From the Department of Child Neurology (D.H.S., M.S.v.d.K., N.I.W.), Emma's Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit; Amsterdam Leukodystrophy Center (D.H.S., M.S.v.d.K., N.I.W.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Cellular & Molecular Mechanisms; Medicine for Society (D.H.S., S.v.d.B., N.R., C.E.M.H.), Platform at Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism (S.v.d.B., A.B., M.R.D., N.R., C.E.M.H.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; National Health Care Institute (Zorginstituut Nederland) (L.T.), Diemen, the Netherlands; Division of Child Neurology (L.A.A.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Institute of Systems Motor Science (T.B.), CBBM, Universität of Lübeck; Centre of Rare Diseases (T.B.), University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Lübeck, Germany; Division of Metabolic Diseases (A.B.), Department of Pediatrics, Emma Childrens' Hospital, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; National Health Care Institute RIZIV-INAMI (M.v.d.C.), Brussels, Belgium; VKS (H.D.), Dutch Patient Organization for Metabolic Diseases, Zwolle; United for Metabolic Diseases (UMD) (H.D.), Amsterdam, the Netherlands; International Niemann-Pick Disease Registry (C.D.), Washington, Tyne & Wear, United Kingdom; VSOP-Patient Alliance for Rare and Genetic Diseases (M.H.E.D.), Soest, the Netherlands; Institute for Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics (H.G.), University of Tübingen; Centre for Rare Disease (H.G.), University Hospital Tübingen, Germany; Yaya foundation for 4H Leukodystrophy (V.G.), Minneapolis, MN; Orphanet (T.H.), INSERM US14 Rare Disease Platform, Paris, France; Department of Neurology (G.U.H.), LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), Munich; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases e.V. (DZNE) (G.U.H., T.K.), Munich; Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) (G.U.H.), Germany; Department of Pediatrics (H.v.d.H.), Center for Lysosomal and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam; European Medicines Agency (C.J., K.P.), Amsterdam; Medicines Evaluation Board (C.J.), Utrecht; Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism (M.L.), Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Canadian Agency for Drugs and Health Technology Technologies Agendcy in Health (CADTH) (L.J.L.), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; CHDI Management, Inc. (E.N.), the company that manages the scientific activities of CHDI Foundation, Inc., New York, NY; National Health Care Institute (M.N., W.G.G.), Diemen, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (T.K.), University of Bonn, Germany; Department of Integrative Neurophysiology (M.S.v.d.K.), Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; European Commission (A.P.), Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy; Patient Advocate Organization 'Vereniging HCHWA-d' (HCHWA-D Association) (S.v.R.), the Netherlands; European Leukodystrophies Association (E.F.S.-V.), Paris, France; Medical BioSciences Department (B.d.S.V.), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen; and WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Policy and Regulation (W.G.G.), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
Neurology. 2024 Sep 24;103(6):e209743. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209743. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
Progress in genetic diagnosis and orphan drug legislation has opened doors to new therapies in rare neurogenetic diseases (RNDs). Innovative therapies such as gene therapy can improve patients' quality of life but come with academic, regulatory, and financial challenges. Registries can play a pivotal role in generating evidence to tackle these, but their development requires multidisciplinary knowledge and expertise. This study aims to develop a practical framework for creating and implementing patient registries addressing common challenges and maximizing their impact on care, research, drug development, and regulatory decision making with a focus on RNDs. A comprehensive 3-step literature and qualitative research approach was used to develop the framework. A qualitative systematic literature review was conducted, extracting guidance and practices leading to the draft framework. Subsequently, we interviewed representatives of 5 established international RND registries to add learnings from hands-on experiences to the framework. Expert input on the draft framework was sought in digital multistakeholder focus groups to refine the framework. The literature search; interviews with 5 registries; and focus groups with patient representatives (n = 4), clinicians (n = 6), regulators, health technology assessment (HTA) bodies and payers (n = 7), industry representatives (n = 7), and data/information technology (IT) specialists (n = 5) informed development of the framework. It covers the interests of different stakeholders, purposes for data utilization, data aspects, IT infrastructure, governance, and financing of rare disease registries. Key principles include that data should be rapidly accessible, independent, and trustworthy. Governance should involve multiple stakeholders. In addition, data should be highly descriptive, machine-readable, and accessible through a shared infrastructure and not spread over multiple isolated repositories. Sustainable and independent financing of registries is deemed important but remains challenging because of a lack of widely supported funding models. The proposed framework will guide stakeholders in establishing or improving rare disease registries that fulfill requirements of academics and patients as well as regulators, HTA bodies, and commercial parties. There is a need for more clarity regarding quality requirements for registries in regulatory and HTA context. In addition, independent financing models for registries should be developed, as well as well-defined policies on technical uniformity in health data.
遗传诊断和孤儿药立法的进展为罕见神经遗传疾病 (RND) 的新疗法开辟了道路。基因治疗等创新疗法可以提高患者的生活质量,但也带来了学术、监管和财务方面的挑战。登记处可以在产生解决这些问题的证据方面发挥关键作用,但它们的发展需要多学科的知识和专业知识。本研究旨在制定一个实用的框架,用于创建和实施患者登记处,以解决常见挑战,并最大限度地提高其对护理、研究、药物开发和监管决策的影响,重点关注 RND。使用全面的三步文献和定性研究方法来制定框架。进行了定性系统文献综述,提取了指导和实践,为框架草案提供了依据。随后,我们采访了 5 个已建立的国际 RND 登记处的代表,将实际经验中的经验教训纳入框架。在数字多方利益相关者焦点小组中征求了对框架草案的专家意见,以完善框架。文献检索;对 5 个登记处的访谈;以及患者代表(n=4)、临床医生(n=6)、监管机构、健康技术评估(HTA)机构和支付方(n=7)、行业代表(n=7)和数据/信息技术(IT)专家(n=5)的焦点小组参与为框架的制定提供了信息。它涵盖了不同利益相关者的利益、数据利用目的、数据方面、IT 基础设施、治理和罕见病登记处的融资。主要原则包括数据应快速可访问、独立且值得信赖。治理应涉及多个利益相关者。此外,数据应具有高度描述性、机器可读,并且可通过共享基础设施访问,而不是分散在多个孤立的存储库中。人们认为,登记处的可持续和独立融资很重要,但由于缺乏广泛支持的融资模式,这仍然具有挑战性。拟议的框架将指导利益相关者建立或改进满足学术界和患者以及监管机构、HTA 机构和商业方要求的罕见病登记处。在监管和 HTA 背景下,需要更加明确登记处的质量要求。此外,应制定登记处的独立融资模式,并制定卫生数据技术统一的明确政策。