Chen I-Ting, Huang Hsu-Ching, Chiang Chi-Lu, Shen Chia-I, Tseng Yen-Han, Liao Ying-Ting, Chen Yuh-Min, Luo Yung-Hung
Department of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei, Taiwan.
School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Taipei, Taiwan.
Am J Cancer Res. 2025 Jul 15;15(7):3079-3092. doi: 10.62347/AIAN8664. eCollection 2025.
Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are the first-line treatment for advanced -mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite this, most patients experience tumor progression. The optimal immunotherapy (IO)-based strategy and its timing after EGFR-TKI failure remains under debate.
A retrospective analysis was performed to assess the outcomes for patients with -mutant NSCLC who were treated with either IO alone or in combination with chemotherapy (C/T) following disease progression. Data from January 2014 to December 2022 at Taipei Veterans General Hospital were reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF), while a Cox proportional hazards model evaluated the impact of clinical factors on survival.
This study enrolled 107 patients with advanced -mutant NSCLC, all of whom had previously been treated with first- to second-generation EGFR-TKIs. The IO alone group included 33 patients, while 74 patients were in the IO combined with chemotherapy (IO+C/T) group. The median number of prior treatment lines before immunotherapy was 2. The IO+C/T group demonstrated a trend toward longer OS compared to the IO alone group (OS: 20 vs. 16 months, P=0.70). Patients with more than four lines of treatment before IO-based therapy had significantly worse OS (6 vs. 29 months, P<0.001) and TTF (2 vs. 5, P=0.018) than those less than 4 lines of treatment. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients who had undergone more than 4 lines of treatment before IO-based therapy had poorer OS (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.16-4.21, P=0.01) and TTF (HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.11-3.19, P=0.019) compared to those with fewer than 4 lines of treatment. The HRs for OS were 4.32 (95% CI 1.95-9.61, P<0.001) for patients with more than 4 lines of treatment and 2.05 (95% CI 1.04-4.05, P=0.038) for those with 2-4 lines of treatment, in comparison to patients who had 0-1 lines of treatment.
This study highlights the potential benefits of early initiation of IO-based regimens in advanced -mutant NSCLC following EGFR-TKI failure. Combination therapy with chemotherapy showed a trend toward improved survival compared to IO monotherapy, although not statistically significant. Moreover, poorer outcomes associated with multiple prior treatments underscore the importance of timely implementation of IO-based strategies to optimize clinical benefit in this patient population.
表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)是晚期EGFR突变非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的一线治疗药物。尽管如此,大多数患者仍会出现肿瘤进展。基于免疫疗法(IO)的最佳策略及其在EGFR-TKI治疗失败后的时机仍存在争议。
进行一项回顾性分析,以评估疾病进展后接受单纯IO治疗或联合化疗(C/T)的EGFR突变NSCLC患者的预后。回顾了2014年1月至2022年12月台北荣民总医院的数据。采用Kaplan-Meier方法评估总生存期(OS)和治疗失败时间(TTF),同时使用Cox比例风险模型评估临床因素对生存的影响。
本研究纳入了107例晚期EGFR突变NSCLC患者,所有患者均曾接受过第一代至第二代EGFR-TKIs治疗。单纯IO组包括33例患者,而IO联合化疗(IO+C/T)组有74例患者。免疫治疗前的中位治疗线数为2。与单纯IO组相比,IO+C/T组显示出OS更长的趋势(OS:20个月对16个月,P=0.70)。在基于IO的治疗前接受超过4线治疗的患者,其OS(6个月对29个月,P<0.001)和TTF(2个月对5个月,P=0.018)明显差于接受少于4线治疗的患者。多变量分析显示,与接受少于4线治疗的患者相比,在基于IO的治疗前接受超过4线治疗的患者OS较差(HR 2.21,95%CI 1.16-4.21,P=0.01)和TTF较差(HR 1.89,95%CI 1.11-3.19,P=0.019)。与接受0-1线治疗的患者相比,接受超过4线治疗的患者OS的HR为4.32(95%CI 1.95-9.61,P<0.001),接受2-4线治疗的患者为2.05(95%CI 1.04-4.05,P=0.038)。
本研究强调了在EGFR-TKI治疗失败后,晚期EGFR突变NSCLC患者早期启动基于IO方案的潜在益处。与IO单药治疗相比,化疗联合治疗显示出生存改善的趋势,尽管无统计学意义。此外,多次先前治疗与较差的预后相关,这凸显了及时实施基于IO的策略以优化该患者群体临床获益的重要性。