤是45岁以下人群死亡的主要原因。许多已发表的关于UCHL1和GFAP的文章缺乏严谨的方法和报告。
由于研究之间存在高度异质性,我们在同一受试者中评估了血液GFAP和UCHL1水平。我们确定了ROC曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性、特异性以及以ng/L为单位的实验室值之间的生物标志物一致性,以避免虚假结果。最终的荟萃分析纳入了八项研究中的1880名受试者。偏倚风险最高的项目如下:未预先设定临界值以及未避免病例对照设计。GFAP的AUC大于UCHL1的AUC,GFAP的预测区间(PI)下限较低,为50.1%,UCHL1为37.3%,且GFAP的特异性百分比显著更高。GFAP和UCHL1实验室结果的PI分别为0.517 - 7518 ng/L(患病)、1.2 - 255 ng/L(未患病)以及3 - 4180与3.2 - 1297 ng/L。
只有GFAP阳性临界值(255 ng/L)似乎是可靠的。阴性临界值似乎不可靠。
GFAP需要更好的标准化。然而,磷酸化Tau蛋白和磷酸化Tau蛋白/Tau蛋白的AUC结果并不显著低于GFAP的AUC,但这一结果需要进一步验证。