• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床护士中文版预先医疗照护计划自我效能感量表的心理测量学评估。

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of advance care planning self-efficacy scale among clinical nurses.

机构信息

The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, No.155, Nanjing North Street, Heping District, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Oct 7;21(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01064-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12904-022-01064-6
PMID:36207699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9541061/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nurses are one of the most critical members of advance care planning (ACP) discussion. The evaluation of ACP self-efficacy is of great significance for developing targeted ACP interventions among clinical nurses and update their professional roles. However, there are few instruments to evaluate their ACP self-efficacy in mainland China. The purpose of this study was to translate the ACP self-efficacy scale into Chinese and evaluate its psychometric properties among clinical nurses.

METHODS

A methodological study of the translation and validation of the ACP self-efficacy scale was conducted from January to March 2022. It involved three phases: (1) the translation and revision of the scale; (2) the exploration and evaluation of the item (n = 436); (3) the psychometric evaluation of the scale (n = 674).

RESULTS

After a rigorous translation and revision, the ACP self-efficacy scale with three dimensions and 16 items was finally formed. In this study, the critical ratios of the item ranged from 8.226 to 17.499, and the item-total correlation coefficients ranged from 0.437 to 0.732, and the factor loadings of the item ranged from 0.638 to 0.882. The content validity index of the scale was 0.946. Supported by the eigenvalues, the three-factor structure explained the cumulative 61.131% of the overall variance. As the results of confirmatory factor analysis, all the recommended fitting indexes were appropriate. The average variance extracted values ranged from 0.570 to 0.756, and the composite reliability values ranged from 0.858 to 0.925. The total Cronbach's α coefficient, split-half reliability coefficient and test-retest reliability coefficient of the scale were 0.896, 0.767 and 0.939, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The Chinese version of ACP self-efficacy scale was successfully introduced into China, showing good psychometric properties among clinical nurses, and can effectively assess the ACP self-efficacy. Also, the scale can provide nursing educators with a significant strategy to develop ACP educational procedure and post-intervention measures for clinical nurses to improve nurse-led ACP practice.

摘要

背景

护士是预先医疗照护计划(ACP)讨论中最重要的成员之一。评估 ACP 自我效能对制定针对临床护士的 ACP 干预措施并更新他们的专业角色具有重要意义。然而,在中国,很少有工具可以评估他们的 ACP 自我效能。本研究旨在将 ACP 自我效能量表翻译成中文,并评估其在临床护士中的心理测量特性。

方法

2022 年 1 月至 3 月,进行了 ACP 自我效能量表的翻译和验证的方法学研究。它涉及三个阶段:(1)量表的翻译和修订;(2)项目探索和评估(n=436);(3)量表的心理测量评估(n=674)。

结果

经过严格的翻译和修订,最终形成了具有三个维度和 16 个项目的 ACP 自我效能量表。在本研究中,项目的临界比范围为 8.226 至 17.499,项目总分相关系数范围为 0.437 至 0.732,项目的因子负荷范围为 0.638 至 0.882。量表的内容效度指数为 0.946。支持特征值,三因素结构解释了总体方差的 61.131%的累积方差。验证性因素分析的结果表明,所有推荐的拟合指标都合适。平均方差提取值范围为 0.570 至 0.756,组合可靠性值范围为 0.858 至 0.925。量表的总 Cronbach's α 系数、半分信度系数和重测信度系数分别为 0.896、0.767 和 0.939。

结论

ACP 自我效能量表的中文版成功引入中国,在临床护士中表现出良好的心理测量特性,能有效评估 ACP 自我效能。此外,该量表可以为护理教育者提供一种重要的策略,为临床护士制定 ACP 教育程序和干预后措施,以提高护士主导的 ACP 实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d7b/9541061/651986b253c1/12904_2022_1064_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d7b/9541061/af3ad7e20b75/12904_2022_1064_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d7b/9541061/651986b253c1/12904_2022_1064_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d7b/9541061/af3ad7e20b75/12904_2022_1064_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d7b/9541061/651986b253c1/12904_2022_1064_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of advance care planning self-efficacy scale among clinical nurses.临床护士中文版预先医疗照护计划自我效能感量表的心理测量学评估。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Oct 7;21(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01064-6.
2
Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Advance Care Planning Self-efficacy Scale for Physicians.中文版医师预先医疗照护计划自我效能感量表的信度和效度。
J Palliat Care. 2024 Jan;39(1):36-46. doi: 10.1177/08258597231185679. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
3
Development and validation of the advance care planning practice preference scale for clinical nurses.临床护士预先医疗照护计划实践偏好量表的编制与验证。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Jul;79(7):2695-2708. doi: 10.1111/jan.15641. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
4
Evaluation of reliability and validity regarding the Chinese version of Critical Cultural Competence Scale for clinical nurses.临床护士关键文化能力量表中文版的信度和效度评价。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Oct 28;47(10):1425-1434. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210695.
5
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Chinese version of self-efficacy and attitudes for providing Mouth Care scale.自我效能感和提供口腔护理态度量表中文版的翻译、跨文化调适和验证。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 22;17(7):e0271800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271800. eCollection 2022.
6
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief-Mindful Self-Care Scale: A Translation and Validation Study.中文版简易正念自我关怀量表的心理测量学特性:一项翻译与验证研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 13;12:715507. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715507. eCollection 2021.
7
Chinese version of the clinical supervision self-assessment tool: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床督导自我评估工具中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104734. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104734. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
8
A Chinese version of the Participation Strategies Self Efficacy Scale (PS-SES): psychometric evaluation in stroke survivors.参与策略自我效能感量表(PS-SES)的中文版本:中风幸存者的心理计量评估。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Aug;44(16):4500-4508. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1907796. Epub 2021 Apr 4.
9
Spanish Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Advance Care Planning Self-Efficacy: A Cross-Sectional Study.西班牙语跨文化适应性及预先医疗照护计划自我效能感的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
J Palliat Med. 2021 Dec;24(12):1807-1815. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0653. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
10
Psychometric properties of the Chinese mainland version of the Palliative Care Spiritual Care Competency Scale (PCSCCS-M) in nursing: a cross-sectional study.简体中文版《安宁疗护灵性照护能力量表》在护理中的心理测量学特性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Mar 8;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0409-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and psychometric test of self-advocacy scale for patients with stroke.中风患者自我维权量表的编制与心理测量学测试
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 26;15(1):27247. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08109-9.
2
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the M.D. Anderson symptom Inventory-Multiple Myeloma Module: a translation and validation study.中文版安德森癌症中心症状量表-多发性骨髓瘤模块的心理测量学特性:一项翻译与验证研究
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 8;25(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14054-7.
3
Development and validation of the renal dosing questionnaire (RDQ-13) for pharmacists.

