Suppr超能文献

性欲:性别差异的理论概念化与元分析综述

Sex drive: Theoretical conceptualization and meta-analytic review of gender differences.

作者信息

Frankenbach Julius, Weber Marcel, Loschelder David D, Kilger Helena, Friese Malte

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Saarland University.

Institute of Management and Organizations, Leuphana University of Luneburg.

出版信息

Psychol Bull. 2022 Sep-Oct;148(9-10):621-661. doi: 10.1037/bul0000366. Epub 2022 Oct 13.

Abstract

Few spheres in life are as universally relevant for (almost) all individuals past puberty as sexuality. One important aspect of sexuality concerns individuals' sex drive-their dispositional sexual motivation. A vigorous scientific (and popular) debate revolves around the question of whether or not there is a gender difference in sex drive. Several theories predict a higher sex drive in men compared to women, with some theories attributing this difference to biased responding rather than true differences. Currently, there is little consensus on how to conceptualize sex drive, nor does a quantitative summary of the literature exist. In this article, we present a theory-driven conceptualization of sex drive as the density distribution of state sex drive, where state sex drive is defined as momentary sexual motivation that manifests in sexual cognition, affect, and behavior. We conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis of gender differences in sex drive based on 211 studies, 856 effect sizes, and 621,463 persons. The meta-analysis revealed a stronger sex drive in men compared to women, with a medium-to-large effect size, = 0.69, 95% CI [0.58, 0.81]. Men more often think and fantasize about sex, more often experience sexual affect like desire, and more often engage in masturbation than women. Adjustment for biased responding reduced the gender difference ( = 0.54). Moderation analyses suggest that the effect is robust and largely invariant to contextual factors. There was no evidence of publication bias. The discussion focuses on validity considerations, limitations, and implications for psychological theory and people's everyday lives. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

在生活中,几乎没有哪个领域能像性取向一样,对青春期后的所有人都具有普遍相关性。性取向的一个重要方面涉及个体的性欲——他们的性倾向动机。一场激烈的科学(以及大众)辩论围绕着性欲是否存在性别差异这一问题展开。一些理论预测男性的性欲高于女性,有些理论将这种差异归因于有偏差的反应而非真正的差异。目前,对于如何概念化性欲尚未达成共识,也不存在对相关文献的定量总结。在本文中,我们提出一种基于理论的性欲概念化,将其视为状态性驱力的密度分布,其中状态性驱力被定义为在性认知、情感和行为中表现出来的瞬间性动机。我们基于211项研究、856个效应量和621463人,对性欲的性别差异进行了全面的元分析。元分析显示,男性的性欲比女性更强,效应量为中到大,Cohen's d = 0.69,95%置信区间[0.58, 0.81]。男性比女性更频繁地思考和幻想性,更频繁地体验到如欲望等性情感,也更频繁地进行自慰。对有偏差反应进行调整后,性别差异减小(Cohen's d = 0.54)。调节分析表明,该效应是稳健的,并且在很大程度上不受情境因素的影响。没有证据表明存在发表偏倚。讨论集中在有效性考量、局限性以及对心理学理论和人们日常生活的影响。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验