Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
ESMO Open. 2024 Sep;9(9):103660. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103660. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
The role of adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to chemotherapy in tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-resistant, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unknown. We carried out a meta-analysis to comprehensively assess the role of chemoimmunotherapy combinations, with and without vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition, in TKI-resistant, EGFR-mutant NSCLC.
We systemically searched PubMed/MEDLINE and the proceedings of key annual meetings between 2018 and 2024 to identify randomized studies that evaluated chemoimmunotherapy combinations and included patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Six randomized, phase III trials (CheckMate-722, KEYNOTE-789, ORIENT-31, IMpower150, IMpower151, and ATTLAS) were included in the meta-analysis. To compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes, we extracted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for PFS and OS for EGFR-mutant subgroups from each study. We used the fixed effects model with inverse variance weighting to estimate the overall effect sizes for PFS and OS for chemoimmunotherapy combinations (with and without VEGF inhibitors) versus control arms.
A total of 1772 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC were included. Adding programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-(L)1] inhibitors to chemotherapy significantly improved PFS (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67-0.88, P = 0.0002). This effect was greater when both PD-(L)1 and VEGF inhibition were utilized (PFS: HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.52-0.73, P < 0.0001). The pooled OS HR was 0.86 (95% CI 0.75-1.00, P = 0.0429) with the chemotherapy + PD-(L)1 combinations and 0.98 (95% CI 0.79-1.22, P = 0.8463) with dual PD-(L)1/VEGF inhibition.
Despite modest improvements in PFS, most pronounced when both PD-(L)1 and VEGF inhibitors are added to chemotherapy, neither strategy led to clinically meaningful improvements in OS. Our results do not support the broad use of chemoimmunotherapy combinations in TKI-resistant, EGFR-mutant lung cancer. Novel immunotherapy approaches are urgently needed for oncogene-driven NSCLC.
在酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)耐药的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中,加入免疫检查点抑制剂联合化疗的作用仍不清楚。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以全面评估化疗免疫联合治疗方案(联合或不联合血管内皮生长因子[VEGF]抑制)在 TKI 耐药、EGFR 突变 NSCLC 中的作用。
我们系统地检索了 2018 年至 2024 年期间 PubMed/MEDLINE 和主要年度会议的记录,以确定评估化疗免疫联合治疗方案并纳入 EGFR 突变 NSCLC 患者的随机研究。纳入了 6 项随机、III 期试验(CheckMate-722、KEYNOTE-789、ORIENT-31、IMpower150、IMpower151 和 ATTLAS)进行荟萃分析。为了比较无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)结局,我们从每项研究中提取 EGFR 突变亚组的 PFS 和 OS 的风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。我们使用固定效应模型和逆方差加权来估计化疗免疫联合治疗方案(联合或不联合 VEGF 抑制剂)与对照组的 PFS 和 OS 的总体效果大小。
共有 1772 名 EGFR 突变 NSCLC 患者纳入研究。与单纯化疗相比,联合程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)抑制剂可显著改善 PFS(HR 0.77,95%CI 0.67-0.88,P=0.0002)。当同时联合 PD-L1 和 VEGF 抑制时,效果更大(PFS:HR 0.62,95%CI 0.52-0.73,P<0.0001)。化疗联合 PD-L1 治疗的 OS 汇总 HR 为 0.86(95%CI 0.75-1.00,P=0.0429),而双重 PD-L1/VEGF 抑制的 OS 汇总 HR 为 0.98(95%CI 0.79-1.22,P=0.8463)。
尽管 PFS 有适度改善,当同时联合 PD-L1 和 VEGF 抑制剂时改善最为显著,但两种策略均未导致 OS 的临床意义改善。我们的结果不支持广泛使用化疗免疫联合治疗方案治疗 TKI 耐药的 EGFR 突变 NSCLC。对于驱动致癌基因的 NSCLC,迫切需要新的免疫治疗方法。