Di Gennaro Stella, Fila Julia, Veloso Verónica, Lasmarías Cristina, Tripodoro Vilma A
RED-In-Pal - Instituto Pallium Latinoamérica, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Clínica Universitaria Reina Fabiola, Universidad Católica de Córdoba, Argentina. E-mail:
Medicina (B Aires). 2024;84(4):619-628.
Shared care planning (ACP) is a reflective, deliberative and structured process involving the sick person and his or her caring environment. Health professionals recognize barriers to initiating ACP.Perceived self-efficacy is one of the main predictors of success in learning processes.
Exploratory instrumental study carried out on health professionals who assist patients with advanced chronic diseases, interdisciplinary through a comprehension test of the ACP-SEs instrument and psychometric validation in a purposive sample of professionals. Sociodemographic variables and previous experience were analyzed.
After the comprehension test and linguistic adaptation of the scale through cognitive testing with eight professionals with experience with advanced chronic patients, the ACP-SEs Ar version of the scale was achieved. 236 professionals participated in the exploration, 83% attended patients with advanced chronic disease, 52.9 % were physicians, 52% received informal training in ACP, and 11% had a personal advance directive document. The scale's internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89). Questions about prognosis, treatment options, goals, treatment preferences, and reassessment of goals of care showed significant differences between physicians and nonphysicians.
We explored PCA self-efficacy in health professionals with the ACP-SEs Ar scale validated for the first time in Argentina.
共享照护计划(ACP)是一个涉及患者及其照护环境的反思性、审议性和结构化过程。卫生专业人员认识到启动 ACP 存在障碍。自我效能感是学习过程中成功的主要预测因素之一。
1)对适用于阿根廷的西班牙语 ACP 自我效能量表(ACP-SEs)进行跨文化改编;2)探索该量表的信度和效度;3)探索阿根廷专业人员在 ACP 中的自我效能感。
对协助晚期慢性病患者的卫生专业人员进行探索性工具性研究,通过对 ACP-SEs 工具的理解测试和对专业人员的目的性样本进行心理测量验证,进行跨学科研究。分析社会人口统计学变量和既往经验。
在通过对八名有晚期慢性病患者护理经验的专业人员进行认知测试对量表进行理解测试和语言改编后,获得了 ACP-SEs 量表的阿根廷版本。236 名专业人员参与了探索,83%的人照料晚期慢性病患者,52.9%是医生,52%接受过 ACP 的非正式培训,11%有个人预先医疗指示文件。该量表的内部一致性较高(Cronbach's alpha = 0.89)。关于预后、治疗选择、目标、治疗偏好以及护理目标重新评估的问题在医生和非医生之间存在显著差异。
我们使用首次在阿根廷验证的 ACP-SEs 量表探索了卫生专业人员在 ACP 中的自我效能感。