• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stenting in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.急性冠状动脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架置入术后的短期双联抗血小板治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Dec 1;9(12):1094-1105. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3216.
2
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with CAD Undergoing Drug-eluting Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.比较 CAD 患者接受药物洗脱支架置入术后双联抗血小板治疗持续时间的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Curr Pharm Des. 2020;26(44):5739-5745. doi: 10.2174/1381612826666200625110349.
3
De-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者双联抗血小板治疗的降阶梯治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 May 22;29(3):171-186. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112476.
4
P2Y inhibitor or aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention: individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后使用P2Y抑制剂或阿司匹林:随机临床试验的个体患者数据荟萃分析
BMJ. 2025 Jun 4;389:e082561. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-082561.
5
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with and without Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者中 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与双联抗血小板治疗的疗效和安全性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Apr 20;23(9):4549. doi: 10.3390/ijms23094549.
6
Antiplatelet Strategy for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.急性冠状动脉综合征行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的抗血小板策略:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Oct 15;13(20):e032490. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.032490. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
7
Short-Term DAPT and DAPT De-Escalation Strategies for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.短期 DAPT 与急性冠状动脉综合征患者的 DAPT 降级策略:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Sep;16(9):e013242. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013242. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
8
P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy versus aspirin monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy for percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.短期双联抗血小板治疗后 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与阿司匹林单药治疗用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:来自随机试验网络荟萃分析的见解。
Am Heart J. 2020 Sep;227:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.06.008. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
9
Strategy of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者的双联抗血小板治疗策略:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Oct 15;389:131157. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131157. Epub 2023 Jul 9.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Medication Beliefs Regarding P2Y12 Inhibitors: An Exploratory Thematic and Semantic Analysis to Better Understand the Key Barriers to Medication Adherence.关于P2Y12抑制剂的用药观念:一项探索性的主题和语义分析,以更好地理解用药依从性的关键障碍。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 13;17(6):e85924. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85924. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Antiplatelet Therapy in Low-Platelet-Count Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血小板计数低的患者的抗血小板治疗
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 27;14(3):838. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030838.

本文引用的文献

1
Ticagrelor alone versus ticagrelor plus aspirin from month 1 to month 12 after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ULTIMATE-DAPT): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial.替格瑞洛单用或替格瑞洛加阿司匹林用于急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 1 至 12 个月(ULTIMATE-DAPT):一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲临床试验。
Lancet. 2024 May 11;403(10439):1866-1878. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00473-2. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
2
P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Deployment of a Drug-Eluting Stent: The SHARE Randomized Clinical Trial.在药物洗脱支架置入后,P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与双联抗血小板治疗的比较:SHARE 随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e240877. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0877.
3
Stopping Aspirin Within 1 Month After Stenting for Ticagrelor Monotherapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome: The T-PASS Randomized Noninferiority Trial.支架置入后 1 个月内停用阿司匹林行替格瑞洛单药治疗急性冠状动脉综合征:T-PASS 随机非劣效性试验。
Circulation. 2024 Feb 20;149(8):562-573. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.066943. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
4
2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes.2023年欧洲心脏病学会急性冠状动脉综合征管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-3826. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191.
5
Short-Term DAPT and DAPT De-Escalation Strategies for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.短期 DAPT 与急性冠状动脉综合征患者的 DAPT 降级策略:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Sep;16(9):e013242. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013242. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
6
P2Y Inhibitor or Aspirin Monotherapy for Secondary Prevention of Coronary Events.P2Y 抑制剂或阿司匹林单药治疗用于冠心病事件的二级预防。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Jul 11;82(2):89-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.04.051.
7
Kenward-Roger-type corrections for inference methods of network meta-analysis and meta-regression.肯沃德-罗杰型校正在网络荟萃分析和荟萃回归推断方法中的应用。
Res Synth Methods. 2023 Sep;14(5):731-741. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1652. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
8
A guide and pragmatic considerations for applying GRADE to network meta-analysis.将GRADE应用于网状Meta分析的指南及实际考量
BMJ. 2023 Jun 27;381:e074495. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-074495.
9
Defining Strategies of Modulation of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Consensus Document from the Academic Research Consortium.定义冠心病患者抗血小板治疗的调节策略:来自学术研究联盟的共识文件。
Circulation. 2023 Jun 20;147(25):1933-1944. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064473. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
10
P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy versus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing coronary stenting: rationale and design of the NEOMINDSET Trial.P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与双联抗血小板治疗在接受冠状动脉支架置入术的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的比较:NEOMINDSET 试验的原理和设计。
EuroIntervention. 2023 Jul 17;19(4):e323-e329. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00125.

