Suppr超能文献

优化基于学校的通用“我们的未来”心理健康项目,使其具备创伤知情、肯定性别与性取向多样性并遵循相称普遍主义:混合方法参与式设计过程。

Refining the Universal, School-Based OurFutures Mental Health Program to Be Trauma Informed, Gender and Sexuality Diversity Affirmative, and Adherent to Proportionate Universalism: Mixed Methods Participatory Design Process.

作者信息

Grummitt Lucinda, Bailey Sasha, Kelly Erin V, Birrell Louise, Gardner Lauren A, Halladay Jillian, Chapman Cath, Andrews Jack L, Champion Katrina E, Hunter Emily, Egan Lyra, Conroy Chloe, Tiko Raaya, Nguyen An, Teesson Maree, Newton Nicola C, Barrett Emma L

机构信息

The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

School of Nursing, McMaster University, Ontario, ON, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2024 Aug 21;7:e54637. doi: 10.2196/54637.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mental disorders are the leading cause of disease burden among youth. Effective prevention of mental disorders during adolescence is a critical public health strategy to reduce both individual and societal harms. Schools are an important setting for prevention; however, existing universal school-based mental health interventions have shown null, and occasionally iatrogenic, effects in preventing symptoms of common disorders, such as depression and anxiety.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to report the adaptation process of an established, universal, school-based prevention program for depression and anxiety, OurFutures Mental Health. Using a 4-stage process; triangulating quantitative, qualitative, and evidence syntheses; and centering the voices of young people, the revised program is trauma-informed; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, nonbinary, queer, questioning, and otherwise gender and sexuality diverse (LGBTQA+) affirmative; relevant to contemporary youth; and designed to tailor intervention dosage to those who need it most (proportionate universalism).

METHODS

Program adaptation occurred from April 2022 to July 2023 and involved 4 stages. Stage 1 comprised mixed methods analysis of student evaluation data (n=762; mean age 13.5, SD 0.62 y), collected immediately after delivering the OurFutures Mental Health program in a previous trial. Stage 2 consisted of 3 focus groups with high school students (n=39); regular meetings with a purpose-built, 8-member LGBTQA+ youth advisory committee; and 2 individual semistructured, in-depth interviews with LGBTQA+ young people via Zoom (Zoom Video Communications) or WhatsApp (Meta) text message. Stage 3 involved a clinical psychologist providing an in-depth review of all program materials with the view of enhancing readability, improving utility, and normalizing emotions while retaining key cognitive behavioral therapy elements. Finally, stage 4 involved fortnightly consultations among researchers and clinicians on the intervention adaptation, drawing on the latest evidence from existing literature in school-based prevention interventions, trauma-informed practice, and adolescent mental health.

RESULTS

Drawing on feedback from youth, clinical psychologists, and expert youth mental health researchers, sourced from stages 1 to 4, a series of adaptations were made to the storylines, characters, and delivery of therapeutic content contained in the weekly manualized program content, classroom activities, and weekly student and teacher lesson summaries.

CONCLUSIONS

The updated OurFutures Mental Health program is a trauma-informed, LBGTQA+ affirmative program aligned with the principles of proportionate universalism. The program adaptation responds to recent mixed findings on universal school-based mental health prevention programs, which include null, small beneficial, and small iatrogenic effects. The efficacy of the refined OurFutures Mental Health program is currently being tested through a cluster randomized controlled trial with up to 1400 students in 14 schools across Australia. It is hoped that the refined program will advance the current stalemate in universal school-based prevention of common mental disorders and ultimately improve the mental health and well-being of young people in schools.

摘要

背景

精神障碍是青少年疾病负担的主要原因。在青春期有效预防精神障碍是一项关键的公共卫生战略,可减少对个人和社会的危害。学校是预防的重要场所;然而,现有的基于学校的普遍心理健康干预措施在预防常见疾病(如抑郁症和焦虑症)症状方面显示出无效,甚至偶尔产生医源性影响。

目的

本研究旨在报告一项既定的、基于学校的抑郁症和焦虑症普遍预防计划“OurFutures Mental Health”的改编过程。通过一个4阶段的过程;对定量、定性和证据综合进行三角验证;并以年轻人的声音为中心,修订后的计划考虑到了创伤因素;对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、非二元性别、酷儿、疑问以及其他性别和性取向多元(LGBTQA+)群体持肯定态度;与当代青少年相关;并旨在为最需要的人量身定制干预剂量(相称普遍主义)。

方法

计划改编于2022年4月至2023年7月进行,包括4个阶段。第1阶段包括对学生评估数据(n = 762;平均年龄13.5岁,标准差0.62岁)进行混合方法分析,这些数据是在之前的一项试验中实施“OurFutures Mental Health”计划后立即收集的。第2阶段包括与高中生进行3次焦点小组讨论(n = 39);与一个专门设立的、由8名LGBTQA+青年组成的咨询委员会定期开会;以及通过Zoom(Zoom视频通讯)或WhatsApp(Meta)短信对LGBTQA+年轻人进行2次个人半结构化深度访谈。第3阶段,一名临床心理学家对所有计划材料进行深入审查,以提高可读性、实用性并使情绪正常化,同时保留关键的认知行为疗法元素。最后,第4阶段,研究人员和临床医生每两周就干预措施的改编进行一次咨询,借鉴学校预防干预、创伤知情实践和青少年心理健康方面现有文献的最新证据。

结果

根据从第1阶段到第4阶段收集的青少年、临床心理学家和青少年心理健康专家研究人员的反馈,对每周手册化计划内容、课堂活动以及每周学生和教师课程总结中包含的故事情节、角色和治疗内容的呈现方式进行了一系列改编。

结论

更新后的“OurFutures Mental Health”计划是一个考虑到创伤因素、对LGBTQA+群体持肯定态度的计划,符合相称普遍主义原则。该计划改编回应了近期关于基于学校的普遍心理健康预防计划的复杂研究结果,这些结果包括无效、微小益处和微小医源性影响。经过改进的“OurFutures Mental Health”计划的疗效目前正在通过一项整群随机对照试验进行测试,该试验涉及澳大利亚14所学校的多达1400名学生。希望经过改进的计划能够打破目前基于学校的常见精神障碍普遍预防的僵局,并最终改善学校中青少年的心理健康和幸福感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cd4/11375394/88d8c91e517d/pediatrics_v7i1e54637_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验