Northfield Mount Hermon School, Gill, MA, United States of America.
Center of Engineering, Modeling and Applied Social Science, Federal University of ABC (UFABC), Santo André, Brazil.
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2024 Sep 5;10(6). doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad7267.
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading causes of vision loss in adults and is one of the detrimental side effects of the mass prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus (DM). It is crucial to have an efficient screening method for early diagnosis of DR to prevent vision loss. This paper compares and analyzes the various Machine Learning (ML) techniques, from traditional ML to advanced Deep Learning models. We compared and analyzed the efficacy of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Capsule Networks (CapsNet), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), decision trees, and Random Forests. This paper also considers determining factors in the evaluation, including contrast enhancements, noise reduction, grayscaling, etc We analyze recent research studies and compare methodologies and metrics, including accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and specificity. The findings highlight the advanced performance of Deep Learning (DL) models, with CapsNet achieving a remarkable accuracy of up to 97.98% and a high precision rate, outperforming other traditional ML methods. The Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) preprocessing technique substantially enhanced the model's efficiency. Each ML method's computational requirements are also considered. While most advanced deep learning methods performed better according to the metrics, they are more computationally complex, requiring more resources and data input. We also discussed how datasets like MESSIDOR could be more straightforward and contribute to highly evaluated performance and that there is a lack of consistency regarding benchmark datasets across papers in the field. Using the DL models facilitates accurate early detection for DR screening, can potentially reduce vision loss risks, and improves accessibility and cost-efficiency of eye screening. Further research is recommended to extend our findings by building models with public datasets, experimenting with ensembles of DL and traditional ML models, and considering testing high-performing models like CapsNet.
糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)是成年人视力丧失的主要原因之一,也是糖尿病(DM)大规模流行的有害副作用之一。拥有一种有效的筛查方法来早期诊断 DR 以防止视力丧失至关重要。本文比较和分析了各种机器学习(ML)技术,从传统的 ML 到先进的深度学习模型。我们比较和分析了卷积神经网络(CNNs)、胶囊网络(CapsNet)、K-最近邻(KNN)、支持向量机(SVM)、决策树和随机森林的功效。本文还考虑了评估中的确定因素,包括对比度增强、降噪、灰度化等。我们分析了最近的研究,并比较了方法和指标,包括准确性、精度、敏感性和特异性。研究结果突出了深度学习(DL)模型的先进性能,CapsNet 的准确率高达 97.98%,精度较高,优于其他传统 ML 方法。对比度受限自适应直方图均衡化(CLAHE)预处理技术大大提高了模型的效率。还考虑了每种 ML 方法的计算要求。虽然根据指标,大多数先进的深度学习方法表现更好,但它们的计算复杂度更高,需要更多的资源和数据输入。我们还讨论了像 MESSIDOR 这样的数据集如何可以更简单,并有助于实现高度评估的性能,并且该领域的论文之间缺乏基准数据集的一致性。使用 DL 模型有助于进行 DR 筛查的早期准确检测,可以潜在地降低视力丧失的风险,并提高眼部筛查的可及性和成本效益。建议进一步研究,通过使用公共数据集构建模型、实验性地将 DL 和传统 ML 模型集成以及考虑测试 CapsNet 等高性能模型来扩展我们的研究结果。