WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Psychiatry Res. 2024 Oct;340:116124. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116124. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
To assess the effect of Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics in acutely ill patients, we systematically searched major databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LAIs with other LAIs, oral antipsychotics, or placebo in acutely symptomatic adults with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Data were analyzed with a random-effects network meta-analysis. Co-primary outcomes were efficacy (mean change in psychopathology rating scales) and acceptability (all-cause discontinuations) at study endpoint. Of 25 RCTs, 19 studies tested second-generation LAIs (SGA-LAIs) and six first-generation LAIs (FGA-LAIs). Due to a disconnected network, FGA-LAIs were analyzed separately, with poor data quality. The SGA-LAIs network included 8,418 individuals (males=63%, mean age=39.3 years). All SGA-LAIs outperformed placebo in reducing acute symptoms at study endpoint (median follow-up=13 weeks). They were more acceptable than placebo with the only exception of olanzapine, for which no differences with placebo emerged. Additionally, we distinguished between different LAI formulations of the same antipsychotic to explore potential pharmacokinetic differences. Most formulations outperformed placebo in the very short-term (2 weeks or less), regardless of the need for initial oral supplementation. SGA-LAIs are evidence-based treatments in acutely ill individuals with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Findings support the use of SGA-LAIs to manage psychopathology and improve adherence right from the acute phases of illness.
为了评估长效注射抗精神病药(LAI)在急性发病患者中的效果,我们系统性地检索了主要数据库,以寻找比较 LAI 与其他 LAI、口服抗精神病药或安慰剂在伴有精神分裂症谱系障碍的急性症状成人中的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用随机效应网络荟萃分析对数据进行分析。主要结局指标为研究终点时的疗效(精神病理学评定量表的平均变化)和可接受性(全因停药)。在 25 项 RCT 中,有 19 项研究测试了第二代 LAI(SGA-LAI),6 项研究测试了第一代 LAI(FGA-LAI)。由于网络不连贯,FGA-LAI 被单独分析,数据质量较差。SGA-LAI 网络包含 8418 人(男性占 63%,平均年龄 39.3 岁)。所有 SGA-LAI 在研究终点时都比安慰剂更能减轻急性症状(中位数随访时间=13 周)。除奥氮平外,它们比安慰剂更具可接受性,而奥氮平与安慰剂无差异。此外,我们还区分了同一抗精神病药的不同 LAI 制剂,以探索潜在的药代动力学差异。大多数制剂在非常短期(2 周或更短)内优于安慰剂,无论是否需要初始口服补充。SGA-LAI 是精神分裂症谱系障碍急性患者的循证治疗方法。研究结果支持使用 SGA-LAI 来管理精神病理学并改善疾病急性期的依从性。