本文引用的文献

1
Advance Care Planning Among Elderly Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Patients: A Qualitative Preference Study.老年获得性免疫缺陷综合征患者的预先护理计划:一项定性偏好研究。
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2022 Apr 1;24(2):E10-E17. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000824.
2
Psychometric evaluation of medication safety competence scale for clinical nurses.临床护士用药安全能力量表的心理测量学评估
BMC Nurs. 2021 Sep 9;20(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00679-z.
3
Nurse-led normalised advance care planning service in hospital and community health settings: a qualitative study.
药剂师用肾脏给药问卷(RDQ - 13)的开发与验证
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 20;103(51):e41004. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041004.
4
Patients' sense of medical gain on family doctor contracting services in China: scale development and preliminary validation.中国患者对家庭医生签约服务的医疗获益感:量表编制与初步验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1602. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12070-0.
5
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the nurse turnover intention scale: a translation and validation study.中文版护士离职意愿量表的心理测量学评价:一项翻译与验证研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Oct 29;23(1):792. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02459-x.
6
Validation of the Chinese version of the 'caring ability of family caregivers of patients with cancer scale (CAFCPCS)' in family caregivers of elderly patients with cancer: A study protocol.验证中文版“癌症患者家属照顾能力量表(CAFCPCS)”在老年癌症患者家属中的适用性:研究方案。
Nurs Open. 2024 Jul;11(7):e2227. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2227.
7
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the health behavior motivation scale: a translation and validation study.健康行为动机量表中文版的心理测量学特性:一项翻译与验证研究
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 17;15:1279816. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1279816. eCollection 2024.
8
A scale for measuring home-based cardiac rehabilitation exercise adherence: a development and validation study.一种用于测量家庭心脏康复运动依从性的量表:一项开发与验证研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Aug 7;22(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01426-2.
9
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Chinese version of career success in nursing scale (CSNS).中文版护理职业成功量表(CSNS)的跨文化调适与心理测量学验证
BMC Nurs. 2023 Jul 28;22(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01415-5.
10
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Elderly-Constipation Impact Scale: a translation and validation study.《中文版老年人便秘影响量表的心理测量学评估:翻译与验证研究》
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 13;23(1):1345. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16231-4.
护士主导的规范化预立医疗照护计划服务在医院和社区卫生环境中的应用:一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Sep 9;20(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00835-x.
4
Spanish Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Advance Care Planning Self-Efficacy: A Cross-Sectional Study.西班牙语跨文化适应性及预先医疗照护计划自我效能感的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
J Palliat Med. 2021 Dec;24(12):1807-1815. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0653. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
5
Evaluating SEM Model Fit with Small Degrees of Freedom.用小自由度评估 SEM 模型拟合度。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2022 Mar-May;57(2-3):179-207. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2020.1868965. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
6
Effectiveness of a Nurse-Led Multidisciplinary Intervention vs Usual Care on Advance Care Planning for Vulnerable Older Adults in an Accountable Care Organization: A Randomized Clinical Trial.护士主导的多学科干预与常规护理对问责制医疗组织中脆弱老年人的预先护理计划的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Mar 1;181(3):361-369. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5950.
7
Roles and Responsibilities of Nurses in Advance Care Planning in Palliative Care in the Acute Care Setting: A Scoping Review.在急性照护环境下,姑息治疗中护士在预先医疗照护计划中的角色和责任:范围综述。
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2021 Feb 1;23(1):59-68. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000715.
8
Healthcare professionals' perceptions of advance care planning in palliative care unit: a qualitative descriptive study.医护人员对姑息治疗病房中预先医疗指示的看法:一项定性描述性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Mar;30(5-6):633-644. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15578. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
9
Issues and recommendations for exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis.探索性因子分析和主成分分析的问题与建议。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 May;17(5):1004-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.07.027. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
10
Advance care planning in Asian culture.亚洲文化中的预先医疗护理计划。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 5;50(9):976-989. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa131.