J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2024 Nov-Dec;64(6):102215. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2024.102215. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
Pharmacy deserts represent areas where residents face notable challenges to accessing pharmacies. North Carolina (NC) presents an intriguing case study due to its diverse geographic landscape yet lacks extensive research regarding its pharmacy deserts.
This study aims to map pharmacy deserts in NC using pharmacy location and social determinants of health (SDOH) data measured using the social vulnerability index (SVI) and descriptively characterize health care utilization statistics for University of North Carolina (UNC) Health's catchment population.
Pharmacy location data was compiled from the NC Board of Pharmacy. Pharmacy deserts were defined based on SVI > 0.75 and distance thresholds aligned to United States Department of Agriculture standards. Residential characteristics were retrieved from PolicyMap and Social Explorer databases. UNC Health patient utilization data were collected by UNC Pharmacy Data Analytics group for 3 NC counties.
Two thousand and two NC pharmacies met inclusion criteria. 17.2% urban tracts (1.3M residents) and 4.25% rural tracts (0.14M residents) were identified as pharmacy deserts (adj. P < 0.001). Those residing in deserts had significantly less internet access, annual medical cost per capita, and access to homeless relief services as well as significantly higher food insecurity rates and Medicare cost per capita (adj. P < 0.001). UNC-specific health care utilization statistics for the 3 assessed counties were all poorer in deserts compared to nondeserts within the same counties (P > 0.05).
A geospatial map with the location of pharmacy deserts in NC was created to highlight differences in patient health care utilization, affecting rural and urban areas. By incorporating SDOH predictors, this study provides a more nuanced map of NC pharmacy deserts compared to reviewing distance to pharmacies alone. Higher rates of emergency department and inpatient visits in counties with more residents in pharmacy deserts suggests potential health outcomes associated with limited pharmacy access.
药剂师荒漠代表着居民在获取药剂师服务方面面临显著挑战的地区。北卡罗来纳州(NC)是一个有趣的案例研究对象,因为其拥有多样化的地理景观,但缺乏关于其药剂师荒漠的广泛研究。
本研究旨在使用药剂位置和健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)数据(使用社会脆弱性指数[SVI]测量)绘制 NC 的药剂师荒漠图,并描述性地描述北卡罗来纳大学健康系统(UNC Health)集水区人口的医疗保健利用统计数据。
药剂位置数据由 NC 药剂委员会汇编。根据 SVI>0.75和与美国农业部标准一致的距离阈值,定义了药剂师荒漠。从 PolicyMap 和 Social Explorer 数据库中检索住宅特征。UNC 健康患者利用数据由 UNC 药房数据分析组收集了 3 个 NC 县的数据。
符合纳入标准的 NC 药房有 2022 家。有 17.2%的城市区(130 万居民)和 4.25%的农村区(14 万居民)被确定为药剂师荒漠(adj. P < 0.001)。居住在荒漠地区的人,其互联网接入、人均年度医疗费用、获得无家可归救济服务的机会显著减少,而粮食不安全率和人均医疗保险费用显著增加(adj. P < 0.001)。与同一县内非荒漠地区相比,3 个评估县的 UNC 特定医疗保健利用统计数据在荒漠地区都更差(P > 0.05)。
创建了一张带有 NC 药剂师荒漠位置的地理空间地图,以突出患者医疗保健利用方面的差异,影响农村和城市地区。通过纳入 SDOH 预测因素,本研究提供了一张比仅查看与药剂师的距离更细致的 NC 药剂师荒漠地图。在药剂师荒漠中居民比例较高的县,急诊室和住院就诊的次数更多,这表明与有限的药剂师获取机会相关的潜在健康结果。