WeARE, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis, USA.
Eval Program Plann. 2024 Dec;107:102477. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102477. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
This paper examines graduate research assistants' informal applied learning experiences on the evaluation team at a university-based agricultural safety and health research center. The case study aims to identify the specific learning outcomes derived from the experience, as described by students, and the factors that facilitated them. The research team used a semi-structured focus group tool, and the focus group participants conducted their own analysis and interpretation of the data. An inductive qualitative analysis revealed that students had new perspectives on evaluation, greater evaluation knowledge, and comfort using evaluative tools. Students expressed that key factors like trust, respect, and reflective practice effectively fostered learning. These data were corroborated using deductive analysis using Fink's Taxonomy of Significant Learning. Ultimately, the study supports the value of informal applied learning experiences for students, particularly in the field of evaluation, and describes a model of support to facilitate learning in various contexts.
本文考察了研究生研究助理在一所大学农业安全与健康研究中心评估团队中的非正式应用学习经验。该案例研究旨在确定学生所描述的、从该经验中获得的具体学习成果,以及促进这些学习成果的因素。研究团队使用了半结构化的焦点小组工具,焦点小组参与者对数据进行了自己的分析和解释。归纳定性分析显示,学生对评估有了新的视角,评价知识有所增加,并且使用评估工具更加自如。学生们表示,信任、尊重和反思性实践等关键因素有效地促进了学习。这些数据通过使用芬克的重要学习分类法进行演绎分析得到了证实。最终,该研究支持了学生非正式应用学习经验的价值,特别是在评估领域,并描述了一种支持模式,以促进各种背景下的学习。