Xie Fangfang, Wagh Ajay, Wu Ruolan, Hogarth D Kyle, Sun Jiayuan
Department of Respiratory Endoscopy, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.
Chin Med J Pulm Crit Care Med. 2023 Mar 21;1(1):30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pccm.2023.01.001. eCollection 2023 Mar.
More peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) are detected by low-dose helical computed tomography (CT) either incidentally or via dedicated lung cancer screening programs. Thus, using methods for safe and accurate diagnosis of these lesions has become increasingly important. Transthoracic needle aspiration (TTNA) and transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) are routinely performed during the diagnostic workup for PPLs. However, TTNA often carries the risk of pneumothorax, uncontrollable airway hemorrhage, and does not allow mediastinal staging in one procedure. In contrast, traditional TBLB often has a poorer diagnostic yield despite fewer complications. With the ongoing development of technology applied to bronchoscopy, guided bronchoscopy has become widely used and the diagnostic yield of TBLB has improved. Additionally, guided bronchoscopy continues to demonstrate a better safety profile than TTNA. In recent years, robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) has been introduced and implemented in the diagnosis of PPLs. At present, RAB has two platforms that are commercially available: Monarch™ and Ion™; several other platforms are under development. Both systems differ in characteristics, advantages, and limitations and offer features not seen in previous guided bronchoscopy. Several studies, including cadaveric model studies and clinical trials, have been conducted to examine the feasibility and performance of RAB using these two systems; large multicenter studies are underway. In this review, published experimental results, focusing on diagnostic yield and complications of RAB, are analyzed and the potential clinical application of RAB is discussed, which will enable the operators to have a clear overview of RAB.
通过低剂量螺旋计算机断层扫描(CT)偶然发现或通过专门的肺癌筛查计划检测到的外周肺病变(PPL)越来越多。因此,采用安全准确的方法诊断这些病变变得越来越重要。在PPL的诊断检查过程中,常规进行经胸针吸活检(TTNA)和经支气管肺活检(TBLB)。然而,TTNA常常伴有气胸、无法控制的气道出血风险,并且无法在一次操作中进行纵隔分期。相比之下,传统的TBLB尽管并发症较少,但诊断率往往较低。随着应用于支气管镜检查的技术不断发展,引导支气管镜检查已得到广泛应用,TBLB的诊断率有所提高。此外,引导支气管镜检查的安全性仍优于TTNA。近年来,机器人辅助支气管镜检查(RAB)已被引入并应用于PPL的诊断。目前,RAB有两个商业可用平台:Monarch™和Ion™;其他几个平台正在开发中。这两个系统在特性、优点和局限性方面存在差异,并提供了以前引导支气管镜检查中未见的功能。已经进行了多项研究,包括尸体模型研究和临床试验,以检验使用这两个系统的RAB的可行性和性能;大型多中心研究正在进行中。在这篇综述中,分析了已发表的侧重于RAB诊断率和并发症的实验结果,并讨论了RAB的潜在临床应用,这将使操作人员能够清楚地了解RAB。