Suppr超能文献

性欲的性别差异:对 Conley 和 Yang(2024)的回复。

Gender differences in sex drive: Reply to Conley and Yang (2024).

机构信息

Saarland University, Department of Psychology.

Leuphana University of Luneburg, Institute of Management and Organizations.

出版信息

Psychol Bull. 2024 Aug;150(8):1011-1019. doi: 10.1037/bul0000444.

Abstract

Our meta-analysis on gender differences in sex drive found a stronger sex drive in men compared to women (Frankenbach et al., 2022). Conley and Yang (2024) criticized how we interpreted the findings and provided suggestions regarding the origins of these gender differences, an undertaking that we had refrained from doing in our original work. We concur with several important points made by Conley and Yang (2024): (a) women's sexual experiences are generally more negative than men's, which could partly explain why men report more sex drive; (b) lack of statistical moderation by some sociocultural variables does not imply that the sex drives of men and women are generally unaffected by the social environment; and (c) gender differences in sexuality are likely smaller than they are often portrayed in research, and that the practical impact of this difference is largely unknown. Still, we reject other assertions made by Conley and Yang (2024): (a) we did not frame our findings in support of the view that gender differences in sex drive are determined by biology, (b) we did not conflate response bias with sociocultural biases more broadly, and (c) we did not fail to incorporate and consider gendered cultural messages about sexuality in our methods and discussion. We make several suggestions about future research on these matters. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

我们关于性别差异的性驱力的荟萃分析发现,男性的性驱力强于女性(Frankenbach 等人,2022)。Conley 和 Yang(2024)批评了我们对这些发现的解释,并就这些性别差异的起源提出了建议,而我们在最初的工作中回避了这一点。我们同意 Conley 和 Yang(2024)提出的几个重要观点:(a)女性的性经历通常比男性更消极,这可以部分解释为什么男性报告的性驱力更强;(b)一些社会文化变量缺乏统计调节并不意味着男性和女性的性驱力不受社会环境的一般影响;(c)性方面的性别差异可能比研究中通常描绘的要小,而且这种差异的实际影响在很大程度上是未知的。尽管如此,我们拒绝了 Conley 和 Yang(2024)提出的其他说法:(a)我们没有将我们的发现表述为支持性驱力的性别差异是由生物学决定的观点;(b)我们没有将反应偏差与更广泛的社会文化偏见混为一谈;(c)我们没有在方法和讨论中纳入和考虑关于性的性别化文化信息。我们就这些问题提出了一些关于未来研究的建议。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验