• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在急性髓系白血病的异基因移植中,白消安-氟达拉滨与白消安-环磷酰胺的比较:GITMO AML-R2 试验的长期分析。

Busulfan-fludarabine versus busulfan-cyclophosphamide for allogeneic transplant in acute myeloid leukemia: long term analysis of GITMO AML-R2 trial.

机构信息

Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.

SSD Trapianto Cellule Staminali, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Blood Cancer J. 2024 Aug 21;14(1):141. doi: 10.1038/s41408-024-01116-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41408-024-01116-5
PMID:39168989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11339290/
Abstract

We report the long-term results of a randomized trial (GITMO, AML-R2), comparing 1:1 the combination of busulfan and cyclophosphamide (BuCy2, n = 125) and the combination of busulfan and fludarabine (BuFlu, n = 127) as conditioning regimen in acute myeloid leukemia patients (median age 51 years, range 40-65) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. With a median follow-up of 6 years, significantly better non-relapse mortality (NRM) was confirmed in BuFlu recipients, which is sustained up to 4 years after transplant (10% vs. 20%, p = 0.0388). This difference was higher in patients older than 51 years (11% in BuFlu vs. 27% in BuCy2, p = 0.0262). The cumulative incidence of relapse, which was the first cause of death in the entire study population, did not differ between the two randomized arms. Similarly, the leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) were not different in the two cohorts, even when stratifying patients per median age. Graft-and relapse-free survival (GRFS) in BuFlu arm vs. the BuCy2 arm was 25% vs. 20% at 4 years and 20% vs. 17% at 10 years. Hence, the benefit gained by NRM reduction is not offsets by an increased relapse. Leukemia relapse remains a major concern, urging the development of new therapeutic approaches.