急性冠状动脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架置入术后的短期双联抗血小板治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析

Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stenting in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Carvalho Pedro E P, Gewehr Douglas M, Nascimento Bruno R, Melo Lara, Burkhardt Giullia, Rivera André, Braga Marcelo A P, Guimarães Patricia O, Mehran Roxana, Windecker Stephan, Valgimigli Marco, Angiolillo Dominick J, Bhatt Deepak L, Sandoval Yader, Chen Shao-Liang, Stone Gregg W, Lopes Renato D

机构信息

Center for Coronary Artery Disease, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Department of Internal Medicine, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.

出版信息

JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Dec 1;9(12):1094-1105. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3216.

DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3216
PMID:39382876
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11581547/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains under debate.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the efficacy and safety of DAPT strategies in patients with ACS using a bayesian network meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and LILACS databases were searched from inception to April 8, 2024.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing DAPT duration strategies in patients with ACS undergoing PCI were selected. Short-term strategies (1 month of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitors, 3 months of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitors, 3 months of DAPT followed by aspirin, and 6 months of DAPT followed by aspirin) were compared with conventional 12 months of DAPT.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

This systematic review and network meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The risk ratio (RR) with a 95% credible interval (CrI) was calculated within a bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis. Treatments were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary efficacy end point was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE); the primary safety end point was major bleeding.

RESULTS

A total of 15 RCTs randomizing 35 326 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.1 [11.1] years; 26 954 male [76.3%]; 11 339 STEMI [32.1%]) with ACS were included. A total of 24 797 patients (70.2%) received potent P2Y12 inhibitors (ticagrelor or prasugrel). Compared with 12 months of DAPT, 1 month of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitors reduced major bleeding (RR, 0.47; 95% CrI, 0.26-0.74) with no difference in MACCE (RR, 1.00; 95% CrI, 0.70-1.41). No significant differences were observed in MACCE incidence between strategies, although CrIs were wide. SUCRA ranked 1 month of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitors as the best for reducing major bleeding and 3 months of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitors as optimal for reducing MACCE (RR, 0.85; 95% CrI, 0.56-1.21).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Results of this systematic review and network meta-analysis reveal that, in patients with ACS undergoing PCI with DES, 1 month of DAPT followed by potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was associated with a reduction in major bleeding without increasing MACCE when compared with 12 months of DAPT. However, an increased risk of MACCE cannot be excluded, and 3 months of DAPT followed by potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was ranked as the best option to reduce MACCE. Because most patients receiving P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy were taking ticagrelor, the safety of stopping aspirin in those taking clopidogrel remains unclear.

摘要

重要性

接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的最佳持续时间仍存在争议。

目的

使用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析来分析DAPT策略在ACS患者中的疗效和安全性。

数据来源

检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane和LILACS数据库,检索时间从数据库创建至2024年4月8日。

研究选择

选择比较接受PCI的ACS患者DAPT持续时间策略的随机临床试验(RCT)。将短期策略(1个月DAPT后使用P2Y12抑制剂、3个月DAPT后使用P2Y12抑制剂、3个月DAPT后使用阿司匹林、6个月DAPT后使用阿司匹林)与传统的12个月DAPT进行比较。

数据提取与合成

本系统评价和网络荟萃分析遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南。在贝叶斯随机效应网络荟萃分析中计算风险比(RR)及95%可信区间(CrI)。使用累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)对治疗进行排序。

主要结局与测量指标

主要疗效终点为主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE);主要安全终点为大出血。

结果

共纳入15项RCT,随机分配35326例ACS患者(平均[标准差]年龄63.1[11.1]岁;男性26954例[76.3%];ST段抬高型心肌梗死11339例[32.1%])。共有24797例患者(70.2%)接受强效P2Y12抑制剂(替格瑞洛或普拉格雷)治疗。与12个月DAPT相比,1个月DAPT后使用P2Y12抑制剂可减少大出血(RR,0.47;95%CrI,0.26 - 0.74),MACCE无差异(RR,1.00;95%CrI,0.70 - 1.41)。尽管可信区间较宽,但各策略之间MACCE发生率未观察到显著差异。SUCRA将1个月DAPT后使用P2Y12抑制剂列为减少大出血的最佳方案,3个月DAPT后使用P2Y12抑制剂列为减少MACCE的最佳方案(RR,0.85;95%CrI,0.56 - 1.21)。

结论与意义

本系统评价和网络荟萃分析结果显示,在接受DES - PCI的ACS患者中,与12个月DAPT相比,1个月DAPT后使用强效P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗可减少大出血且不增加MACCE。然而,不能排除MACCE风险增加,3个月DAPT后使用强效P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗被列为减少MACCE的最佳选择。由于大多数接受P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗的患者使用的是替格瑞洛,服用氯吡格雷的患者停用阿司匹林的安全性仍不明确。