Carvalho Pedro E P, Gewehr Douglas M, Nascimento Bruno R, Melo Lara, Burkhardt Giullia, Rivera André, Braga Marcelo A P, Guimarães Patricia O, Mehran Roxana, Windecker Stephan, Valgimigli Marco, Angiolillo Dominick J, Bhatt Deepak L, Sandoval Yader, Chen Shao-Liang, Stone Gregg W, Lopes Renato D
Center for Coronary Artery Disease, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Department of Internal Medicine, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Dec 1;9(12):1094-1105. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3216.
The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains under debate.
To analyze the efficacy and safety of DAPT strategies in patients with ACS using a bayesian network meta-analysis.
MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and LILACS databases were searched from inception to April 8, 2024.
Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing DAPT duration strategies in patients with ACS undergoing PCI were selected. Short-term strategies (1 month of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitors, 3 months of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitors, 3 months of DAPT followed by aspirin, and 6 months of DAPT followed by aspirin) were compared with conventional 12 months of DAPT.
This systematic review and network meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The risk ratio (RR) with a 95% credible interval (CrI) was calculated within a bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis. Treatments were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA).
The primary efficacy end point was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE); the primary safety end point was major bleeding.
A total of 15 RCTs randomizing 35 326 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.1 [11.1] years; 26 954 male [76.3%]; 11 339 STEMI [32.1%]) with ACS were included. A total of 24 797 patients (70.2%) received potent P2Y12 inhibitors (ticagrelor or prasugrel). Compared with 12 months of DAPT, 1 month of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitors reduced major bleeding (RR, 0.47; 95% CrI, 0.26-0.74) with no difference in MACCE (RR, 1.00; 95% CrI, 0.70-1.41). No significant differences were observed in MACCE incidence between strategies, although CrIs were wide. SUCRA ranked 1 month of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitors as the best for reducing major bleeding and 3 months of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitors as optimal for reducing MACCE (RR, 0.85; 95% CrI, 0.56-1.21).
Results of this systematic review and network meta-analysis reveal that, in patients with ACS undergoing PCI with DES, 1 month of DAPT followed by potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was associated with a reduction in major bleeding without increasing MACCE when compared with 12 months of DAPT. However, an increased risk of MACCE cannot be excluded, and 3 months of DAPT followed by potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was ranked as the best option to reduce MACCE. Because most patients receiving P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy were taking ticagrelor, the safety of stopping aspirin in those taking clopidogrel remains unclear.
接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的最佳持续时间仍存在争议。
使用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析来分析DAPT策略在ACS患者中的疗效和安全性。
检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane和LILACS数据库,检索时间从数据库创建至2024年4月8日。
选择比较接受PCI的ACS患者DAPT持续时间策略的随机临床试验(RCT)。将短期策略(1个月DAPT后使用P2Y12抑制剂、3个月DAPT后使用P2Y12抑制剂、3个月DAPT后使用阿司匹林、6个月DAPT后使用阿司匹林)与传统的12个月DAPT进行比较。
本系统评价和网络荟萃分析遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南。在贝叶斯随机效应网络荟萃分析中计算风险比(RR)及95%可信区间(CrI)。使用累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)对治疗进行排序。
主要疗效终点为主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE);主要安全终点为大出血。
共纳入15项RCT,随机分配35326例ACS患者(平均[标准差]年龄63.1[11.1]岁;男性26954例[76.3%];ST段抬高型心肌梗死11339例[32.1%])。共有24797例患者(70.2%)接受强效P2Y12抑制剂(替格瑞洛或普拉格雷)治疗。与12个月DAPT相比,1个月DAPT后使用P2Y12抑制剂可减少大出血(RR,0.47;95%CrI,0.26 - 0.74),MACCE无差异(RR,1.00;95%CrI,0.70 - 1.41)。尽管可信区间较宽,但各策略之间MACCE发生率未观察到显著差异。SUCRA将1个月DAPT后使用P2Y12抑制剂列为减少大出血的最佳方案,3个月DAPT后使用P2Y12抑制剂列为减少MACCE的最佳方案(RR,0.85;95%CrI,0.56 - 1.21)。
本系统评价和网络荟萃分析结果显示,在接受DES - PCI的ACS患者中,与12个月DAPT相比,1个月DAPT后使用强效P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗可减少大出血且不增加MACCE。然而,不能排除MACCE风险增加,3个月DAPT后使用强效P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗被列为减少MACCE的最佳选择。由于大多数接受P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗的患者使用的是替格瑞洛,服用氯吡格雷的患者停用阿司匹林的安全性仍不明确。