摘要

我们报告了一项随机试验(GITMO、AML-R2)的长期结果,比较了 1:1 组合的白消安和环磷酰胺(BuCy2,n=125)和白消安和氟达拉滨(BuFlu,n=127)作为急性髓系白血病患者(中位年龄 51 岁,范围 40-65 岁)异基因造血干细胞移植的预处理方案。中位随访 6 年后,BuFlu 组的非复发死亡率(NRM)显著降低得到证实,这一差异在移植后 4 年内持续存在(10%比 20%,p=0.0388)。在年龄大于 51 岁的患者中,这种差异更高(BuFlu 组为 11%,BuCy2 组为 27%,p=0.0262)。在整个研究人群中,复发是导致死亡的首要原因,两个随机治疗组之间的累积复发率没有差异。同样,两组患者的无白血病生存率(LFS)和总生存率(OS)也没有差异,即使按中位年龄分层。BuFlu 组与 BuCy2 组的移植物抗白血病复发生存率(GRFS)在 4 年时分别为 25%和 20%,在 10 年时分别为 20%和 17%。因此,NRM 降低带来的益处并未被复发增加所抵消。白血病复发仍然是一个主要问题,这促使人们开发新的治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30e4/11339290/d7d5b6635b99/41408_2024_1116_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30e4/11339290/029e4e672657/41408_2024_1116_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30e4/11339290/01303907e91d/41408_2024_1116_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30e4/11339290/5eee2c9f288b/41408_2024_1116_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30e4/11339290/d7d5b6635b99/41408_2024_1116_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30e4/11339290/029e4e672657/41408_2024_1116_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30e4/11339290/01303907e91d/41408_2024_1116_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30e4/11339290/5eee2c9f288b/41408_2024_1116_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30e4/11339290/d7d5b6635b99/41408_2024_1116_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Busulfan-fludarabine versus busulfan-cyclophosphamide for allogeneic transplant in acute myeloid leukemia: long term analysis of GITMO AML-R2 trial.在急性髓系白血病的异基因移植中,白消安-氟达拉滨与白消安-环磷酰胺的比较:GITMO AML-R2 试验的长期分析。
Blood Cancer J. 2024 Aug 21;14(1):141. doi: 10.1038/s41408-024-01116-5.
2
Tolerability and efficacy of busulfan and fludarabine as allogeneic pretransplant conditioning therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: comparison with busulfan and cyclophosphamide regimen.白消安与氟达拉滨作为急性髓性白血病异基因移植前预处理疗法的耐受性和疗效:与白消安和环磷酰胺方案的比较
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2014 Dec;14(6):493-500. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2014.04.006. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
3
Busulfan plus fludarabine as a myeloablative conditioning regimen compared with busulfan plus cyclophosphamide for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a prospective and multicenter study.在接受异基因造血干细胞移植的首次完全缓解的急性髓系白血病患者中,与白消安加环磷酰胺相比,白消安加氟达拉滨作为清髓性预处理方案:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
J Hematol Oncol. 2013 Feb 8;6:15. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-6-15.
4
Thiotepa, busulfan and fludarabine compared to busulfan and cyclophosphamide as conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplant from matched siblings and unrelated donors for acute myeloid leukemia.噻替哌、白消安和氟达拉滨与白消安和环磷酰胺相比,作为急性髓系白血病患者接受来自匹配的同胞供体和无关供体的异基因干细胞移植的预处理方案。
Am J Hematol. 2018 Oct;93(10):1211-1219. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25225. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
5
[A comparison of toxicity and efficacy between busulfan plus fludarabine and busulfan plus cyclophosphamide for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia].白消安联合氟达拉滨与白消安联合环磷酰胺用于急性髓系白血病异基因造血干细胞移植的毒性和疗效比较
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Nov;51(11):880-4.
6
Idarubicin-intensified BUCY2 conditioning regimen improved survival in high-risk acute myeloid, but not lymphocytic leukemia patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A retrospective comparative study.伊达比星强化的BUCY2预处理方案改善了接受异基因造血干细胞移植的高危急性髓系白血病患者的生存率,但对淋巴细胞白血病患者无效:一项回顾性比较研究。
Leuk Res. 2016 Jul;46:61-8. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
7
Busulfan plus cyclophosphamide versus busulfan plus fludarabine as a preparative regimen for allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.白消安联合环磷酰胺与白消安联合氟达拉滨作为急性髓系白血病患者异基因造血干细胞移植的预处理方案:一项开放标签、多中心、随机、3 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Nov;16(15):1525-1536. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00200-4. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
8
Fludarabine-treosulfan versus fludarabine-melphalan or busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning in older AML or MDS patients - A clinical trial to registry data comparison.氟达拉滨-曲奥舒凡与氟达拉滨-马法兰或白消安-环磷酰胺预处理在老年 AML 或 MDS 患者中的比较:临床试验与注册数据比较。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024 May;59(5):670-679. doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02241-2. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
9
Fludarabine-treosulfan compared to thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine or FLAMSA as conditioning regimen for patients with primary refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: a study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT).氟达拉滨-曲奥舒凡与噻替派-白消安-氟达拉滨或 FLAMSA 作为原发性难治或复发急性髓系白血病患者的预处理方案:来自欧洲血液和骨髓移植学会(EBMT)急性白血病工作组的一项研究。
J Hematol Oncol. 2019 Apr 25;12(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0727-4.
10
Feasibility of non-TBI conditioning with busulfan and fludarabine for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in lymphoid malignancy.在淋巴恶性肿瘤中采用白消安和氟达拉滨进行非 TBI 预处理并进行同种异体干细胞移植的可行性。
