Department of Radiodiagnosis, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India., Mangalore, Karnataka, 575001, India.
F1000Res. 2024 Jul 18;11:1272. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.125896.2. eCollection 2022.
Acute pancreatitis (AP) has unpredictable severity. Its management is based on initial assessment of disease severity. It ranges from mild interstitial to severe necrotic form; the latter is associated with poor prognosis. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen is the gold standard in early detection of pancreatic necrosis and in assessing the severity of AP. Two CT grading systems exist to assess the severity of AP: CT severity Index (CSI) and modified CSI (MCSI). This study compares the usefulness of these two systems in predicting the severity and clinical outcome in AP in comparison with Ranson's criteria and clinical outcome parameters. This is a prospective hospital-based screening study of 80 patients aged >12 years with clinical diagnosis of AP who underwent contrast-enhanced CT study of the abdomen. Comparative analysis between MCSI and CSI with Ranson's criteria and clinical outcome parameters was assessed by Chi-Squared test. The accuracy of CSI and MCSI in predicting the requirement of critical care, superadded infection, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and requirement of intervention were 73.0%, 64.5%, 69.8% 60.9% and 77.2%, 76.0%, 74.4% & 56.6% respectively. Area under the curve for MCSI score was significantly higher (AUC: 0.861; 95% CI: 0.736-0.986) than CSI score (AUC:0.815;95% CI:0.749-0.941). MCSI and CSI showed significant correlation with Ranson's criteria; however, MCSI correlation was better (r:0.53; p<0.01) than CSI (r:0.35;p:0.04). CSI and MCSI are better predictors of severity, clinical outcome and mortality compared with Ranson's criteria, with MCSI being more accurate and better predictor than CSI. The accuracy of MCSI is better than CSI for prediction of requirement of critical care, development of superadded infection and development of MODS in AP. However, CSI and MCSI have low accuracy in predicting intervention in AP.
急性胰腺炎(AP)的严重程度难以预测。其治疗基于对疾病严重程度的初步评估。它的范围从轻度间质到严重坏死型;后者与预后不良相关。腹部对比增强计算机断层扫描(CT)是早期发现胰腺坏死和评估 AP 严重程度的金标准。目前存在两种 CT 分级系统来评估 AP 的严重程度:CT 严重指数(CSI)和改良 CSI(MCSI)。本研究比较了这两种系统在预测 AP 的严重程度和临床预后方面的有用性,与 Ranson 标准和临床预后参数进行比较。这是一项针对年龄大于 12 岁的有临床诊断为 AP 的 80 例患者的前瞻性基于医院的筛查研究,这些患者接受了腹部增强 CT 检查。通过卡方检验对 MCSI 和 CSI 与 Ranson 标准和临床预后参数进行了比较分析。CSI 和 MCSI 预测需要重症监护、继发感染、多器官功能障碍综合征(MODS)和需要干预的准确性分别为 73.0%、64.5%、69.8%和 60.9%、77.2%、76.0%、74.4%和 56.6%。MCSI 评分的曲线下面积明显更高(AUC:0.861;95%CI:0.736-0.986),而 CSI 评分(AUC:0.815;95%CI:0.749-0.941)。MCSI 和 CSI 与 Ranson 标准有显著相关性;然而,MCSI 的相关性更好(r:0.53;p<0.01),而 CSI 的相关性较差(r:0.35;p:0.04)。与 Ranson 标准相比,CSI 和 MCSI 是预测严重程度、临床预后和死亡率的更好指标,其中 MCSI 比 CSI 更准确、更能预测。MCSI 在预测 AP 患者需要重症监护、继发感染和 MODS 的发生方面比 CSI 更准确。然而,CSI 和 MCSI 在预测 AP 中的干预方面准确性较低。