School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Neuroscience. 2024 Oct 18;558:81-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.08.026. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
Sensorimotor adaptation alters mappings between motor commands and their predicted outcomes. Such remapping has been extensively studied in the visual domain, but the degree to which it occurs in modalities other than vision remains less well understood. Here, we manipulated the modality of reach target presentation to compare sensorimotor adaptation in response to perturbations of visual and auditory feedback location. We compared the extent of adaptation to perturbed sensory feedback for visual and auditory sensory modalities, and the magnitude of reach-direction aftereffects when the perturbation was removed. To isolate the contribution of implicit sensorimotor recalibration to adaptation in reach direction, we held sensory prediction errors and task-performance errors constant via a task-irrelevant clamp of sensory feedback. Seventy-two participants performed one of three experiments in which target location information and endpoint reach direction feedback were presented by loudspeakers (n = 24), headphones (n = 24), or a visual display (n = 24). Presentation durations for target stimuli (500 ms) and (non-veridical) endpoint feedback of reach direction (100 ms) were matched for visual and auditory modalities. For all three groups, when endpoint feedback was perturbed, adaptation was evident: reach-directions increased significantly in the direction opposite the clamped feedback, and a significant aftereffect persisted after participants were instructed that the perturbation had been removed. This study provides new evidence that implicit sensorimotor adaptation occurs in response to perturbed auditory feedback of reach direction, suggesting that an implicit neural process to recalibrate sensory to motor maps in response to sensory prediction errors may be ubiquitous across sensory modalities.
感觉运动适应改变了运动指令与其预测结果之间的映射关系。这种重映射在视觉领域得到了广泛研究,但在视觉以外的模态中,它的程度仍不太清楚。在这里,我们操纵了到达目标呈现的模态,以比较视觉和听觉反馈位置扰动下的感觉运动适应。我们比较了视觉和听觉感觉模态对扰动感觉反馈的适应程度,以及当去除扰动时的到达方向后效的大小。为了分离对到达方向的隐性感觉运动重新校准对适应的贡献,我们通过感官反馈的无关任务钳位使感觉预测误差和任务表现误差保持不变。72 名参与者参与了三个实验中的一个,其中目标位置信息和终点到达方向反馈由扬声器(n=24)、耳机(n=24)或视觉显示器(n=24)呈现。目标刺激的呈现持续时间(500 毫秒)和到达方向的非真实反馈(100 毫秒)在视觉和听觉模态之间匹配。对于所有三组,当终点反馈受到干扰时,适应是明显的:在与被钳位的反馈相反的方向上,到达方向显著增加,并且在参与者被指示去除扰动后,仍然存在显著的后效。这项研究提供了新的证据,表明隐性感觉运动适应会对到达方向的受扰听觉反馈做出反应,这表明,一种隐性的神经过程,即根据感觉预测误差重新校准感觉到运动图的过程,可能在所有感觉模态中都普遍存在。