Suppr超能文献

首次完全缓解的急性髓系白血病患者异基因造血细胞移植前,减低强度预处理与清髓性预处理的长期疗效:一项开放标签、随机3期试验的回顾性随访

Long-term efficacy of reduced-intensity versus myeloablative conditioning before allogeneic haemopoietic cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia in first complete remission: retrospective follow-up of an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.

作者信息

Fasslrinner Frederick, Schetelig Johannes, Burchert Andreas, Kramer Michael, Trenschel Rudolf, Hegenbart Ute, Stadler Michael, Schäfer-Eckart Kerstin, Bätzel Michael, Eich Hans, Stuschke Martin, Engenhart-Cabillic Rita, Krause Mechthild, Dreger Peter, Neubauer Andreas, Ehninger Gerhard, Beelen Dietrich, Berdel Wolfgang E, Siepmann Timo, Stelljes Matthias, Bornhäuser Martin

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany; Division of Health Care Sciences, Center for Clinical Research and Management Education, Dresden International University, Dresden, Germany.

Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Lancet Haematol. 2018 Apr;5(4):e161-e169. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30022-X. Epub 2018 Mar 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of the intensity of conditioning before allogeneic haemopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been studied in a randomised phase 3 trial comparing reduced-intensity conditioning with myeloablative conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia in first complete remission. Because of the short follow-up of the original trial, whether reduced-intensity conditioning increases the risk of late relapse compared with myeloablative conditioning remained unclear. To address this question, we present retrospective 10-year follow-up data of this trial and focus on late relapse.

METHODS

The original randomised phase 3 trial included patients aged 18-60 years, with intermediate-risk or high-risk acute myeloid leukaemia, an adequate organ function, and an available HLA-matched sibling donor or an unrelated donor with at least nine out of ten HLA alleles matched. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to 120 mg/m fludarabine combined with four 2 Gy doses of total-body irradiation (reduced-intensity conditioning) or six 2 Gy doses of total-body irradiation and 120 mg/kg cyclophosphamide (myeloablative conditioning). The primary and secondary efficacy endpoints of this trial have been published previously. In this retrospective, long-term follow-up analysis, data were collected from medical reports from individual participating study centres, and from physician and patient interviews. Endpoints included in this analysis were cumulative relapse incidence, overall survival, disease-free survival, and non-relapse mortality in the original study population and in patients alive and relapse-free at 12 months after HCT (landmark analysis). 10-year time to event rates were calculated in the intention-to-treat population and were compared with the Gray test. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00150878.

FINDINGS

In the original trial, 195 patients were randomly assigned to receive reduced-intensity conditioning (n=99) or myeloablative conditioning (n=96). For this retrospective analysis, data were collected with a nearly complete follow-up (completeness index 99%). Median follow-up time for surviving patients was 9·9 years (IQR 8·5-11·4), during which the cumulative incidence of relapse in the complete study population was identical in both groups (30% [95% CI 20-39] in the reduced-intensity conditioning group vs 30% [21-40] in the myeloablative conditioning group; Gray test p=0·99). Relapse occurred at a median of 5·0 months (IQR 3·0-8·8) in the reduced-intensity conditioning group versus 9·5 months (4·5-20·5) in the myeloablative conditioning group. 10-year disease-free survival was 55% (95% CI 45-66) in the reduced-intensity conditioning group and 43% (34-55) in the myeloablative conditioning group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·76 [0·51-1·14]; p=0·19). 10-year non-relapse mortality was 16% (95% CI 8-24) in the reduced-intensity conditioning group and 26% (17-36) in the myeloablative conditioning group (subdistribution HR 0·60 [95% CI 0·32-1·11]; Gray test p=0·10). The incidence of long-term toxicities associated with total-body irradiation was comparable; secondary malignancies occurred in six (6%) of 94 patients in the reduced-intensity conditioning group and five (6%) of 90 in the myeloablative conditioning group (p=1·00).

INTERPRETATION

There is no evidence that reduced-intensity conditioning increases the risk of late relapse compared with myeloablative conditioning. Given that the reduced-intensity conditioning group in the original trial was associated with lower early morbidity and toxicity, reduced-intensity conditioning with moderately reduced total-body irradiation doses could be the preferred conditioning strategy for patients with acute myeloid leukaemia who are younger than 60 years and transplanted in first complete remission.

FUNDING

None.

摘要

背景

在一项3期随机试验中,对首次完全缓解的急性髓系白血病患者进行了异基因造血细胞移植(HCT)前预处理强度的影响研究,该试验比较了低强度预处理与清髓性预处理。由于原试验随访时间较短,与清髓性预处理相比,低强度预处理是否会增加晚期复发风险仍不清楚。为解决这一问题,我们提供了该试验10年的回顾性随访数据,并重点关注晚期复发情况。

方法

原3期随机试验纳入了年龄在18 - 60岁、患有中危或高危急性髓系白血病、器官功能良好且有可用的HLA匹配同胞供者或至少10个HLA等位基因中有9个匹配的无关供者的患者。患者被随机分配(1:1)接受120 mg/m氟达拉滨联合4次2 Gy全身照射(低强度预处理)或6次2 Gy全身照射及120 mg/kg环磷酰胺(清髓性预处理)。该试验的主要和次要疗效终点此前已发表。在这项回顾性长期随访分析中,数据收集自各个参与研究中心的医疗报告以及医生和患者访谈。本分析纳入的终点包括原研究人群以及HCT后12个月存活且无复发患者(标志性分析)的累积复发发生率、总生存期、无病生存期和非复发死亡率。在意向性治疗人群中计算10年事件发生率,并与Gray检验进行比较。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号为NCT00150878。

结果

在原试验中,195例患者被随机分配接受低强度预处理(n = 99)或清髓性预处理(n = 96)。对于这项回顾性分析,数据收集的随访几乎完整(完整性指数99%)。存活患者的中位随访时间为9.9年(IQR 8.5 - 11.4),在此期间,完整研究人群中两组的累积复发发生率相同(低强度预处理组为30% [95% CI 20 - 39],清髓性预处理组为30% [21 - 40];Gray检验p = 0.99)。低强度预处理组复发的中位时间为5.0个月(IQR 3.0 - 8.8),清髓性预处理组为9.5个月(4.5 - 20.5)。低强度预处理组10年无病生存率为55%(95% CI 45 - 66),清髓性预处理组为43%(34 - 55)(风险比[HR] 0.76 [0.51 - 1.14];p = 0.19)。低强度预处理组10年非复发死亡率为16%(95% CI 8 - 24),清髓性预处理组为26%(17 - 36)(亚分布HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.32 - 1.11];Gray检验p = 0.10)。与全身照射相关的长期毒性发生率相当;低强度预处理组94例患者中有6例(6%)发生继发性恶性肿瘤,清髓性预处理组90例患者中有5例(6%)发生(p = 1.00)。

解读

没有证据表明与清髓性预处理相比,低强度预处理会增加晚期复发风险。鉴于原试验中低强度预处理组早期发病率和毒性较低,对于年龄小于60岁且首次完全缓解时接受移植的急性髓系白血病患者,采用全身照射剂量适度降低的低强度预处理可能是首选的预处理策略。

资金来源

无。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验