Korean J Intern Med. 2012 Mar;27(1):72-83. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2012.27.1.72. Epub 2012 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Conditioning Intensity on Survival in Adult Patients (< 65 Years) With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Antithymocyte Globulin and Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide Based GVHD Prophylaxis.预处理强度对接受抗胸腺细胞球蛋白和基于移植后环磷酰胺的移植物抗宿主病预防的急性髓系白血病成年患者(<65岁)生存的影响
Eur J Haematol. 2025 Sep;115(3):251-259. doi: 10.1111/ejh.14438. Epub 2025 May 28.
2
Busulfan-cyclophosphamide vs fludarabine-busulfan for allogeneic transplant in acute myeloid leukemia.白消安-环磷酰胺与氟达拉滨-白消安用于急性髓系白血病异基因移植的比较
Future Oncol. 2025 Jun;21(15):1887-1894. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2507563. Epub 2025 May 28.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Busulfan Plus Fludarabine Compared With Busulfan Plus Cyclophosphamide for AML Undergoing HLA-Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Multicenter Randomized Phase III Trial.在 HLA 单倍体相合造血细胞移植治疗 AML 中,白消安联合氟达拉滨与白消安联合环磷酰胺的比较:一项多中心随机 III 期试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct 10;41(29):4632-4642. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00101. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
2
Total body irradiation plus fludarabine versus busulfan plus fludarabine as a myeloablative conditioning for adults with acute myeloid leukemia treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. A study on behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT.全身照射联合氟达拉滨与白消安联合氟达拉滨作为接受异基因造血细胞移植治疗的成人急性髓系白血病的清髓性预处理方案。一项代表欧洲血液与骨髓移植协会急性白血病工作组开展的研究。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2023 Mar;58(3):282-287. doi: 10.1038/s41409-022-01882-5. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
3
Editorial: Allogenic hematopoietic cell transplant in hematological malignancies: controversies and perspective.
社论:血液系统恶性肿瘤中的异基因造血细胞移植:争议与展望
Front Oncol. 2025 Mar 19;15:1582751. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1582751. eCollection 2025.
Comparative study of treosulfan plus Fludarabine (FT14) with busulfan plus Fludarabine (FB4) for acute myeloid leukemia in first or second complete remission: An analysis from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP).Treosulfan 联合氟达拉滨(FT14)与白消安联合氟达拉滨(FB4)用于首次或第二次完全缓解的急性髓系白血病的比较研究:来自欧洲血液和骨髓移植学会(EBMT)急性白血病工作组(ALWP)的分析。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2022 Dec;57(12):1803-1809. doi: 10.1038/s41409-022-01830-3. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
4
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation improves long-term outcome for relapsed AML patients across all ages: results from two East German Study Group Hematology and Oncology (OSHO) trials.异基因造血干细胞移植可改善所有年龄段复发 AML 患者的长期预后:来自两个东德血液学和肿瘤学研究组(OSHO)试验的结果。
Ann Hematol. 2021 Sep;100(9):2387-2398. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04565-1. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
5
Myeloablative versus Reduced-Intensity Conditioning for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes-Long-Term Follow-Up of the BMT CTN 0901 Clinical Trial.清髓性与强度降低性预处理方案在急性髓系白血病和骨髓增生异常综合征造血干细胞移植中的应用:BMT CTN 0901 临床试验的长期随访结果。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2021 Jun;27(6):483.e1-483.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.02.031. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
6
Augmented Reduced-Intensity Regimen Does Not Improve Postallogeneic Transplant Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.增强的减低强度方案并不能改善急性髓系白血病患者异基因移植后的结局。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;39(7):768-778. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02308. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
7
Current Use of and Trends in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in the United States.美国造血细胞移植的当前使用情况及趋势
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Aug;26(8):e177-e182. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.04.013. Epub 2020 May 11.
8
Treosulfan or busulfan plus fludarabine as conditioning treatment before allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation for older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (MC-FludT.14/L): a randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.对于老年急性髓系白血病或骨髓增生异常综合征患者,在异基因造血干细胞移植前采用曲奥舒凡或白消安加氟达拉滨作为预处理方案(MC-FludT.14/L):一项随机、非劣效性3期试验。
Lancet Haematol. 2020 Jan;7(1):e28-e39. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30157-7. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
9
Long-term efficacy of reduced-intensity versus myeloablative conditioning before allogeneic haemopoietic cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia in first complete remission: retrospective follow-up of an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.首次完全缓解的急性髓系白血病患者异基因造血细胞移植前,减低强度预处理与清髓性预处理的长期疗效:一项开放标签、随机3期试验的回顾性随访
Lancet Haematol. 2018 Apr;5(4):e161-e169. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30022-X. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
10
Long-term complications after hematopoietic cell transplantation.造血细胞移植后的长期并发症。
Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2017 Dec;10(4):220-227. doi: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 Jun 13.