Department of EEMCS, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands.
Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK.
Cell Rep Med. 2024 Aug 20;5(8):101687. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101687.
Combining drugs can enhance their clinical efficacy, but the number of possible combinations and inter-tumor heterogeneity make identifying effective combinations challenging, while existing approaches often overlook clinically relevant activity. We screen one of the largest cell line panels (N = 757) with 51 clinically relevant combinations and identify responses at the level of individual cell lines and tissue populations. We establish three response classes to model cellular effects beyond monotherapy: synergy, Bliss additivity, and independent drug action (IDA). Synergy is rare (11% of responses) and frequently efficacious (>50% viability reduction), whereas Bliss and IDA are more frequent but less frequently efficacious. We introduce "efficacious combination benefit" (ECB) to describe high-efficacy responses classified as either synergy, Bliss, or IDA. We identify ECB biomarkers in vitro and show that ECB predicts response in patient-derived xenografts better than synergy alone. Our work here provides a valuable resource and framework for preclinical evaluation and the development of combination treatments.
联合用药可以增强它们的临床疗效,但由于可能的组合数量和肿瘤间异质性,使得确定有效的组合具有挑战性,而现有的方法往往忽略了临床相关的活性。我们用 51 种具有临床相关性的组合筛选了最大的细胞系面板之一(N=757),并在单个细胞系和组织群体水平上确定了反应。我们建立了三个反应类别来模拟细胞的作用,超越了单一疗法:协同作用、 Bliss 加性和独立药物作用(IDA)。协同作用很少见(11%的反应),且效果显著(>50%的活力降低),而 Bliss 和 IDA 更为常见,但效果不那么显著。我们引入了“有效联合效益”(ECB)来描述被归类为协同作用、Bliss 或 IDA 的高疗效反应。我们在体外鉴定了 ECB 生物标志物,并表明 ECB 比单独的协同作用更能预测患者来源的异种移植物中的反应。我们的工作为临床前评估和联合治疗的开发提供了有价值的资源和框架。