Suppr超能文献

传出反馈和传入反馈对感觉运动时间校准的不同贡献。

Different contributions of efferent and reafferent feedback to sensorimotor temporal recalibration.

机构信息

Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Otto-Behaghel Strasse 10F, 35394, Giessen, Germany.

Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University Marburg and Justus Liebig University Giessen, Hans-Meerwein-Strasse 6, 35032, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 19;11(1):22631. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02016-5.

Abstract

Adaptation to delays between actions and sensory feedback is important for efficiently interacting with our environment. Adaptation may rely on predictions of action-feedback pairing (motor-sensory component), or predictions of tactile-proprioceptive sensation from the action and sensory feedback of the action (inter-sensory component). Reliability of temporal information might differ across sensory feedback modalities (e.g. auditory or visual), which in turn influences adaptation. Here, we investigated the role of motor-sensory and inter-sensory components on sensorimotor temporal recalibration for motor-auditory (button press-tone) and motor-visual (button press-Gabor patch) events. In the adaptation phase of the experiment, action-feedback pairs were presented with systematic temporal delays (0 ms or 150 ms). In the subsequent test phase, audio/visual feedback of the action were presented with variable delays. The participants were then asked whether they detected a delay. To disentangle motor-sensory from inter-sensory component, we varied movements (active button press or passive depression of button) at adaptation and test. Our results suggest that motor-auditory recalibration is mainly driven by the motor-sensory component, whereas motor-visual recalibration is mainly driven by the inter-sensory component. Recalibration transferred from vision to audition, but not from audition to vision. These results indicate that motor-sensory and inter-sensory components contribute to recalibration in a modality-dependent manner.

摘要

适应动作和感官反馈之间的延迟对于高效地与环境交互非常重要。适应可能依赖于动作-反馈配对的预测(运动-感觉成分),或者依赖于动作和动作反馈的触觉-本体感觉感觉的预测(感觉间成分)。不同感官反馈模态(例如听觉或视觉)的时间信息的可靠性可能不同,这反过来又会影响适应。在这里,我们研究了运动-感觉和感觉间成分对运动-听觉(按钮按下-音)和运动-视觉(按钮按下-Gabor 补丁)事件的感觉运动时间校准的作用。在实验的适应阶段,动作-反馈对呈现系统的时间延迟(0 ms 或 150 ms)。在随后的测试阶段,动作的音频/视觉反馈呈现可变的延迟。然后,参与者被要求检测是否存在延迟。为了将运动-感觉成分与感觉间成分分开,我们在适应和测试时改变了动作(主动按钮按下或被动按下按钮)。我们的结果表明,听觉运动的重新校准主要由运动-感觉成分驱动,而视觉运动的重新校准主要由感觉间成分驱动。从视觉到听觉的重新校准发生了转移,但从听觉到视觉的重新校准没有发生。这些结果表明,运动-感觉和感觉间成分以模态依赖的方式对重新校准做出贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac76/8604902/f8112fe118ad/41598_2021_2016_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验