Suppr超能文献

美国和中国肿瘤药物附条件批准的上市后要求分析。

Analysis of post-marketing requirements for oncology drug conditional approvals in the United States and China.

作者信息

Ge Chenghao, An Jing, Chen Xiaoyuan

机构信息

Tsinghua Clinical Research Institute, Tsinghua Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

R&G PharmaStudies Co. Ltd, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Jul 30;10(15):e35454. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35454. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conditional approvals, also known as accelerated approvals, have been introduced by many pharmaceutical regulators around the world, allowing innovative drugs to enter the market earlier on the basis of limited evidence. This research aims to systematically analyze and compare the post-marketing requirements for conditional approvals of oncology drugs in China and the United States. By collecting and categorizing different types of post-marketing requirements, this study seeks to elucidate how these requirements are proposed and discern the underlying logic and patterns.

METHODS

This study delved into oncology drug approvals, encompassing FDA accelerated approvals (up to December 31, 2022) and NMPA conditional approvals (from 2017 to December 31, 2022). Leveraging review documents from FDA and NMPA, comprehensive data on product characteristics, all post-marketing commitments and requirements, and especially those related to confirmatory requirements were extracted. The analysis incorporated descriptive statistics, visualizations such as Upset plots, and thorough examination of confirmatory requirement timeframes.

FINDINGS

This study examined 168 FDA accelerated approvals and 41 NMPA conditional approvals for oncology indications. Post-marketing requirements displayed diversity: FDA emphasized confirmatory studies, clinical pharmacology studies, and more, while NMPA predominantly focused on confirmatory studies. Confirmatory requirement timeframes indicated higher FDA-required completion times for new confirmatory trials compared to continued completion of original pivotal trials. In contrast, NMPA's requirement patterns were comparatively singular, with relatively fixed timeframes. FDA's evolving trend showed decreasing timeframes over time, suggesting an increasing demand for timely confirmatory data.

INTERPRETATION

Conditional approvals offer a unique approach to bring potentially life-saving drugs to the market faster, despite limited supporting evidence. Our analysis of oncology drug conditional approvals in the U.S. and China reveals diverse post-marketing requirement patterns. This study provides valuable insights for regulatory decision-making in a dynamic pharmaceutical landscape. Balancing the risks and rewards of conditional approvals is crucial in ensuring both patient safety and timely access to innovative treatments.

摘要

背景

有条件批准,也称为加速批准,已被全球许多药品监管机构采用,允许创新药物在有限证据的基础上更早进入市场。本研究旨在系统分析和比较中国和美国肿瘤药物有条件批准的上市后要求。通过收集和分类不同类型的上市后要求,本研究旨在阐明这些要求是如何提出的,并识别其潜在逻辑和模式。

方法

本研究深入探讨了肿瘤药物批准情况,包括美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的加速批准(截至2022年12月31日)和国家药品监督管理局(NMPA)的有条件批准(2017年至2022年12月31日)。利用FDA和NMPA的审评文件,提取了关于产品特性、所有上市后承诺和要求,特别是与确证性要求相关的全面数据。分析包括描述性统计、如交集图等可视化方法,以及对确证性要求时间框架的深入研究。

结果

本研究审查了168项FDA加速批准的肿瘤适应症和41项NMPA有条件批准的肿瘤适应症。上市后要求呈现出多样性:FDA强调确证性研究、临床药理学研究等,而NMPA主要侧重于确证性研究。确证性要求时间框架表明,与继续完成原关键试验相比,FDA对新的确证性试验要求的完成时间更高。相比之下,NMPA的要求模式相对单一,时间框架相对固定。FDA的发展趋势显示随着时间推移时间框架在缩短,表明对及时确证性数据的需求在增加。

解读

有条件批准提供了一种独特的方法,能够在支持证据有限的情况下更快地将潜在的救命药物推向市场。我们对美国和中国肿瘤药物有条件批准的分析揭示了不同的上市后要求模式。本研究为动态的制药环境中的监管决策提供了有价值的见解。在确保患者安全和及时获得创新治疗的同时,平衡有条件批准的风险和收益至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ae3/11336774/cc257147a8af/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验